BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

James A. Brofos

James A. Brofos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ComputationMachine LearningMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Geometric Ergodicity in Modified Variations of Riemannian Manifold and Lagrangian Monte Carlo

Riemannian manifold Hamiltonian (RMHMC) and Lagrangian Monte Carlo (LMC) have emerged as powerful methods of Bayesian inference. Unlike Euclidean Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (EHMC) and the Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA), the geometric ergodicity of these Riemannian algorithms has not been extensively studied. On the other hand, the manifold Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MMALA) has recently been shown to exhibit geometric ergodicity under certain conditions. This work investigates the mixture of the LMC and RMHMC transition kernels with MMALA in order to equip the resulting method with an "inherited" geometric ergodicity theory. We motivate this mixture kernel based on an analogy between single-step HMC and MALA. We then proceed to evaluate the original and modified transition kernels on several benchmark Bayesian inference tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Several Remarks on the Numerical Integrator in Lagrangian Monte Carlo

Riemannian manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (RMHMC) is a powerful method of Bayesian inference that exploits underlying geometric information of the posterior distribution in order to efficiently traverse the parameter space. However, the form of the Hamiltonian necessitates complicated numerical integrators, such as the generalized leapfrog method, that preserve the detailed balance condition. The distinguishing feature of these numerical integrators is that they involve solutions to implicitly defined equations. Lagrangian Monte Carlo (LMC) proposes to eliminate the fixed point iterations by transitioning from the Hamiltonian formalism to Lagrangian dynamics, wherein a fully explicit integrator is available. This work makes several contributions regarding the numerical integrator used in LMC. First, it has been claimed in the literature that the integrator is only first-order accurate for the Lagrangian equations of motion; to the contrary, we show that the LMC integrator enjoys second order accuracy. Second, the current conception of LMC requires four determinant computations in every step in order to maintain detailed balance; we propose a simple modification to the integration procedure in LMC in order to reduce the number of determinant computations from four to two while still retaining a fully explicit numerical integration scheme. Third, we demonstrate that the LMC integrator enjoys a certain robustness to human error that is not shared with the generalized leapfrog integrator, which can invalidate detailed balance in the latter case. We discuss these contributions within the context of several benchmark Bayesian inference tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Non-Canonical Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Hamiltonian Monte Carlo is typically based on the assumption of an underlying canonical symplectic structure. Numerical integrators designed for the canonical structure are incompatible with motion generated by non-canonical dynamics. These non-canonical dynamics, motivated by examples in physics and symplectic geometry, correspond to techniques such as preconditioning which are routinely used to improve algorithmic performance. Indeed, recently, a special case of non-canonical structure, magnetic Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, was demonstrated to provide advantageous sampling properties. We present a framework for Hamiltonian Monte Carlo using non-canonical symplectic structures. Our experimental results demonstrate sampling advantages associated to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with non-canonical structure. To summarize our contributions: (i) we develop non-canonical HMC from foundations in symplectic geomtry; (ii) we construct an HMC procedure using implicit integration that satisfies the detailed balance; (iii) we propose to accelerate the sampling using an {\em approximate} explicit methodology; (iv) we study two novel, randomly-generated non-canonical structures: magnetic momentum and the coupled magnet structure, with implicit and explicit integration.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access