BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

J. Singal

J. Singal contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Machine Learning Classification to Identify Catastrophic Outlier Photometric Redshift Estimates

We present results of using a basic binary classification neural network model to identify likely catastrophic outlier photometric redshift estimates of individual galaxies, based only on the galaxies' measured photometric band magnitude values. We find that a simple implementation of this classification can identify a significant fraction of galaxies with catastrophic outlier photometric redshift estimates while falsely categorizing only a much smaller fraction of non-outliers. These methods have the potential to reduce the errors introduced into science analyses by catastrophic outlier photometric redshift estimates.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The X-ray Luminosity Function Evolution of Quasars and the Correlation Between the X-ray and Ultraviolet Luminosities

We explore the evolution of the X-ray luminosity function of quasars and the intrinsic correlation between the X-ray and 2500Å$\,$ ultraviolet luminosities, utilizing techniques verified in previous works and a sample of over 4000 quasars detected with Chandra and XMM-Newton in the range $0<z<5$. We find that quasars have undergone significantly less evolution with redshift in their total X-ray luminosity than in other wavebands. We then determine that the best fit intrinsic power law correlation between the X-ray and ultraviolet luminosities, of the form $L&#39;_{\rm X} \propto ({L&#39;_{\rm UV}})^γ$, is $γ=0.28\pm$0.03, and we derive the luminosity function and density evolution in the X-ray band. We discuss the implications of these results for models of quasar systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Outlier Prediction and Training Set Modification to Reduce Catastrophic Outlier Redshift Estimates in Large-Scale Surveys

We present results of using individual galaxies&#39; probability distribution over redshift as a method of identifying potential catastrophic outliers in empirical photometric redshift estimation. In the course of developing this approach we develop a method of modification of the redshift distribution of training sets to improve both the baseline accuracy of high redshift (z>1.5) estimation as well as catastrophic outlier mitigation. We demonstrate these using two real test data sets and one simulated test data set spanning a wide redshift range (0<z<4). Results presented here inform an example `prescription&#39; that can be applied as a realistic photometric redshift estimation scenario for a hypothetical large-scale survey. We find that with appropriate optimization, we can identify a significant percentage (>30%) of catastrophic outlier galaxies while simultaneously incorrectly flagging only a small percentage (<7% and in many cases <3%) of non-outlier galaxies as catastrophic outliers. We find also that our training set redshift distribution modification results in a significant (>10) percentage point decrease of outlier galaxies for z>1.5 with only a small (<3) percentage point increase of outlier galaxies for z<1.5 compared to the unmodified training set. In addition, we find that this modification can in some cases cause a significant (~20) percentage point decrease of galaxies which are non-outliers but which have been incorrectly identified as outliers, while in other cases cause only a small (<1) percentage increase in this metric.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access