BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Itay Kaplan

Itay Kaplan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.LOmath.ACmath.COmath.CTmath.GR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

22works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

22 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Boolean Types in Dependent Theories

The notion of a complete type can be generalized in a natural manner to allow assigning a value in an arbitrary Boolean algebra B to each formula. We show some basic results regarding the effect of the properties of B on the behavior of such types, and show they are particularity well behaved in the case of NIP theories. In particular, we generalize the third author's result about counting types, as well as the notion of a smooth type and extending a type to a smooth one. We then show that Keisler measures are tied to certain Boolean types and show that some of the results can thus be transferred to measures - in particular, giving an alternative proof of the fact that every measure in a dependent theory can be extended to a smooth one. We also study the stable case. We consider this paper as an invitation for more research into the topic of Boolean types.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Exact saturation in pseudo-elementary classes for simple and stable theories

We study PC-exact saturation for stable and simple theories. Among other results, we show that PC-exact saturation characterizes the stability cardinals of size at least continuum of a countable stable theory and, additionally, that simple unstable theories have PC-exact saturation at singular cardinals, satisfying mild set-theoretic hypotheses, which had previously been open even for the random graph. We characterize supersimplicity of countable theories in terms of having PC-exact saturation at singular cardinals of countable cofinality. We also consider the local analogue of PC-exact saturation, showing that local PC-exact saturation for singular cardinals of countable cofinality characterizes supershort theories.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On algebraically closed fields with a distinguished subfield

This paper is concerned with the model-theoretic study of pairs $(K,F)$ where $K$ is an algebraically closed field and $F$ is a distinguished subfield of $K$ allowing extra structure. We study the basic model-theoretic properties of those pairs, such as quantifier elimination, model-completeness and saturated models. We also prove some preservation results of classification-theoretic notions such as stability, simplicity, NSOP$_1$, and NIP. As an application, we conclude that a PAC field is NSOP$_1$ iff its absolute Galois group is (as a profinite group).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Forcing a countable structure to belong to the ground model

Suppose that $P$ is a forcing notion, $L$ is a language (in $V$), $\dotτ$ a $P$-name such that $P\Vdash$ "$\dotτ$ is a countable $L$-structure". In the product $P\times P$, there are names $\dot{τ_{1}},\dot{τ_{2}}$ such that for any generic filter $G=G_{1}\times G_{2}$ over $P\times P$, $\dotτ_{1}[G]=\dotτ[G_{1}]$ and $\dotτ_{2}[G]=\dotτ[G_{2}]$. Zapletal asked whether or not $P \times P \Vdash \dotτ_{1}\cong\dotτ_{2}$ implies that there is some $M\in V$ such that $P \Vdash \dotτ\cong\check{M}$. We answer this negatively and discuss related issues.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On non-forking spectra

Non-forking is one of the most important notions in modern model theory capturing the idea of a generic extension of a type (which is a far-reaching generalization of the concept of a generic point of a variety). To a countable first-order theory we associate its non-forking spectrum - a function of two cardinals kappa and lambda giving the supremum of the possible number of types over a model of size lambda that do not fork over a sub-model of size kappa. This is a natural generalization of the stability function of a theory. We make progress towards classifying the non-forking spectra. On the one hand, we show that the possible values a non-forking spectrum may take are quite limited. On the other hand, we develop a general technique for constructing theories with a prescribed non-forking spectrum, thus giving a number of examples. In particular, we answer negatively a question of Adler whether NIP is equivalent to bounded non-forking. In addition, we answer a question of Keisler regarding the number of cuts a linear order may have. Namely, we show that it is possible that ded(kappa) < ded(kappa)^omega.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Strict independence

We investigate the notions of strict independence and strict non-forking, and establish basic properties and connections between the two. In particular it follows from our investigation that in resilient theories strict non-forking is symmetric. Based on this study, we develop notions of weight which characterize NTP2, dependence and strong dependence. Many of our proofs rely on careful analysis of sequences that witness dividing. We prove simple characterizations of such sequences in resilient theories, as well as of Morley sequences which are witnesses. As a by-product we obtain information on types co-dominated by generically stable types in dependent theories. For example, we prove that every Morley sequence in such a type is a witness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A dependent theory with few indiscernibles

We give a full solution to the question of existence of indiscernibles in dependent theories by proving the following theorem: for every $θ$ there is a dependent theory $T$ of size $θ$ such that for all $κ$ and $δ$, $κ\to\left(δ\right)_{T,1}$ iff $κ\to\left(δ\right)_θ^{<ω}$. This means that unless there are good set theoretical reasons, there are large sets with no indiscernible sequences.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Examples in dependent theories

In the first part we show a counterexample to a conjecture by Shelah regarding the existence of indiscernible sequences in dependent theories (up to the first inaccessible cardinal). In the second part we discuss generic pairs, and give an example where the pair is not dependent. Then we define the notion of directionality which deals with counting the number of coheirs of a type and we give examples of the different possibilities. Then we discuss non-splintering, an interesting notion that appears in the work of Rami Grossberg, Andrés Villaveces and Monica VanDieren, and we show that it is not trivial (in the sense that it can be different than splitting) whenever the directionality of the theory is not small. In the appendix we study dense types in RCF.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Groups and fields with NTP2

NTP2 is a large class of first-order theories defined by Shelah and generalizing simple and NIP theories. Algebraic examples of NTP2 structures are given by ultra-products of p-adics and certain valued difference fields (such as a non-standard Frobenius automorphism living on an algebraically closed valued field of characteristic 0). In this note we present some results on groups and fields definable in NTP2 structures. Most importantly, we isolate a chain condition for definable normal subgroups and use it to show that any NTP2 field has only finitely many Artin-Schreier extensions. We also discuss a stronger chain condition coming from imposing bounds on burden of the theory (an appropriate analogue of weight), and show that every strongly dependent valued field is Kaplansky.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Automorphism towers and automorphism groups of fields without Choice

This paper can be viewed as a continuation of [KS09] that dealt with the automorphism tower problem without Choice. Here we deal with the inequation which connects the automorphism tower and the normalizer tower without Choice and introduce a new proof to a theorem of Fried and Kollár that any group can be represented as an automorphism group of a field. The proof uses a simple construction: working more in graph theory, and less in algebra.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The univalence axiom in posetal model categories

In this note we interpret Voevodsky's Univalence Axiom in the language of (abstract) model categories. We then show that any posetal locally Cartesian closed model category $Qt$ in which the mapping $Hom^{(w)}(Z\times B,C):Qt\longrightarrow Sets$ is functorial in $Z$ and represented in $Qt$ satisfies our homotopy version of the Univalence Axiom, albeit in a rather trivial way. This work was motivated by a question reported in [Ob], asking for a model of the Univalence Axiom not equivalent to the standard one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access