Researcher profile

Jaikumar Radhakrishnan

Jaikumar Radhakrishnan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Set membership with two classical and quantum bit probes

We consider the following problem: Given a set S of at most n elements from a universe of size m, represent it in memory as a bit string so that membership queries of the form "Is x in S?" can be answered by making at most t probes into the bit string. Let s(m,n,t) be the minimum number of bits needed by any such scheme. We obtain new upper bounds for s(m,n,t=2), which match or improve all the previously known bounds. We also consider the quantum version of this problem and obtain improved upper bounds.

preprint2016arXiv

Partition bound is quadratically tight for product distributions

Let $f : \{0,1\}^n \times \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ be a 2-party function. For every product distribution $μ$ on $\{0,1\}^n \times \{0,1\}^n$, we show that $$\mathsf{CC}^μ_{0.49}(f) = O\left(\left(\log \mathsf{prt}_{1/8}(f) \cdot \log \log \mathsf{prt}_{1/8}(f)\right)^2\right),$$ where $\mathsf{CC}^μ_\varepsilon(f)$ is the distributional communication complexity of $f$ with error at most $\varepsilon$ under the distribution $μ$ and $\mathsf{prt}_{1/8}(f)$ is the {\em partition bound} of $f$, as defined by Jain and Klauck [{\em Proc. 25th CCC}, 2010]. We also prove a similar bound in terms of $\mathsf{IC}_{1/8}(f)$, the {\em information complexity} of $f$, namely, $$\mathsf{CC}^μ_{0.49}(f) = O\left(\left(\mathsf{IC}_{1/8}(f) \cdot \log \mathsf{IC}_{1/8}(f)\right)^2\right).$$ The latter bound was recently and independently established by Kol [{\em Proc. 48th STOC}, 2016] using a different technique. We show a similar result for query complexity under product distributions. Let $g : \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ be a function. For every bit-wise product distribution $μ$ on $\{0,1\}^n$, we show that $$\mathsf{QC}^μ_{0.49}(g) = O\left(\left( \log \mathsf{qprt}_{1/8}(g) \cdot \log \log\mathsf{qprt}_{1/8}(g) \right)^2 \right),$$ where $\mathsf{QC}^μ_{\varepsilon}(g)$ is the distributional query complexity of $f$ with error at most $\varepsilon$ under the distribution $μ$ and $\mathsf{qprt}_{1/8}(g))$ is the {\em query partition bound} of the function $g$. Partition bounds were introduced (in both communication complexity and query complexity models) to provide LP-based lower bounds for randomized communication complexity and randomized query complexity. Our results demonstrate that these lower bounds are polynomially tight for {\em product} distributions.

preprint2010arXiv

An entropy based proof of the Moore bound for irregular graphs

We provide proofs of the following theorems by considering the entropy of random walks: Theorem 1.(Alon, Hoory and Linial) Let G be an undirected simple graph with n vertices, girth g, minimum degree at least 2 and average degree d: Odd girth: If g=2r+1,then n \geq 1 + d*(\Sum_{i=0}^{r-1}(d-1)^i) Even girth: If g=2r,then n \geq 2*(\Sum_{i=0}^{r-1} (d-1)^i) Theorem 2.(Hoory) Let G = (V_L,V_R,E) be a bipartite graph of girth g = 2r, with n_L = |V_L| and n_R = |V_R|, minimum degree at least 2 and the left and right average degrees d_L and d_R. Then, n_L \geq \Sum_{i=0}^{r-1}(d_R-1)^{i/2}(d_L-1)^{i/2} n_R \geq \Sum_{i=0}^{r-1}(d_L-1)^{i/2}(d_R-1)^{i/2}