Source author record

Jacopo Di Iorio

Jacopo Di Iorio appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Contrasting pre-vaccine COVID-19 waves in Italy through Functional Data Analysis

We use data from 107 Italian provinces to characterize and compare mortality patterns in the first two COVID-19 epidemic waves, which occurred prior to the introduction of vaccines. We also associate these patterns with mobility, timing of government restrictions, and socio-demographic, infrastructural, and environmental covariates. Notwithstanding limitations in the accuracy and reliability of publicly available data, we are able to exploit information in curves and shapes through Functional Data Analysis techniques. Specifically, we document differences in magnitude and variability between the two waves; while both were characterized by a co-occurrence of 'exponential' and 'mild' mortality patterns, the second spread much more broadly and asynchronously through the country. Moreover, we find evidence of a significant positive association between local mobility and mortality in both epidemic waves and corroborate the effectiveness of timely restrictions in curbing mortality. The techniques we describe could capture additional signals of interest if applied, for instance, to data on cases and positivity rates. However, we show that the quality of such data, at least in the case of Italian provinces, was too poor to support meaningful analyses.

preprint2019arXiv

On the bias of H-scores for comparing biclusters, and how to correct it

In the last two decades several biclustering methods have been developed as new unsupervised learning techniques to simultaneously cluster rows and columns of a data matrix. These algorithms play a central role in contemporary machine learning and in many applications, e.g. to computational biology and bioinformatics. The H-score is the evaluation score underlying the seminal biclustering algorithm by Cheng and Church, as well as many other subsequent biclustering methods. In this paper, we characterize a potentially troublesome bias in this score, that can distort biclustering results. We prove, both analytically and by simulation, that the average H-score increases with the number of rows/columns in a bicluster. This makes the H-score, and hence all algorithms based on it, biased towards small clusters. Based on our analytical proof, we are able to provide a straightforward way to correct this bias, allowing users to accurately compare biclusters.