BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Javier Esparza

Javier Esparza contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingLogic in Computer ScienceFormal Languages and Automata TheoryComputational ComplexityMultiagent Systems

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Lower Bounds on the State Complexity of Population Protocols

Population protocols are a model of computation in which an arbitrary number of indistinguishable finite-state agents interact in pairs. The goal of the agents is to decide by stable consensus whether their initial global configuration satisfies a given property, specified as a predicate on the set of configurations. The state complexity of a predicate is the number of states of a smallest protocol that computes it. Previous work by Blondin \textit{et al.} has shown that the counting predicates $x \geq η$ have state complexity $\mathcal{O}(\log η)$ for leaderless protocols and $\mathcal{O}(\log \log η)$ for protocols with leaders. We obtain the first non-trivial lower bounds: the state complexity of $x \geq η$ is $Ω(\log\log η)$ for leaderless protocols, and the inverse of a non-elementary function for protocols with leaders.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Complexity of Verifying Population Protocols

Population protocols [Angluin et al., PODC, 2004] are a model of distributed computation in which indistinguishable, finite-state agents interact in pairs to decide if their initial configuration, i.e., the initial number of agents in each state, satisfies a given property. In a seminal paper Angluin et al. classified population protocols according to their communication mechanism, and conducted an exhaustive study of the expressive power of each class, that is, of the properties they can decide [Angluin et al., Distributed Computing, 2007]. In this paper we study the correctness problem for population protocols, i.e., whether a given protocol decides a given property. A previous paper [Esparza et al., Acta Informatica, 2017] has shown that the problem is decidable for the main population protocol model, but at least as hard as the reachability problem for Petri nets, which has recently been proved to have non-elementary complexity. Motivated by this result, we study the computational complexity of the correctness problem for all other classes introduced by Angluin et al., some of which are less powerful than the main model. Our main results show that for the class of observation models the complexity of the problem is much lower, ranging from $Π_2^p$ to PSPACE.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Classification of Weak Asynchronous Models of Distributed Computing

We conduct a systematic study of asynchronous models of distributed computing consisting of identical finite-state devices that cooperate in a network to decide if the network satisfies a given graph-theoretical property. Models discussed in the literature differ in the detection capabilities of the agents residing at the nodes of the network (detecting the set of states of their neighbors, or counting the number of neighbors in each state), the notion of acceptance (acceptance by halting in a particular configuration, or by stable consensus), the notion of step (synchronous move, interleaving, or arbitrary timing), and the fairness assumptions (non-starving, or stochastic-like). We study the expressive power of the combinations of these features, and show that the initially twenty possible combinations fit into seven equivalence classes. The classification is the consequence of several equi-expressivity results with a clear interpretation. In particular, we show that acceptance by halting configuration only has non-trivial expressive power if it is combined with counting, and that synchronous and interleaving models have the same power as those in which an arbitrary set of nodes can move at the same time. We also identify simple graph properties that distinguish the expressive power of the seven classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An Efficient Normalisation Procedure for Linear Temporal Logic and Very Weak Alternating Automata

In the mid 80s, Lichtenstein, Pnueli, and Zuck proved a classical theorem stating that every formula of Past LTL (the extension of LTL with past operators) is equivalent to a formula of the form $\bigwedge_{i=1}^n \mathbf{G}\mathbf{F} φ_i \vee \mathbf{F}\mathbf{G} ψ_i$, where $φ_i$ and $ψ_i$ contain only past operators. Some years later, Chang, Manna, and Pnueli built on this result to derive a similar normal form for LTL. Both normalisation procedures have a non-elementary worst-case blow-up, and follow an involved path from formulas to counter-free automata to star-free regular expressions and back to formulas. We improve on both points. We present a direct and purely syntactic normalisation procedure for LTL yielding a normal form, comparable to the one by Chang, Manna, and Pnueli, that has only a single exponential blow-up. As an application, we derive a simple algorithm to translate LTL into deterministic Rabin automata. The algorithm normalises the formula, translates it into a special very weak alternating automaton, and applies a simple determinisation procedure, valid only for these special automata.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Checking Qualitative Liveness Properties of Replicated Systems with Stochastic Scheduling

We present a sound and complete method for the verification of qualitative liveness properties of replicated systems under stochastic scheduling. These are systems consisting of a finite-state program, executed by an unknown number of indistinguishable agents, where the next agent to make a move is determined by the result of a random experiment. We show that if a property of such a system holds, then there is always a witness in the shape of a Presburger stage graph: a finite graph whose nodes are Presburger-definable sets of configurations. Due to the high complexity of the verification problem (non-elementary), we introduce an incomplete procedure for the construction of Presburger stage graphs, and implement it on top of an SMT solver. The procedure makes extensive use of the theory of well-quasi-orders, and of the structural theory of Petri nets and vector addition systems. We apply our results to a set of benchmarks, in particular to a large collection of population protocols, a model of distributed computation extensively studied by the distributed computing community.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Flatness and Complexity of Immediate Observation Petri Nets

In a previous paper we introduced immediate observation (IO) Petri nets, a class of interest in the study of population protocols and enzymatic chemical networks. In the first part of this paper we show that IO nets are globally flat, and so their safety properties can be checked by efficient symbolic model checking tools using acceleration techniques, like FAST. In the second part we study Branching IO nets (BIO nets), whose transitions can create tokens. BIO nets extend both IO nets and communication-free nets, also called BPP nets, a widely studied class. We show that, while BIO nets are no longer globally flat, and their sets of reachable markings may be non-semilinear, they are still locally flat. As a consequence, the coverability and reachability problem for BIO nets, and even a certain set-parameterized version of them, are in PSPACE. This makes BIO nets the first natural net class with non-semilinear reachability relation for which the reachability problem is provably simpler than for general Petri nets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Online Monitoring $ω$-Regular Properties in Unknown Markov Chains

We study runtime monitoring of $ω$-regular properties. We consider a simple setting in which a run of an unknown finite-state Markov chain $\mathcal M$ is monitored against a fixed but arbitrary $ω$-regular specification $φ$. The purpose of monitoring is to keep aborting runs that are "unlikely" to satisfy the specification until $\mathcal M$ executes a correct run. We design controllers for the reset action that (assuming that $φ$ has positive probability) satisfy the following property w.p.1: the number of resets is finite, and the run executed by $\mathcal M$ after the last reset satisfies $φ$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Peregrine 2.0: Explaining Correctness of Population Protocols through Stage Graphs

We present a new version of Peregrine, the tool for the analysis and parameterized verification of population protocols introduced in [Blondin et al., CAV'2018]. Population protocols are a model of computation, intensely studied by the distributed computing community, in which mobile anonymous agents interact stochastically to perform a task. Peregrine 2.0 features a novel verification engine based on the construction of stage graphs. Stage graphs are proof certificates, introduced in [Blondin et al., CAV'2020], that are typically succinct and can be independently checked. Moreover, unlike the techniques of Peregrine 1.0, the stage graph methodology can verify protocols whose executions never terminate, a class including recent fast majority protocols. Peregrine 2.0 also features a novel proof visualization component that allows the user to interactively explore the stage graph generated for a given protocol.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Succinct Population Protocols for Presburger Arithmetic

Angluin et al. proved that population protocols compute exactly the predicates definable in Presburger arithmetic (PA), the first-order theory of addition. As part of this result, they presented a procedure that translates any formula $φ$ of quantifier-free PA with remainder predicates (which has the same expressive power as full PA) into a population protocol with $2^{O(\text{poly}(|φ|))}$ states that computes $φ$. More precisely, the number of states of the protocol is exponential in both the bit length of the largest coefficient in the formula, and the number of nodes of its syntax tree. In this paper, we prove that every formula $φ$ of quantifier-free PA with remainder predicates is computable by a leaderless population protocol with $O(\text{poly}(|φ|))$ states. Our proof is based on several new constructions, which may be of independent interest. Given a formula $φ$ of quantifier-free PA with remainder predicates, a first construction produces a succinct protocol (with $O(|φ|^3)$ leaders) that computes $φ$; this completes the work initiated in [STACS'18], where we constructed such protocols for a fragment of PA. For large enough inputs, we can get rid of these leaders. If the input is not large enough, then it is small, and we design another construction producing a succinct protocol with one leader that computes $φ$. Our last construction gets rid of this leader for small inputs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access