Researcher profile

J. P. McKeone

J. P. McKeone contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Methodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline

2works

0followers

1topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Discussion of: "A Bayesian information criterion for singular models"

Contributed discussion to the paper of Drton and Plummer (2017), presented before the Royal Statistical Society on 5th October 2016.

preprint2016arXiv

Investigation of the widely applicable Bayesian information criterion

The widely applicable Bayesian information criterion (WBIC) is a simple and fast approximation to the model evidence that has received little practical consideration. WBIC uses the fact that the log evidence can be written as an expectation, with respect to a powered posterior proportional to the likelihood raised to a power $t^*\in{(0,1)}$, of the log deviance. Finding this temperature value $t^*$ is generally an intractable problem. We find that for a particular tractable statistical model that the mean squared error of an optimally-tuned version of WBIC with correct temperature $t^*$ is lower than an optimally-tuned version of thermodynamic integration (power posteriors). However in practice WBIC uses the a canonical choice of $t=1/\log(n)$. Here we investigate the performance of WBIC in practice, for a range of statistical models, both regular models and singular models such as latent variable models or those with a hierarchical structure for which BIC cannot provide an adequate solution. Our findings are that, generally WBIC performs adequately when one uses informative priors, but it can systematically overestimate the evidence, particularly for small sample sizes.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint