Researcher profile

Javen Qinfeng Shi

Javen Qinfeng Shi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

What Makes a Representation Good for Single-Cell Perturbation Prediction?

Single-cell perturbation modeling is fundamental for understanding and predicting cellular responses to genetic perturbations. However, existing approaches, from causal representation learning to foundation models, often struggle with an overlooked challenge: gene expression is dominated by perturbation-invariant information, while perturbation-specific signals are intrinsically sparse. As a result, learned representations either entangle invariant and perturbation-specific information, leading to spurious and non-generalizable predictors, or suppress perturbation-specific signals altogether, rendering them ineffective for prediction. To address this, we propose PerturbedVAE, a general framework designed to resolve this signal imbalance. The framework explicitly separates perturbation-specific information from dominant invariant structure and recovers causal representations to effectively utilize such information for prediction. We further provide an identifiability analysis that characterizes the conditions under which sparse perturbation effects can be reliably recovered, thereby clarifying how the framework can be concretely specified under such conditions. Empirically, PerturbedVAE achieves state-of-the-art performance on a widely used benchmark across multiple evaluation settings, yielding significant gains on out-of-distribution combinatorial predictions and uncovering interpretable perturbation-response programs.

preprint2022arXiv

Active Learning by Feature Mixing

The promise of active learning (AL) is to reduce labelling costs by selecting the most valuable examples to annotate from a pool of unlabelled data. Identifying these examples is especially challenging with high-dimensional data (e.g. images, videos) and in low-data regimes. In this paper, we propose a novel method for batch AL called ALFA-Mix. We identify unlabelled instances with sufficiently-distinct features by seeking inconsistencies in predictions resulting from interventions on their representations. We construct interpolations between representations of labelled and unlabelled instances then examine the predicted labels. We show that inconsistencies in these predictions help discovering features that the model is unable to recognise in the unlabelled instances. We derive an efficient implementation based on a closed-form solution to the optimal interpolation causing changes in predictions. Our method outperforms all recent AL approaches in 30 different settings on 12 benchmarks of images, videos, and non-visual data. The improvements are especially significant in low-data regimes and on self-trained vision transformers, where ALFA-Mix outperforms the state-of-the-art in 59% and 43% of the experiments respectively.

preprint2022arXiv

Implicit Sample Extension for Unsupervised Person Re-Identification

Most existing unsupervised person re-identification (Re-ID) methods use clustering to generate pseudo labels for model training. Unfortunately, clustering sometimes mixes different true identities together or splits the same identity into two or more sub clusters. Training on these noisy clusters substantially hampers the Re-ID accuracy. Due to the limited samples in each identity, we suppose there may lack some underlying information to well reveal the accurate clusters. To discover these information, we propose an Implicit Sample Extension (\OurWholeMethod) method to generate what we call support samples around the cluster boundaries. Specifically, we generate support samples from actual samples and their neighbouring clusters in the embedding space through a progressive linear interpolation (PLI) strategy. PLI controls the generation with two critical factors, i.e., 1) the direction from the actual sample towards its K-nearest clusters and 2) the degree for mixing up the context information from the K-nearest clusters. Meanwhile, given the support samples, ISE further uses a label-preserving loss to pull them towards their corresponding actual samples, so as to compact each cluster. Consequently, ISE reduces the "sub and mixed" clustering errors, thus improving the Re-ID performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method is effective and achieves state-of-the-art performance for unsupervised person Re-ID. Code is available at: \url{https://github.com/PaddlePaddle/PaddleClas}.

preprint2022arXiv

NTIRE 2022 Challenge on High Dynamic Range Imaging: Methods and Results

This paper reviews the challenge on constrained high dynamic range (HDR) imaging that was part of the New Trends in Image Restoration and Enhancement (NTIRE) workshop, held in conjunction with CVPR 2022. This manuscript focuses on the competition set-up, datasets, the proposed methods and their results. The challenge aims at estimating an HDR image from multiple respective low dynamic range (LDR) observations, which might suffer from under- or over-exposed regions and different sources of noise. The challenge is composed of two tracks with an emphasis on fidelity and complexity constraints: In Track 1, participants are asked to optimize objective fidelity scores while imposing a low-complexity constraint (i.e. solutions can not exceed a given number of operations). In Track 2, participants are asked to minimize the complexity of their solutions while imposing a constraint on fidelity scores (i.e. solutions are required to obtain a higher fidelity score than the prescribed baseline). Both tracks use the same data and metrics: Fidelity is measured by means of PSNR with respect to a ground-truth HDR image (computed both directly and with a canonical tonemapping operation), while complexity metrics include the number of Multiply-Accumulate (MAC) operations and runtime (in seconds).