Source author record

Jacob Focke

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

3 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Counting Small Induced Subgraphs with Hereditary Properties

We study the computational complexity of the problem #IndSub(Φ)\#\text{IndSub}(Φ) of counting kk-vertex induced subgraphs of a graph GG that satisfy a graph property ΦΦ. Our main result establishes an exhaustive and explicit classification for all hereditary properties, including tight conditional lower bounds under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH): - If a hereditary property ΦΦ is true for all graphs, or if it is true only for finitely many graphs, then #IndSub(Φ)\#\text{IndSub}(Φ) is solvable in polynomial time. - Otherwise, #IndSub(Φ)\#\text{IndSub}(Φ) is #W[1]\#\mathsf{W[1]}-complete when parameterised by kk, and, assuming ETH, it cannot be solved in time f(k)⋅∣G∣o(k)f(k)\cdot |G|^{o(k)} for any function ff. This classification features a wide range of properties for which the corresponding detection problem (as classified by Khot and Raman [TCS 02]) is tractable but counting is hard. Moreover, even for properties which are already intractable in their decision version, our results yield significantly stronger lower bounds for the counting problem. As additional result, we also present an exhaustive and explicit parameterised complexity classification for all properties that are invariant under homomorphic equivalence. By covering one of the most natural and general notions of closure, namely, closure under vertex-deletion (hereditary), we generalise some of the earlier results on this problem. For instance, our results fully subsume and strengthen the existing classification of #IndSub(Φ)\#\text{IndSub}(Φ) for monotone (subgraph-closed) properties due to Roth, Schmitt, and Wellnitz [FOCS 20].

preprint2021arXiv

Counting Homomorphisms to K4K_4-minor-free Graphs, modulo 2

We study the problem of computing the parity of the number of homomorphisms from an input graph GG to a fixed graph HH. Faben and Jerrum [ToC'15] introduced an explicit criterion on the graph HH and conjectured that, if satisfied, the problem is solvable in polynomial time and, otherwise, the problem is complete for the complexity class ⊕P\oplus\mathrm{P} of parity problems. We verify their conjecture for all graphs HH that exclude the complete graph on 44 vertices as a minor. Further, we rule out the existence of a subexponential-time algorithm for the ⊕P\oplus\mathrm{P}-complete cases, assuming the randomised Exponential Time Hypothesis. Our proofs introduce a novel method of deriving hardness from globally defined substructures of the fixed graph HH. Using this, we subsume all prior progress towards resolving the conjecture (Faben and Jerrum [ToC'15]; Göbel, Goldberg and Richerby [ToCT'14,'16]). As special cases, our machinery also yields a proof of the conjecture for graphs with maximum degree at most 33, as well as a full classification for the problem of counting list homomorphisms, modulo 22.

preprint2020arXiv

The Complexity of Approximately Counting Retractions

Let GG be a graph that contains an induced subgraph HH. A retraction from GG to HH is a homomorphism from GG to HH that is the identity function on HH. Retractions are very well-studied: Given HH, the complexity of deciding whether there is a retraction from an input graph GG to HH is completely classified, in the sense that it is known for which HH this problem is tractable (assuming P≠NP\mathrm{P}\neq \mathrm{NP}). Similarly, the complexity of (exactly) counting retractions from GG to HH is classified (assuming FP≠#P\mathrm{FP}\neq \#\mathrm{P}). However, almost nothing is known about approximately counting retractions. Our first contribution is to give a complete trichotomy for approximately counting retractions to graphs of girth at least 55. Our second contribution is to locate the retraction counting problem for each HH in the complexity landscape of related approximate counting problems. Interestingly, our results are in contrast to the situation in the exact counting context. We show that the problem of approximately counting retractions is separated both from the problem of approximately counting homomorphisms and from the problem of approximately counting list homomorphisms --- whereas for exact counting all three of these problems are interreducible. We also show that the number of retractions is at least as hard to approximate as both the number of surjective homomorphisms and the number of compactions. In contrast, exactly counting compactions is the hardest of all of these exact counting problems.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.