Researcher profile

Jakub Przybyło

Jakub Przybyło contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

math.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author

4works

0followers

1topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

A note on the conflict-free chromatic index

Let $G$ be a graph with maximum degree $Δ$ and without isolated vertices. An edge colouring $c$ of $G$ is conflict-free if the closed neighbourhood of every edge includes a uniquely coloured element. The least number of colours admitting such $c$ is the conflict-free chromatic index of $G$, denoted by $χ'_{CF}(G)$. In "Conflict-free chromatic number versus conflict-free chromatic index" [J. Graph Theory, 2022; 99: 349--358] it was recently proved by means of the probabilistic method that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq C_1\log_2Δ+C_2$, where $C_1>337$ and $C_2$ are constants, whereas there are families of graphs with $χ'_{CF}(G)\geq (1-o(1))\log_2Δ$. In this note we provide an explicit simple proof of the fact that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 3\log_2Δ+1$, which is a corollary of a stronger result: $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 3\log_2χ(G)+1$. For this aim we prove a few auxiliary observations, implying in particular that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 4$ for bipartite graphs.

preprint2022arXiv

On triangle-free list assignments

We show that Bernshteyn's proof of the breakthrough result of Molloy that triangle-free graphs are choosable from lists of size $(1+o(1))Δ/\logΔ$ can be adapted to yield a stronger result. In particular one may prove that such list sizes are sufficient to colour any graph of maximum degree $Δ$ provided that vertices sharing a common colour in their lists do not induce a triangle in $G$, which encompasses all cases covered by Molloy's theorem. This was thus far known to be true for lists of size $(1000+o(1))Δ/\logΔ$, as implies a more general result due to Amini and Reed. We also prove that lists of length $2(r-2)Δ\log_2\log_2Δ/\log_2Δ$ are sufficient if one replaces the triangle by any $K_r$ with $r\geq 4$, pushing also slightly the multiplicative factor of $200r$ from Bernshteyn's result down to $2(r-2)$. All bounds presented are also valid within the more general setting of correspondence colourings.

preprint2020arXiv

Conflict-free chromatic number vs conflict-free chromatic index

A vertex coloring of a given graph $G$ is conflict-free if the closed neighborhood of every vertex contains a unique color (i.e. a color appearing only once in the neighborhood). The minimum number of colors in such a coloring is the conflict-free chromatic number of $G$, denoted $χ_{CF}(G)$. What is the maximum possible conflict-free chromatic number of a graph with a given maximum degree $Δ$? Trivially, $χ_{CF}(G)\leq χ(G)\leq Δ+1$, but it is far from optimal - due to results of Glebov, Szabó and Tardos, and of Bhyravarapu, Kalyanasundaram and Mathew, the answer in known to be $Θ\left(\ln^2Δ\right)$. We show that the answer to the same question in the class of line graphs is $Θ\left(\lnΔ\right)$ - that is, the extremal value of the conflict-free chromatic index among graphs with maximum degree $Δ$ is much smaller than the one for conflict-free chromatic number. The same result for $χ_{CF}(G)$ is also provided in the class of near regular graphs, i.e. graphs with minimum degree $δ\geq αΔ$.

preprint2020arXiv

The 1-2-3 Conjecture holds for graphs with large enough minimum degree

A simple graph more often than not contains adjacent vertices with equal degrees. This in particular holds for all pairs of neighbours in regular graphs, while a lot such pairs can be expected e.g. in many random models. Is there a universal constant $K$, say $K=3$, such that one may always dispose of such pairs from any given connected graph with at least three vertices by blowing its selected edges into at most $K$ parallel edges? This question was first posed in 2004 by Karoński, Łuczak and Thomason, who equivalently asked if one may assign weights $1,2,3$ to the edges of every such graph so that adjacent vertices receive distinct weighted degrees - the sums of their incident weights. This basic problem is commonly referred to as the 1-2-3 Conjecture nowadays, and has been addressed in multiple papers. Thus far it is known that weights $1,2,3,4,5$ are sufficient [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 100 (2010) 347-349]. We show that this conjecture holds if only the minimum degree $δ$ of a graph is large enough, i.e. when $δ= Ω(\logΔ)$, where $Δ$ denotes the maximum degree of the graph. The principle idea behind our probabilistic proof relies on associating random variables with a special and carefully designed distribution to most of the vertices of a given graph, and then choosing weights for major part of the edges depending on the values of these variables in a deterministic or random manner.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint