BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Janne M. J. Huttunen

Janne M. J. Huttunen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SPMachine Learningphysics.comp-phNetworking and Internet Architecturephysics.geo-phphysics.med-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

DeepTx: Deep Learning Beamforming with Channel Prediction

Machine learning algorithms have recently been considered for many tasks in the field of wireless communications. Previously, we have proposed the use of a deep fully convolutional neural network (CNN) for receiver processing and shown it to provide considerable performance gains. In this study, we focus on machine learning algorithms for the transmitter. In particular, we consider beamforming and propose a CNN which, for a given uplink channel estimate as input, outputs downlink channel information to be used for beamforming. The CNN is trained in a supervised manner considering both uplink and downlink transmissions with a loss function that is based on UE receiver performance. The main task of the neural network is to predict the channel evolution between uplink and downlink slots, but it can also learn to handle inefficiencies and errors in the whole chain, including the actual beamforming phase. The provided numerical experiments demonstrate the improved beamforming performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Waveform Learning for Reduced Out-of-Band Emissions Under a Nonlinear Power Amplifier

Machine learning (ML) has shown great promise in optimizing various aspects of the physical layer processing in wireless communication systems. In this paper, we use ML to learn jointly the transmit waveform and the frequency-domain receiver. In particular, we consider a scenario where the transmitter power amplifier is operating in a nonlinear manner, and ML is used to optimize the waveform to minimize the out-of-band emissions. The system also learns a constellation shape that facilitates pilotless detection by the simultaneously learned receiver. The simulation results show that such an end-to-end optimized system can communicate data more accurately and with less out-of-band emissions than conventional systems, thereby demonstrating the potential of ML in optimizing the air interface. To the best of our knowledge, there are no prior works considering the power amplifier induced emissions in an end-to-end learned system. These findings pave the way towards an ML-native air interface, which could be one of the building blocks of 6G.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

DeepRx: Fully Convolutional Deep Learning Receiver

Deep learning has solved many problems that are out of reach of heuristic algorithms. It has also been successfully applied in wireless communications, even though the current radio systems are well-understood and optimal algorithms exist for many tasks. While some gains have been obtained by learning individual parts of a receiver, a better approach is to jointly learn the whole receiver. This, however, often results in a challenging nonlinear problem, for which the optimal solution is infeasible to implement. To this end, we propose a deep fully convolutional neural network, DeepRx, which executes the whole receiver pipeline from frequency domain signal stream to uncoded bits in a 5G-compliant fashion. We facilitate accurate channel estimation by constructing the input of the convolutional neural network in a very specific manner using both the data and pilot symbols. Also, DeepRx outputs soft bits that are compatible with the channel coding used in 5G systems. Using 3GPP-defined channel models, we demonstrate that DeepRx outperforms traditional methods. We also show that the high performance can likely be attributed to DeepRx learning to utilize the known constellation points of the unknown data symbols, together with the local symbol distribution, for improved detection accuracy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A Bayesian-based approach to improving acoustic Born waveform inversion of seismic data for viscoelastic media

In seismic waveform inversion, the reconstruction of the subsurface properties is usually carried out using approximative wave propagation models to ensure computational efficiency. The viscoelastic nature of the subsurface is often unaccounted for, and two popular approximations--the acoustic and linearized Born inversion--are widely used. This leads to reconstruction errors since the approximations ignore realistic (physical) aspects of seismic wave propagation in the heterogeneous earth. In this study, we show that the Bayesian approximation error approach can be used to partially recover from errors, addressing elastic and viscous effects in acoustic Born inversion for viscoelastic media. The results of numerical examples indicate that neglecting the modelling errors induced by the approximations results in very poor recovery of the subsurface velocity fields.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Improving pulse transit time estimation of aortic PWV and blood pressure using machine learning and simulated training data

Recent developments in cardiovascular modelling allow us to simulate blood flow in an entire human body. Such model can also be used to create databases of virtual subjects, with sizes limited only by computational resources. In this work, we study if it is possible to estimate cardiovascular health indices using machine learning approaches. In particular, we carry out theoretical assessment of estimating aortic pulse wave velocity, diastolic and systolic blood pressure and stroke volume using pulse transit/arrival timings derived from photopletyshmography signals. For predictions, we train Gaussian process regression using a database of virtual subjects generated with a cardiovascular simulator. Simulated results provides theoretical assessment of accuracy for predictions of the health indices. For instance, aortic pulse wave velocity can be estimated with a high accuracy (r>0.9) when photopletyshmography is measured from left carotid artery using a combination of foot-to-foot pulse transmit time and peak location derived for the predictions. Similar accuracy can be reached for diastolic blood pressure, but predictions of systolic blood pressure are less accurate (r>0.75) and the stroke volume predictions are mostly contributed by heart rate.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access