BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jay Bartroff

Jay Bartroff contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodologymath.PR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Optimal and fast confidence intervals for hypergeometric successes

We present an efficient method of calculating exact confidence intervals for the hypergeometric parameter representing the number of "successes," or "special items," in the population. The method inverts minimum-width acceptance intervals after shifting them to make their endpoints nondecreasing while preserving their level. The resulting set of confidence intervals achieves minimum possible average size, and even in comparison with confidence sets not required to be intervals it attains the minimum possible cardinality most of the time, and always within $1$. The method compares favorably with existing methods not only in the size of the intervals but also in the time required to compute them. The available \textsf{R} package \texttt{hyperMCI} implements the proposed method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Asymptotically optimal sequential FDR and pFDR control with (or without) prior information on the number of signals

We investigate asymptotically optimal multiple testing procedures for streams of sequential data in the context of prior information on the number of false null hypotheses ("signals"). We show that the "gap" and "gap-intersection" procedures, recently proposed and shown by Song and Fellouris (2017, Electron. J. Statist.) to be asymptotically optimal for controlling type 1 and 2 familywise error rates (FWEs), are also asymptotically optimal for controlling FDR/FNR when their critical values are appropriately adjusted. Generalizing this result, we show that these procedures, again with appropriately adjusted critical values, are asymptotically optimal for controlling any multiple testing error metric that is bounded between multiples of FWE in a certain sense. This class of metrics includes FDR/FNR but also pFDR/pFNR, the per-comparison and per-family error rates, and the false positive rate. Our analysis includes asymptotic regimes in which the number of null hypotheses approaches $\infty$ as the type 1 and 2 error metrics approach $0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The Spend-It-All Region and Small Time Results for the Continuous Bomber Problem

A problem of optimally allocating partially effective ammunition $x$ to be used on randomly arriving enemies in order to maximize an aircraft's probability of surviving for time~$t$, known as the Bomber Problem, was first posed by \citet{Klinger68}. They conjectured a set of apparently obvious monotonicity properties of the optimal allocation function $K(x,t)$. Although some of these conjectures, and versions thereof, have been proved or disproved by other authors since then, the remaining central question, that $K(x,t)$ is nondecreasing in~$x$, remains unsettled. After reviewing the problem and summarizing the state of these conjectures, in the setting where $x$ is continuous we prove the existence of a ``spend-it-all'' region in which $K(x,t)=x$ and find its boundary, inside of which the long-standing, unproven conjecture of monotonicity of~$K(\cdot,t)$ holds. A new approach is then taken of directly estimating~$K(x,t)$ for small~$t$, providing a complete small-$t$ asymptotic description of~$K(x,t)$ and the optimal probability of survival.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access