Researcher profile

Jacob Buckman

Jacob Buckman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Neural Regression For Scale-Varying Targets

In this work, we demonstrate that a major limitation of regression using a mean-squared error loss is its sensitivity to the scale of its targets. This makes learning settings consisting of target's whose values take on varying scales challenging. A recently-proposed alternative loss function, known as histogram loss, avoids this issue. However, its computational cost grows linearly with the number of buckets in the histogram, which renders prediction with real-valued targets intractable. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach to training deep learning models on real-valued regression targets, autoregressive regression, which learns a high-fidelity distribution by utilizing an autoregressive target decomposition. We demonstrate that this training objective allows us to solve regression tasks involving targets with different scales.

preprint2023arXiv

When does return-conditioned supervised learning work for offline reinforcement learning?

Several recent works have proposed a class of algorithms for the offline reinforcement learning (RL) problem that we will refer to as return-conditioned supervised learning (RCSL). RCSL algorithms learn the distribution of actions conditioned on both the state and the return of the trajectory. Then they define a policy by conditioning on achieving high return. In this paper, we provide a rigorous study of the capabilities and limitations of RCSL, something which is crucially missing in previous work. We find that RCSL returns the optimal policy under a set of assumptions that are stronger than those needed for the more traditional dynamic programming-based algorithms. We provide specific examples of MDPs and datasets that illustrate the necessity of these assumptions and the limits of RCSL. Finally, we present empirical evidence that these limitations will also cause issues in practice by providing illustrative experiments in simple point-mass environments and on datasets from the D4RL benchmark.

preprint2022arXiv

Non-Markovian policies occupancy measures

A central object of study in Reinforcement Learning (RL) is the Markovian policy, in which an agent's actions are chosen from a memoryless probability distribution, conditioned only on its current state. The family of Markovian policies is broad enough to be interesting, yet simple enough to be amenable to analysis. However, RL often involves more complex policies: ensembles of policies, policies over options, policies updated online, etc. Our main contribution is to prove that the occupancy measure of any non-Markovian policy, i.e., the distribution of transition samples collected with it, can be equivalently generated by a Markovian policy. This result allows theorems about the Markovian policy class to be directly extended to its non-Markovian counterpart, greatly simplifying proofs, in particular those involving replay buffers and datasets. We provide various examples of such applications to the field of Reinforcement Learning.