Researcher profile

Jasmine Bayrooti

Jasmine Bayrooti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Keep Your AI-es on the Road: Tackling Distracted Driver Detection with Convolutional Neural Networks and Targeted Data Augmentation

According to the World Health Organization, distracted driving is one of the leading cause of motor accidents and deaths in the world. In our study, we tackle the problem of distracted driving by aiming to build a robust multi-class classifier to detect and identify different forms of driver inattention using the State Farm Distracted Driving Dataset. We utilize combinations of pretrained image classification models, classical data augmentation, OpenCV based image preprocessing and skin segmentation augmentation approaches. Our best performing model combines several augmentation techniques, including skin segmentation, facial blurring, and classical augmentation techniques. This model achieves an approximately 15% increase in F1 score over the baseline, thus showing the promise in these techniques in enhancing the power of neural networks for the task of distracted driver detection.

preprint2020arXiv

Reading Between the Demographic Lines: Resolving Sources of Bias in Toxicity Classifiers

The censorship of toxic comments is often left to the judgment of imperfect models. Perspective API, a creation of Google technology incubator Jigsaw, is perhaps the most widely used toxicity classifier in industry; the model is employed by several online communities including The New York Times to identify and filter out toxic comments with the goal of preserving online safety. Unfortunately, Google's model tends to unfairly assign higher toxicity scores to comments containing words referring to the identities of commonly targeted groups (e.g., "woman,'' "gay,'' etc.) because these identities are frequently referenced in a disrespectful manner in the training data. As a result, comments generated by marginalized groups referencing their identities are often mistakenly censored. It is important to be cognizant of this unintended bias and strive to mitigate its effects. To address this issue, we have constructed several toxicity classifiers with the intention of reducing unintended bias while maintaining strong classification performance.