BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jan Oliver Ringert

Jan Oliver Ringert contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software EngineeringRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
21works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

21 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Synthesizing a Lego Forklift Controller in GR(1): A Case Study

Reactive synthesis is an automated procedure to obtain a correct-by-construction reactive system from a given specification. GR(1) is a well-known fragment of linear temporal logic (LTL) where synthesis is possible using a polynomial symbolic algorithm. We conducted a case study to learn about the challenges that software engineers may face when using GR(1) synthesis for the development of a reactive robotic system. In the case study we developed two variants of a forklift controller, deployed on a Lego robot. The case study employs LTL specification patterns as an extension of the GR(1) specification language, an examination of two specification variants for execution scheduling, traceability from the synthesized controller to constraints in the specification, and generated counter strategies to support understanding reasons for unrealizability. We present the specifications we developed, our observations, and challenges faced during the case study.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Architecture and Behavior Modeling of Cyber-Physical Systems with MontiArcAutomaton

This book presents MontiArcAutomaton, a modeling language for architecture and be- havior modeling of Cyber-Physical Systems as interactive Component & Connector mod- els. MontiArcAutomaton extends the Architecture Description Language MontiArc with automata to describe component behavior. The modeling language MontiArcAutomaton provides syntactical elements for defin- ing automata with states, variables, and transitions inside MontiArc components. These syntactical elements and a basic set of well-formedness rules provide the syntax for a fam- ily of modeling languages for state-based behavior modeling in Component & Connector architectures. We present two concrete language profiles with additional well-formedness rules to model time-synchronous component behavior and untimed, event-driven behav- ior of components. This book gives an overview of the MontiArcAutomaton language including examples, a language reference, and a context-free grammar for MontiArcAutomaton models. It also provides syntax definition, well-formedness rules, and semantics for two language profiles. We summarize projects and case studies applying MontiArcAutomaton. MontiArcAutomaton is implemented using the DSL framework MontiCore. Available tools include a textual editor with syntax highlighting and code completion as well as a graphical editor and a powerful and extensible code generation framework for target languages including EMF, Java, Mona, and Python.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Behavioral Compatibility of Simulink Models for Product Line Maintenance and Evolution

Embedded software systems, e.g. automotive, robotic or automation systems are highly configurable and consist of many software components being available in different variants and versions. To identify the degree of reusability between these different occurrences of a component, it is necessary to determine the functional backward and forward compatibility between them. Based on this information it is possible to identify in which system context a component can be replaced safely by another version, e.g. exchanging an older component, or variant, e.g. introducing new features, to achieve the same functionality. This paper presents a model checking approach to determine behavioral compatibility of Simulink models, obtained from different component variants or during evolution. A prototype for automated compatibility checking demonstrates its feasibility. In addition implemented optimizations make the analysis more efficient, when the compared variants or versions are structurally similar. A case study on a driver assistance system provided by Daimler AG shows the effectiveness of the approach to automatically compare Simulink components.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Code Generator Composition for Model-Driven Engineering of Robotics Component & Connector Systems

Engineering software for robotics applications requires multidomain and application-specific solutions. Model-driven engineering and modeling language integration provide means for developing specialized, yet reusable models of robotics software architectures. Code generators transform these platform independent models into executable code specific to robotic platforms. Generative software engineering for multidomain applications requires not only the integration of modeling languages but also the integration of validation mechanisms and code generators. In this paper we sketch a conceptual model for code generator composition and show an instantiation of this model in the MontiArc- Automaton framework. MontiArcAutomaton allows modeling software architectures as component and connector models with different component behavior modeling languages. Effective means for code generator integration are a necessity for the post hoc integration of applicationspecific languages in model-based robotics software engineering.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Manifesto for Semantic Model Differencing

Models are heavily used in software engineering and together with their systems they evolve over time. Thus, managing their changes is an important challenge for system maintainability. Existing approaches to model differencing concentrate on heuristics matching between model elements and on finding and presenting differences at a concrete or abstract syntactic level. While showing some success, these approaches are inherently limited to comparing syntactic structures. This paper is a manifesto for research on semantic model differencing. We present our vision to develop semantic diff operators for model comparisons: operators whose input consists of two models and whose output is a set of diff witnesses, instances of one model that are not instances of the other. In particular, if the models are syntactically different but there are no diff witnesses, the models are semantically equivalent. We demonstrate our vision using two concrete diff operators, for class diagrams and for activity diagrams. We motivate the use of semantic diff operators, brie y discuss the algorithms to compute them, list related challenges, and show their application and potential use as new fundamental building blocks for change management in model-driven engineering.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Requirements Modeling Language for the Component Behavior of Cyber Physical Robotics Systems

Software development for robotics applications is a sophisticated endeavor as robots are inherently complex. Explicit modeling of the architecture and behavior of robotics application yields many advantages to cope with this complexity by identifying and separating logically and physically independent components and by hierarchically structuring the system under development. On top of component and connector models we propose modeling the requirements on the behavior of robotics software components using I/O! automata. This approach facilitates early simulation of requirements model, allows to subject these to formal analysis and to generate the software from them. In this paper, we introduce an extension of the architecture description language MontiArc to model the requirements on components with I/O!automata, which are defined in the spirit of Martin Glinz Statecharts for requirements modeling [10]. We furthermore present a case study based on a robotics application generated for the Lego NXT robotic platform.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

ADDiff: Semantic Differencing for Activity Diagrams

Activity diagrams (ADs) have recently become widely used in the modeling of workflows, business processes, and web-services, where they serve various purposes, from documentation, requirement definitions, and test case specifications, to simulation and code generation. As models, programs, and systems evolve over time, understanding changes and their impact is an important challenge, which has attracted much research efforts in recent years. In this paper we present addiff, a semantic differencing operator for ADs. Unlike most existing approaches to model comparison, which compare the concrete or the abstract syntax of two given diagrams and output a list of syntactical changes or edit operations, addiff considers the Semantics of the diagrams at hand and outputs a set of diff witnesses, each of which is an execution trace that is possible in the first AD and is not possible in the second. We motivate the use of addiff, formally define it, and show two algorithms to compute it, a concrete forward-search algorithm and a symbolic xpoint algorithm, implemented using BDDs and integrated into the Eclipse IDE. Empirical results and examples demonstrate the feasibility and unique contribution of addiff to the state-of-the-art in version comparison and evolution analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

An Interim Summary on Semantic Model Differencing

This position paper provides an interim summary on the goals and current state of our ongoing research project on semantic model differencing for software evolution. We describe the basics of semantic model differencing, give two examples from our recent work, and discuss future challenges in taking full advantage of the potential of semantic differencing techniques in the context of models' evolution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

An Operational Semantics for Activity Diagrams using SMV

This document defines an operational semantics for activity diagrams (ADs) using a translation to SMV. The translation is inspired by the work of Eshuis [Esh06] and extends it with support for data. Each execution step of the SMV module obtained from an AD represents an executed action of this AD with interleaved execution of concurrent branches. An implementation of the given translation was used in the context of semantic differencing for ADs [MRR11]. We define the translation and give two examples, showing ADs and their complete representation in SMV.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Black-box Integration of Heterogeneous Modeling Languages for Cyber-Physical Systems

Robots belong to a class of Cyber-Physical Systems where complex software as a mobile device has to full tasks in a complex environment. Modeling robotics applications for analysis and code generation requires modeling languages for the logical software architecture and the system behavior. The MontiArcAutomaton modeling framework integrates six independently developed modeling languages to model robotics applications: a component & connector architecture description language, automata, I/O tables, class diagrams, OCL, and a Java DSL. We describe how we integrated these languages into MontiArcAutomaton a-posteriori in a black-box integration fashion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

CD2Alloy: Class Diagrams Analysis Using Alloy Revisited

We present CD2Alloy, a novel, powerful translation of UML class diagrams (CDs) to Alloy. Unlike existing translations, which are based on a shallow embedding strategy, and are thus limited to checking consistency and generating conforming object models of a single CD, and support a limited set of CD language features, CD2Alloy uses a deeper embedding strategy. Rather than mapping each CD construct to a semantically equivalent Alloy construct, CD2Alloy defines (some) CD constructs as new concepts within Alloy. This enables solving several analysis problems that involve more than one CD and could not be solved by earlier works, and supporting an extended list of CD language features. The ideas are implemented in a prototype Eclipse plug-in. The work advances the state-of-the-art in CD analysis, and can also be viewed as an interesting case study for the different possible translations of one modeling language to another, their strengths and weaknesses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

CDDiff: Semantic Differencing for Class Diagrams

Class diagrams (CDs), which specify classes and the relationships between them, are widely used for modeling the structure of object-oriented systems. As models, programs, and systems evolve over time, during the development lifecycle and beyond it, effective change management is a major challenge in software development, which has attracted much research efforts in recent years. In this paper we present cddiff, a semantic diff operator for CDs. Unlike most existing approaches to model comparison, which compare the concrete or the abstract syntax of two given diagrams and output a list of syntactical changes or edit operations, cddiff considers the semantics of the diagrams at hand and outputs a set of diff witnesses, each of which is an object model that is possible in the first CD and is not possible in the second. We motivate the use of cddiff, formally define it, and show how it is computed. The computation is based on a reduction to Alloy. The work is implemented in a prototype Eclipse plug-in. Examples show the unique contribution of our approach to the state-of-the-art in version comparison and evolution analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Modal Object Diagrams

While object diagrams (ODs) are widely used as a means to document object-oriented systems, they are expressively weak, as they are limited to describe specific possible snapshots of the system at hand. In this paper we introduce modal object diagrams (MODs), which extend the classical OD language with positive/negative and example/invariant modalities. The extended language allows the designer to specify not only positive example models but also negative examples, ones that the system should not allow, positive invariants, ones that all system's snapshots should include, and negative invariants, ones that no system snapshot is allowed to include. Moreover, as a primary application of the extended language we provide a formal verification technique that decides whether a given class diagram satisfies (i.e., models) a multi-modal object diagrams specification. In case of a negative answer, the technique outputs relevant counterexample object models, as applicable. The verification is based on a reduction to Alloy. The ideas are implemented in a prototype Eclipse plug-in. Examples show the usefulness of the extended language in specifying structural requirements of object-oriented systems in an intuitive yet expressive way.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

MontiArc - Architectural Modeling of Interactive Distributed and Cyber-Physical Systems

This report presents MontiArc, a modeling language for the description of Component & Connector architectures. A component is a unit executing computations and/or storing data. Information flow between components is modeled via unidirectional connectors connecting typed, directed ports of the interfaces of components. Language features of the ADL MontiArc include hierarchical decomposition of components, subtyping by structural inheritance, component type definitions and reference declarations for reuse, generic component types and configurable components, syntactic sugar for connectors, and controlled implicit creation of connections and subcomponent declarations. This technical report gives an overview of the MontiArc language and is a reference for the MontiArc grammar intended to enable reuse and extension of MontiArc and MontiArc related tools. MontiArc is implemented using the DSL framework MontiCore. Available tools include an editor with syntax highlighting and code completion as well as a simulation framework with a Java code generator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

MontiArcAutomaton: Modeling Architecture and Behavior of Robotic Systems

Robotics poses a challenge for software engineering as the vast numbers of different robot platforms impose different requirements on robot control architectures. The platform dependent development of robotic applications impedes reusability and portability. The lack of reusability hampers broad propagation of robotics applications. The MontiArcAutomaton architecture and behavior modeling framework provides an integrated, platform independent structure and behavior modeling language with an extensible code generation framework. MontiArcAutomaton's central concept is encapsulation and decomposition known from Component & Connector Architecture Description Languages. This concept is extended from the modeling language to the code generation and target runtime framework to bridge the gap of platform specific and independent implementations along well designed interfaces. This facilitates the reuse of robot applications and makes their development more efficient.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Multi-Platform Generative Development of Component & Connector Systems using Model and Code Libraries

Component-based software engineering aims to reduce software development effort by reusing established components as building blocks of complex systems. Defining components in general-purpose programming languages restricts their reuse to platforms supporting these languages and complicates component composition with implementation details. The vision of model-driven engineering is to reduce the gap between developer intention and implementation details by lifting abstract models to primary development artifacts and systematically transforming these into executable systems. For sufficiently complex systems the transformation from abstract models to platform-specific implementations requires augmentation with platform-specific components. We propose a model-driven mechanism to transform platform-independent logical component & connector architectures into platform-specific implementations combining model and code libraries. This mechanism allows to postpone commitment to a specific platform and thus increases reuse of software architectures and components.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Semantically Configurable Consistency Analysis for Class and Object Diagrams

Checking consistency between an object diagram (OD) and a class diagram (CD) is an important analysis problem. However, several variations in the semantics of CDs and ODs, as used in different contexts and for different purposes, create a challenge for analysis tools. To address this challenge in this paper we investigate semantically configurable model analysis. We formalize the variability in the languages semantics using a feature model: each configuration that the model permits induces a different semantics. Moreover, we develop a parametrized analysis that can be instantiated to comply with every legal configuration of the feature model. Thus, the analysis is semantically congured and its results change according to the semantics induced by the selected feature configuration. The ideas are implemented using a parametrized transformation to Alloy. The work can be viewed as a case study example for a formal and automated approach to handling semantic variability in modeling languages.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Summarizing Semantic Model Differences

Fundamental building blocks for managing and understanding software evolution in the context of model-driven engineering are differencing operators one can use for model comparisons. Semantic model differencing deals with the definition and computation of semantic diff operators for model comparison, operators whose input consists of two models and whose output is a set of diff witnesses, instances of one model that are not instances of the other. However, in many cases the complete set of diff witnesses is too large to be efficiently computed and effectively presented. Moreover, many of the witnesses are very similar and hence not interesting. Thus, an important challenge of semantic differencing relates to witness selection and presentation. In this paper we propose to address this challenge using a summarization technique, based on a notion of equivalence that partitions the set of diff witnesses. The result of the computation is a summary set, consisting of a single representative witness from each equivalence class. We demonstrate our ideas using two concrete diff operators, for class diagrams and for activity diagrams, where the computation of the summary set is efficient and does not require the enumeration of all witnesses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

System Model-Based Definition of Modeling Language Semantics

In this paper, we present an approach to define the semantics for object-oriented modeling languages. One important property of this semantics is to support underspecified and incomplete models. To this end, semantics is given as predicates over elements of the semantic domain. This domain is called the system model which is a general declarative characterization of object systems. The system model is very detailed since it captures various relevant structural, behavioral, and interaction aspects. This allows us to re-use the system model as a domain for various kinds of object-oriented modeling languages. As a major consequence the integration of language semantics is straight-forward. The whole approach is supported by tools that do not constrain the semantics definition's expressiveness and flexibility while making it machinecheckable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Towards Architectural Programming of Embedded Systems

Integrating architectural elements with a modern programming language is essential to ensure a smooth combination of architectural design and programming. In this position statement, we motivate a combination of architectural description for distributed, asynchronously communicating systems and Java as an example for such an integration. The result is an ordinary programming language, that exhibits architecture, data structure and behavior within one view. Mappings or tracing between different views is unnecessary. A prototypical implementation of a compiler demonstrates the possibilities and challenges of architectural programming.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Verifying Component and Connector Models against Crosscutting Structural Views

The structure of component and connector (C&C) models, which are used in many application domains of software engineering, consists of components at different containment levels, their typed input and output ports, and the connectors between them. C&C views, presented in [24], can be used to specify structural properties of C&C models in an expressive and intuitive way. In this work we address the verification of a C&C model against a C&C view and present efficient (polynomial) algorithms to decide satisfaction. A unique feature of our work, not present in existing approaches to checking structural properties of C&C models, is the generation of witnesses for satisfaction/non-satisfaction and of short naturallanguage texts, which serve to explain and formally justify the verification results and point the engineer to its causes. A prototype tool and an evaluation over four example systems with multiple views, performance and scalability experiments, as well as a user study of the usefulness of the witnesses for engineers, demonstrate the contribution of our work to the state-of-the-art in component and connector modeling and analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access