BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Jared Saia

Jared Saia appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and AlgorithmsCryptography and SecurityComputer Science and Game TheoryNetworking and Internet ArchitectureInformation Theorymath.IT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

16works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

16 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Resource Burning for Permissionless Systems

Proof-of-work puzzles and CAPTCHAS consume enormous amounts of energy and time. These techniques are examples of resource burning: verifiable consumption of resources solely to convey information. Can these costs be eliminated? It seems unlikely since resource burning shares similarities with "money burning" and "costly signaling", which are foundational to game theory, biology, and economics. Can these costs be reduced? Yes, research shows we can significantly lower the asymptotic costs of resource burning in many different settings. In this paper, we survey the literature on resource burning; take positions based on predictions of how the tool is likely to evolve; and propose several open problems targeted at the theoretical distributed-computing research community.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

ToGCom: An Asymmetric Sybil Defense

Proof-of-work (PoW) is one of the most common techniques to defend against Sybil attacks. Unfortunately, current PoW defenses have two main drawbacks. First, they require work to be done even in the absence of an attack. Second, during an attack, they require good identities (IDs) to spend as much as the attacker. Recent theoretical work by Gupta, Saia, and Young suggests the possibility of overcoming these two drawbacks. In particular, they describe a new algorithm, GMCom, that always ensures that a minority of IDs are Sybil. They show that rate at which all good IDs perform computation is $O(J_G + \sqrt{T(J_G+1)})$, where $J_G$ is the join rate of good IDs, and $T$ is the rate at which the adversary performs computation. Unfortunately, this cost bound only holds in the case where (1) GMCom always knows the join rate of good IDs; and (2) there is a fixed constant amount of time that separates join events by good IDs. Here, we present ToGCom, which removes these two shortcomings. To do so, we design and analyze a mechanism for estimating the join rate of good IDs; and also devise a new method for setting the computational cost to join the system. Additionally, we evaluate the performance of ToGCom alongside prior PoW-based defenses. Based on our experiments, we design heuristics that further improve the performance of ToGCom by up to $3$ orders of magnitude over these previous Sybil defenses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

TorBricks: Blocking-Resistant Tor Bridge Distribution

Tor is currently the most popular network for anonymous Internet access. It critically relies on volunteer nodes called bridges for relaying Internet traffic when a user's ISP blocks connections to Tor. Unfortunately, current methods for distributing bridges are vulnerable to malicious users who obtain and block bridge addresses. In this paper, we propose TorBricks, a protocol for distributing Tor bridges to n users, even when an unknown number t < n of these users are controlled by a malicious adversary. TorBricks distributes O(tlog(n)) bridges and guarantees that all honest users can connect to Tor with high probability after O(log(t)) rounds of communication with the distributor. We also extend our algorithm to perform privacy-preserving bridge distribution when run among multiple untrusted distributors. This not only prevents the distributors from learning bridge addresses and bridge assignment information, but also provides resistance against malicious attacks from a m/3 fraction of the distributors, where m is the number of distributors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Interactive Communication with Unknown Noise Rate

Alice and Bob want to run a protocol over a noisy channel, where a certain number of bits are flipped adversarially. Several results take a protocol requiring $L$ bits of noise-free communication and make it robust over such a channel. In a recent breakthrough result, Haeupler described an algorithm that sends a number of bits that is conjectured to be near optimal in such a model. However, his algorithm critically requires $a \ priori$ knowledge of the number of bits that will be flipped by the adversary. We describe an algorithm requiring no such knowledge. If an adversary flips $T$ bits, our algorithm sends $L + O\left(\sqrt{L(T+1)\log L} + T\right)$ bits in expectation and succeeds with high probability in $L$. It does so without any $a \ priori$ knowledge of $T$. Assuming a conjectured lower bound by Haeupler, our result is optimal up to logarithmic factors. Our algorithm critically relies on the assumption of a private channel. We show that privacy is necessary when the amount of noise is unknown.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Secure Multi-Party Computation in Large Networks

We describe scalable protocols for solving the secure multi-party computation (MPC) problem among a large number of parties. We consider both the synchronous and the asynchronous communication models. In the synchronous setting, our protocol is secure against a static malicious adversary corrupting less than a $1/3$ fraction of the parties. In the asynchronous setting, we allow the adversary to corrupt less than a $1/8$ fraction of parties. For any deterministic function that can be computed by an arithmetic circuit with $m$ gates, both of our protocols require each party to send a number of field elements and perform an amount of computation that is $\tilde{O}(m/n + \sqrt n)$. We also show that our protocols provide perfect and universally-composable security. To achieve our asynchronous MPC result, we define the \emph{threshold counting problem} and present a distributed protocol to solve it in the asynchronous setting. This protocol is load balanced, with computation, communication and latency complexity of $O(\log{n})$, and can also be used for designing other load-balanced applications in the asynchronous communication model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Secure Anonymous Broadcast

In anonymous broadcast, one or more parties want to anonymously send messages to all parties. This problem is increasingly important as a black-box in many privacy-preserving applications such as anonymous communication, distributed auctions, and multi-party computation. In this paper, we design decentralized protocols for anonymous broadcast that require each party to send (and compute) a polylogarithmic number of bits (and operations) per anonymous bit delivered with $O(\log n)$ rounds of communication. Our protocol is provably secure against traffic analysis, does not require any trusted party, and is completely load-balanced. The protocol tolerates up to $n/6$ statically-scheduled Byzantine parties that are controlled by a computationally unbounded adversary. Our main strategy for achieving scalability is to perform local communications (and computations) among a logarithmic number of parties. We provide simulation results to show that our protocol improves significantly over previous work. We finally show that using a common cryptographic tool in our protocol one can achieve practical results for anonymous broadcast.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Self-Healing Computation

In the problem of reliable multiparty computation (RC), there are $n$ parties, each with an individual input, and the parties want to jointly compute a function $f$ over $n$ inputs. The problem is complicated by the fact that an omniscient adversary controls a hidden fraction of the parties. We describe a self-healing algorithm for this problem. In particular, for a fixed function $f$, with $n$ parties and $m$ gates, we describe how to perform RC repeatedly as the inputs to $f$ change. Our algorithm maintains the following properties, even when an adversary controls up to $t \leq (\frac{1}{4} - ε) n$ parties, for any constant $ε>0$. First, our algorithm performs each reliable computation with the following amortized resource costs: $O(m + n \log n)$ messages, $O(m + n \log n)$ computational operations, and $O(\ell)$ latency, where $\ell$ is the depth of the circuit that computes $f$. Second, the expected total number of corruptions is $O(t (\log^{*} m)^2)$, after which the adversarially controlled parties are effectively quarantined so that they cause no more corruptions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Quorums Quicken Queries: Efficient Asynchronous Secure Multiparty Computation

We describe an asynchronous algorithm to solve secure multiparty computation (MPC) over n players, when strictly less than a 1/8 fraction of the players are controlled by a static adversary. For any function f over a field that can be computed by a circuit with m gates, our algorithm requires each player to send a number of field elements and perform an amount of computation that is O (m/n + \sqrt{n}). This significantly improves over traditional algorithms, which require each player to both send a number of messages and perform computation that is Ω(nm). Additionally, we define the threshold counting problem and present a distributed algorithm to solve it in the asynchronous communication model. Our algorithm is load balanced, with computation, communication and latency complexity of O(log n), and may be of independent interest to other applications with a load balancing goal in mind.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Self-Healing Algorithms of Byzantine Faults

Recent years have seen significant interest in designing networks that are self-healing in the sense that they can automatically recover from adversarial attacks. Previous work shows that it is possible for a network to automatically recover, even when an adversary repeatedly deletes nodes in the network. However, there have not yet been any algorithms that self-heal in the case where an adversary takes over nodes in the network. In this paper, we address this gap. In particular, we describe a communication network over n nodes that ensures the following properties, even when an adversary controls up to t <= (1/8 - ε)n nodes, for any non-negative ε. First, the network provides a point-to-point communication with bandwidth and latency costs that are asymptotically optimal. Second, the expected total number of message corruptions is O(t(log* n)^2) before the adversarially controlled nodes are effectively quarantined so that they cause no more corruptions. Empirical results show that our algorithm can reduce the bandwidth cost by up to a factor of 70.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The Power of Mediation in an Extended El Farol Game

A mediator implements a correlated equilibrium when it proposes a strategy to each player confidentially such that the mediator's proposal is the best interest for every player to follow. In this paper, we present a mediator that implements the best correlated equilibrium for an extended El Farol game with symmetric players. The extended El Farol game we consider incorporates both negative and positive network effects. We study the degree to which this type of mediator can decrease the overall social cost. In particular, we give an exact characterization of Mediation Value (MV) and Enforcement Value (EV) for this game. MV is the ratio of the minimum social cost over all Nash equilibria to the minimum social cost over all mediators, and EV is the ratio of the minimum social cost over all mediators to the optimal social cost. This sort of exact characterization is uncommon for games with both kinds of network effects. An interesting outcome of our results is that both the MV and EV values can be unbounded for our game.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Scalable Mechanisms for Rational Secret Sharing

We consider the classical secret sharing problem in the case where all agents are selfish but rational. In recent work, Kol and Naor show that, when there are two players, in the non-simultaneous communication model, i.e. when rushing is possible, there is no Nash equilibrium that ensures both players learn the secret. However, they describe a mechanism for this problem, for any number of players, that is an epsilon-Nash equilibrium, in that no player can gain more than epsilon utility by deviating from it. Unfortunately, the Kol and Naor mechanism, and, to the best of our knowledge, all previous mechanisms for this problem require each agent to send O(n) messages in expectation, where n is the number of agents. This may be problematic for some applications of rational secret sharing such as secure multi-party computation and simulation of a mediator. We address this issue by describing mechanisms for rational secret sharing that are designed for large n. Both of our results hold for n > 2, and are Nash equilbria, rather than just epsilon-Nash equilbria. Our first result is a mechanism for n-out-of-n rational secret sharing that is scalable in the sense that it requires each agent to send only an expected O(log n) bits. Moreover, the latency of this mechanism is O(log n) in expectation, compared to O(n) expected latency for the Kol and Naor result. Our second result is a mechanism for a relaxed variant of rational m-out-of-n secret sharing where m = Theta(n). It requires each processor to send O(log n) bits and has O(log n) latency. Both of our mechanisms are non-cryptographic, and are not susceptible to backwards induction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Breaking the O(n^2) Bit Barrier: Scalable Byzantine agreement with an Adaptive Adversary

We describe an algorithm for Byzantine agreement that is scalable in the sense that each processor sends only $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ bits, where $n$ is the total number of processors. Our algorithm succeeds with high probability against an \emph{adaptive adversary}, which can take over processors at any time during the protocol, up to the point of taking over arbitrarily close to a 1/3 fraction. We assume synchronous communication but a \emph{rushing} adversary. Moreover, our algorithm works in the presence of flooding: processors controlled by the adversary can send out any number of messages. We assume the existence of private channels between all pairs of processors but make no other cryptographic assumptions. Finally, our algorithm has latency that is polylogarithmic in $n$. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first algorithm to solve Byzantine agreement against an adaptive adversary, while requiring $o(n^{2})$ total bits of communication.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Combinatorial Auctions with Budgets

We consider budget constrained combinatorial auctions where bidder $i$ has a private value $v_i$, a budget $b_i$, and is interested in all the items in $S_i$. The value to agent $i$ of a set of items $R$ is $|R \cap S_i| \cdot v_i$. Such auctions capture adword auctions, where advertisers offer a bid for ads in response to an advertiser-dependent set of adwords, and advertisers have budgets. It is known that even of all items are identical and all budgets are public it is not possible to be truthful and efficient. Our main result is a novel auction that runs in polynomial time, is incentive compatible, and ensures Pareto-optimality for such auctions when the valuations are private and the budgets are public knowledge. This extends the result of Dobzinski et al. (FOCS 2008) for auctions of multiple {\sl identical} items and public budgets to single-valued {\sl combinatorial} auctions with public budgets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Improved Approximation Algorithms for Segment Minimization in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

he segment minimization problem consists of finding the smallest set of integer matrices that sum to a given intensity matrix, such that each summand has only one non-zero value, and the non-zeroes in each row are consecutive. This has direct applications in intensity-modulated radiation therapy, an effective form of cancer treatment. We develop three approximation algorithms for matrices with arbitrarily many rows. Our first two algorithms improve the approximation factor from the previous best of $1+\log_2 h $ to (roughly) $3/2 \cdot (1+\log_3 h)$ and $11/6\cdot(1+\log_4{h})$, respectively, where $h$ is the largest entry in the intensity matrix. We illustrate the limitations of the specific approach used to obtain these two algorithms by proving a lower bound of $\frac{(2b-2)}{b}\cdot\log_b{h} + \frac{1}{b}$ on the approximation guarantee. Our third algorithm improves the approximation factor from $2 \cdot (\log D+1)$ to $24/13 \cdot (\log D+1)$, where $D$ is (roughly) the largest difference between consecutive elements of a row of the intensity matrix. Finally, experimentation with these algorithms shows that they perform well with respect to the optimum and outperform other approximation algorithms on 77% of the 122 test cases we consider, which include both real world and synthetic data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

The Forgiving Graph: A distributed data structure for low stretch under adversarial attack

We consider the problem of self-healing in peer-to-peer networks that are under repeated attack by an omniscient adversary. We assume that, over a sequence of rounds, an adversary either inserts a node with arbitrary connections or deletes an arbitrary node from the network. The network responds to each such change by quick "repairs," which consist of adding or deleting a small number of edges. These repairs essentially preserve closeness of nodes after adversarial deletions, without increasing node degrees by too much, in the following sense. At any point in the algorithm, nodes $v$ and $w$ whose distance would have been $\ell$ in the graph formed by considering only the adversarial insertions (not the adversarial deletions), will be at distance at most $\ell \log n$ in the actual graph, where $n$ is the total number of vertices seen so far. Similarly, at any point, a node $v$ whose degree would have been $d$ in the graph with adversarial insertions only, will have degree at most 3d in the actual graph. Our algorithm is completely distributed and has low latency and bandwidth requirements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Picking up the Pieces: Self-Healing in Reconfigurable Networks

We consider the problem of self-healing in networks that are reconfigurable in the sense that they can change their topology during an attack. Our goal is to maintain connectivity in these networks, even in the presence of repeated adversarial node deletion, by carefully adding edges after each attack. We present a new algorithm, DASH, that provably ensures that: 1) the network stays connected even if an adversary deletes up to all nodes in the network; and 2) no node ever increases its degree by more than 2 log n, where n is the number of nodes initially in the network. DASH is fully distributed; adds new edges only among neighbors of deleted nodes; and has average latency and bandwidth costs that are at most logarithmic in n. DASH has these properties irrespective of the topology of the initial network, and is thus orthogonal and complementary to traditional topology-based approaches to defending against attack. We also prove lower-bounds showing that DASH is asymptotically optimal in terms of minimizing maximum degree increase over multiple attacks. Finally, we present empirical results on power-law graphs that show that DASH performs well in practice, and that it significantly outperforms naive algorithms in reducing maximum degree increase. We also present empirical results on performance of our algorithms and a new heuristic with regard to stretch (increase in shortest path lengths).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access