Researcher profile

J. -P. Joost

J. -P. Joost contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Löwdin's symmetry dilemma within Green functions theory for the one-dimensional Hubbard model

The energy gap of correlated Hubbard clusters is well studied for one-dimensional systems using analytical methods and density-matrix-renormalization-group (DMRG) simulations. Beyond 1D, however, exact results are available only for small systems by quantum Monte Carlo. For this reason and, due to the problems of DMRG in simulating 2D and 3D systems, alternative methods such as Green functions combined with many-body approximations (GFMBA), that do not have this restriction, are highly important. However, it has remained open whether the approximate character of GFMBA simulations prevents the computation of the Hubbard gap. Here we present new GFMBA results that demonstrate that GFMBA simulations are capable of producing reliable data for the gap which agrees well with the DMRG benchmarks in 1D. An interesting observation is that the accuracy of the gap can be significantly increased when the simulations give up certain symmetry restriction of the exact system, such as spin symmetry and spatial homogeneity. This is seen as manifestation and generalization of the "symmetry dilemma" introduced by Löwdin for Hartree--Fock wave function calculations.

preprint2020arXiv

The G1--G2 Scheme: Dramatic Acceleration of Nonequilibrium Green Functions Simulations Within the Hartree--Fock-GKBA

The time evolution in quantum many-body systems after external excitations is attracting high interest in many fields. The theoretical modeling of these processes is challenging, and the only rigorous quantum-dynamics approach that can treat correlated fermions in two and three dimensions is nonequilibrium Green functions (NEGF). However, NEGF simulations are computationally expensive due to their $T^3$-scaling with the simulation duration $T$. Recently, $T^2$-scaling was achieved with the generalized Kadanoff--Baym ansatz (GKBA), for the second-order Born (SOA) selfenergy, which has substantially extended the scope of NEGF simulations. In a recent Letter [Schlünzen \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{124}, 076601 (2020)] we demonstrated that GKBA-NEGF simulations can be efficiently mapped onto coupled time-local equations for the single-particle and two-particle Green functions on the time diagonal, hence the method has been called G1--G2 scheme. This allows one to perform the same simulations with order $T^1$-scaling, both for SOA and $GW$ selfenergies giving rise to a dramatic speedup. Here we present more details on the G1--G2 scheme, including derivations of the basic equations including results for a general basis, for Hubbard systems and for jellium. Also, we demonstrate how to incorporate initial correlations into the G1--G2 scheme. Further, the derivations are extended to a broader class of selfenergies, including the $T$ matrix in the particle--particle and particle--hole channels, and the dynamically screened-ladder approximation. Finally, we demonstrate that, for all selfenergies, the CPU time scaling of the G1--G2 scheme with the basis dimension, $N_b$, can be improved compared to our first report: the overhead compared to the original GKBA, is not more than an additional factor $N_b$.