Source author record

J. D. Mitchell

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

10works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

10 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Topological Graph Inverse Semigroups

To every directed graph EE one can associate a \emph{graph inverse semigroup} G(E)G(E), where elements roughly correspond to possible paths in EE. These semigroups generalize polycylic monoids, and they arise in the study of Leavitt path algebras, Cohn path algebras, Cuntz-Krieger C∗C^*-algebras, and Toeplitz C∗C^*-algebras. We investigate topologies that turn G(E)G(E) into a topological semigroup. For instance, we show that in any such topology that is Hausdorff, G(E)∖{0}G(E)\setminus \{0\} must be discrete for any directed graph EE. On the other hand, G(E)G(E) need not be discrete in a Hausdorff semigroup topology, and for certain graphs EE, G(E)G(E) admits a T1T_1 semigroup topology in which G(E)∖{0}G(E)\setminus \{0\} is not discrete. We also describe, in various situations, the algebraic structure and possible cardinality of the closure of G(E)G(E) in larger topological semigroups.

preprint2015arXiv

The Structure of a Graph Inverse Semigroup

Given any directed graph E one can construct a graph inverse semigroup G(E), where, roughly speaking, elements correspond to paths in the graph. In this paper we study the semigroup-theoretic structure of G(E). Specifically, we describe the non-Rees congruences on G(E), show that the quotient of G(E) by any Rees congruence is another graph inverse semigroup, and classify the G(E) that have only Rees congruences. We also find the minimum possible degree of a faithful representation by partial transformations of any countable G(E), and we show that a homomorphism of directed graphs can be extended to a homomorphism (that preserves zero) of the corresponding graph inverse semigroups if and only if it is injective.

preprint2014arXiv

Ends of Semigroups

We define the notion of the partial order of ends of the Cayley graph of a semigroup. We prove that the structure of the ends of a semigroup is invariant under change of finite generating set and at the same time is inherited by subsemigroups and extensions of finite Rees index. We prove an analogue of Hopf's Theorem, stating that a group has 1, 2 or infinitely many ends, for left cancellative semigroups and that the cardinality of the set of ends is invariant in subsemigroups and extension of finite Green index in left cancellative semigroups.

preprint2014arXiv

The rank of the semigroup of transformations stabilising a partition of a finite set

Let P\mathcal{P} be a partition of a finite set XX. We say that a full transformation f:X→Xf:X\to X preserves (or stabilizes) the partition P\mathcal{P} if for all P∈PP\in \mathcal{P} there exists Q∈PQ\in \mathcal{P} such that Pf⊆QPf\subseteq Q. Let T(X,P)T(X,\mathcal{P}) denote the semigroup of all full transformations of XX that preserve the partition P\mathcal{P}. In 2005 Huisheng found an upper bound for the minimum size of the generating sets of T(X,P)T(X,\mathcal{P}), when P\mathcal{P} is a partition in which all of its parts have the same size. In addition, Huisheng conjectured that his bound was exact. In 2009 the first and last authors used representation theory to completely solve Hisheng's conjecture. The goal of this paper is to solve the much more complex problem of finding the minimum size of the generating sets of T(X,P)T(X,\mathcal{P}), when P\mathcal{P} is an arbitrary partition. Again we use representation theory to find the minimum number of elements needed to generate the wreath product of finitely many symmetric groups, and then use this result to solve the problem. The paper ends with a number of problems for experts in group and semigroup theories.

preprint2013arXiv

A finite interval in the subsemigroup lattice of the full transformation monoid

In this paper we describe a portion of the subsemigroup lattice of the \emph{full transformation semigroup} ΩΩΩ^Ω, which consists of all mappings on the countable infinite set ΩΩ. Gavrilov showed that there are five maximal subsemigroups of ΩΩΩ^Ω containing the symmetric group $\sym(Ω)$. The portion of the subsemigroup lattice of ΩΩΩ^Ω which we describe is that between the intersection of these five maximal subsemigroups and ΩΩΩ^Ω. We prove that there are only 38 subsemigroups in this interval, in contrast to the 22ℵ02^{2^{\aleph_0}} subsemigroups between $\sym(Ω)$ and ΩΩΩ^Ω.

preprint2013arXiv

Maximal subsemigroups of the semigroup of all mappings on an infinite set

In this paper we classify the maximal subsemigroups of the \emph{full transformation semigroup} ΩΩΩ^Ω, which consists of all mappings on the infinite set ΩΩ, containing certain subgroups of the symmetric group $\sym(Ω)$ on ΩΩ. In 1965 Gavrilov showed that there are five maximal subsemigroups of ΩΩΩ^Ω containing $\sym(Ω)$ when ΩΩ is countable and in 2005 Pinsker extended Gavrilov's result to sets of arbitrary cardinality. We classify the maximal subsemigroups of ΩΩΩ^Ω on a set ΩΩ of arbitrary infinite cardinality containing one of the following subgroups of $\sym(Ω)$: the pointwise stabiliser of a non-empty finite subset of ΩΩ, the stabiliser of an ultrafilter on ΩΩ, or the stabiliser of a partition of ΩΩ into finitely many subsets of equal cardinality. If GG is any of these subgroups, then we deduce a characterisation of the mappings f,g∈ΩΩf,g\in Ω^Ω such that the semigroup generated by G∪{f,g}G\cup \{f,g\} equals ΩΩΩ^Ω.

preprint2012arXiv

The Bergman-Shelah Preorder on Transformation Semigroups

Let $\nat^\nat$ be the semigroup of all mappings on the natural numbers $\nat$, and let UU and VV be subsets of $\nat^\nat$. We write U≼VU\preccurlyeq V if there exists a countable subset CC of $\nat^\nat$ such that UU is contained in the subsemigroup generated by VV and CC. We give several results about the structure of the preorder ≼\preccurlyeq. In particular, we show that a certain statement about this preorder is equivalent to the Continuum Hypothesis. The preorder ≼\preccurlyeq is analogous to one introduced by Bergman and Shelah on subgroups of the symmetric group on $\nat$. The results in this paper suggest that the preorder on subsemigroups of $\nat^\nat$ is much more complicated than that on subgroups of the symmetric group.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.