Discussion of: "A Bayesian information criterion for singular models"
Contributed discussion to the paper of Drton and Plummer (2017), presented before the Royal Statistical Society on 5th October 2016.
Researcher profile
C. J. Oates
C. J. Oates contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Trust snapshot
Quick read
Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators
Actions
Decide how to stay connected
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
Building this graph slice
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
3 published item(s)
preprint2016arXiv
Investigation of the widely applicable Bayesian information criterion
The widely applicable Bayesian information criterion (WBIC) is a simple and fast approximation to the model evidence that has received little practical consideration. WBIC uses the fact that the log evidence can be written as an expectation, with respect to a powered posterior proportional to the likelihood raised to a power $t^*\in{(0,1)}$, of the log deviance. Finding this temperature value $t^*$ is generally an intractable problem. We find that for a particular tractable statistical model that the mean squared error of an optimally-tuned version of WBIC with correct temperature $t^*$ is lower than an optimally-tuned version of thermodynamic integration (power posteriors). However in practice WBIC uses the a canonical choice of $t=1/\log(n)$. Here we investigate the performance of WBIC in practice, for a range of statistical models, both regular models and singular models such as latent variable models or those with a hierarchical structure for which BIC cannot provide an adequate solution. Our findings are that, generally WBIC performs adequately when one uses informative priors, but it can systematically overestimate the evidence, particularly for small sample sizes.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv
Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics
Network models are widely used as structural summaries of biochemical systems. Statistical estimation of networks is usually based on linear or discrete models. However, the dynamics of these systems are generally nonlinear, suggesting that suitable nonlinear formulations may offer gains with respect to network inference and associated prediction problems. We present a general framework for both network inference and dynamical prediction that is rooted in nonlinear biochemical kinetics. This is done by considering a dynamical system based on a chemical reaction graph and associated kinetics parameters. Inference regarding both parameters and the reaction graph itself is carried out within a fully Bayesian framework. Prediction of dynamical behavior is achieved by averaging over both parameters and reaction graphs, allowing prediction even when the underlying reactions themselves are unknown or uncertain. Results, based on (i) data simulated from a mechanistic model of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and (ii) phosphoproteomic data from cancer cell lines, demonstrate that nonlinear formulations can yield gains in network inference and permit dynamical prediction in the challenging setting where the reaction graph is unknown.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access