BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Ivo Hedtke

Ivo Hedtke appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.GRSymbolic Computationmath.NADiscrete Mathematicsmath.COMathematical Software

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
6topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

A Fast Search Algorithm for <m,m,m> Triple Product Property Triples and an Application for 5x5 Matrix Multiplication

We present a new fast search algorithm for <m,m,m> Triple Product Property (TPP) triples as defined by Cohn and Umans in 2003. The new algorithm achieves a speed-up factor of 40 up to 194 in comparison to the best known search algorithm. With a parallelized version of the new algorithm we are able to search for TPP triples in groups up to order 55. As an application we identify a list of groups that would realize 5x5 matrix multiplication with under 100 resp. 125 scalar multiplications (the best known upper bound by Makarov 1987 resp. the trivial upper bound) if they contain a <5,5,5> TPP triple. With our new algorithm we show that no group can realize 5x5 matrix multiplication better than Makarov's algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A Note on the Group-theoretic Approach to Fast Matrix Multiplication

In 2003 COHN and UMANS introduced a group-theoretic approach to fast matrix multiplication. This involves finding large subsets S, T and U of a group G satisfying the Triple Product Property (TPP) as a means to bound the exponent $ω$ of the matrix multiplication. We show that S, T and U may be be assumed to contain the identity and be otherwise disjoint. We also give a much shorter proof of the upper bound |S|+|T|+|U| <= |G|+2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Methods of Matrix Multiplication: An Overview of Several Methods and their Implementation

In this overview article we present several methods for multiplying matrices and the implementation of these methods in C. Also a little test program is given to compare their running time and the numerical stability. The methods are: naive method, naive method working on arrays, naive method with the \textsc{Kahan} trick, three methods with loop unrolling, winograd method and the scaled variant, original \textsc{Strassen} method and the \textsc{Strassen}-\textsc{Winograd} variant. Please note, that this is the FIRST version. The algorithms are not well tested and the implementation is not optimized. If you like to join the project, please contact me.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Search and test algorithms for Triple Product Property triples

In 2003 COHN and UMANS introduced a group-theoretic approach to fast matrix multiplication. This involves finding large subsets of a group $G$ satisfying the Triple Product Property (TPP) as a means to bound the exponent $ω$ of matrix multiplication. We present two new characterizations of the TPP, which are useful for theoretical considerations and for TPP test algorithms. With this we describe all known TPP tests and implement them in GAP algorithms. We also compare their runtime. Furthermore we show that the search for subgroup TPP triples of nontrivial size in a nonabelian group can be restricted to the set of all nonnormal subgroups of that group. Finally we describe brute-force search algorithms for maximal subgroup and subset TPP triples. In addition we present the results of the subset brute-force search for all groups of order less than 25 and selected results of the subgroup brute-force search for 2-groups, $SL(n,q)$ and $PSL(2,q)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Strassen's Matrix Multiplication Algorithm for Matrices of Arbitrary Order

The well known algorithm of Volker Strassen for matrix multiplication can only be used for $(m2^k \times m2^k)$ matrices. For arbitrary $(n \times n)$ matrices one has to add zero rows and columns to the given matrices to use Strassen's algorithm. Strassen gave a strategy of how to set $m$ and $k$ for arbitrary $n$ to ensure $n\leq m2^k$. In this paper we study the number $d$ of additional zero rows and columns and the influence on the number of flops used by the algorithm in the worst case ($d=n/16$), best case ($d=1$) and in the average case ($d\approx n/48$). The aim of this work is to give a detailed analysis of the number of additional zero rows and columns and the additional work caused by Strassen's bad parameters. Strassen used the parameters $m$ and $k$ to show that his matrix multiplication algorithm needs less than $4.7n^{\log_2 7}$ flops. We can show in this paper, that these parameters cause an additional work of approx. 20 % in the worst case in comparison to the optimal strategy for the worst case. This is the main reason for the search for better parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Upgrading Subgroup Triple Product Property Triples

In 2003 COHN and UMANS introduced a group-theoretic approach to fast matrix multiplication. This involves finding large subsets of a group $G$ satisfying the Triple Product Property (TPP) as a means to bound the exponent $ω$ of matrix multiplication. Recently, Hedtke and Murthy discussed several methods to find TPP triples. Because the search space for subset triples is too large, it is only possible to focus on subgroup triples. We present methods to upgrade a given TPP triple to a bigger TPP triple. If no upgrade is possible we use reduction methods (based on random experiments and heuristics) to create a smaller TPP triple that can be used as input for the upgrade methods. If we apply the upgrade process for subset triples after one step with the upgrade method for subgroup triples we achieve an enlargement of the triple size of 100 % in the best case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Using the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury Formula to Solve the System of Linear Equations from the Standard Multiple Shooting Method for a Linear Two Point Boundary-Value Problem is a Bad Idea

We use the standard multiple shooting method to solve a linear two point boundary-value problem. To ensure that the solution obtained by combining the partial solutions is continuous and satisfies the boundary conditions, we have to solve a system of linear equations. Our idea is to first solve a bidiagonal system related to the original system of linear equations, and then update it with the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula. We study the feasibility, the numerical stability and the running time of this method. The results are: The method described above has the same stability problems like the well known Condensing method. The running time analysis shows that the new method is slower than the Condensing method. Therefore we recommend not to use the method described in this article.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access