BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jason Riedy

Jason Riedy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Mathematical SoftwarePerformance

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Proposed Consistent Exception Handling for the BLAS and LAPACK

Numerical exceptions, which may be caused by overflow, operations like division by 0 or sqrt(-1), or convergence failures, are unavoidable in many cases, in particular when software is used on unforeseen and difficult inputs. As more aspects of society become automated, e.g., self-driving cars, health monitors, and cyber-physical systems more generally, it is becoming increasingly important to design software that is resilient to exceptions, and that responds to them in a consistent way. Consistency is needed to allow users to build higher-level software that is also resilient and consistent (and so on recursively). In this paper we explore the design space of consistent exception handling for the widely used BLAS and LAPACK linear algebra libraries, pointing out a variety of instances of inconsistent exception handling in the current versions, and propose a new design that balances consistency, complexity, ease of use, and performance. Some compromises are needed, because there are preexisting inconsistencies that are outside our control, including in or between existing vendor BLAS implementations, different programming languages, and even compilers for the same programming language. And user requests from our surveys are quite diverse. We also propose our design as a possible model for other numerical software, and welcome comments on our design choices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Spatter: A Tool for Evaluating Gather / Scatter Performance

This paper describes a new benchmark tool, Spatter, for assessing memory system architectures in the context of a specific category of indexed accesses known as gather and scatter. These types of operations are increasingly used to express sparse and irregular data access patterns, and they have widespread utility in many modern HPC applications including scientific simulations, data mining and analysis computations, and graph processing. However, many traditional benchmarking tools like STREAM, STRIDE, and GUPS focus on characterizing only uniform stride or fully random accesses despite evidence that modern applications use varied sets of more complex access patterns. Spatter is an open-source benchmark that provides a tunable and configurable framework to benchmark a variety of indexed access patterns, including variations of gather/scatter that are seen in HPC mini-apps evaluated in this work. The design of Spatter includes tunable backends for OpenMP and CUDA, and experiments show how it can be used to evaluate 1) uniform access patterns for CPU and GPU, 2) prefetching regimes for gather/scatter, 3) compiler implementations of vectorization for gather/scatter, and 4) trace-driven "proxy patterns" that reflect the patterns found in multiple applications. The results from Spatter experiments show that GPUs typically outperform CPUs for these operations, and that Spatter can better represent the performance of some cache-dependent mini-apps than traditional STREAM bandwidth measurements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access