Researcher profile

Iraklis A. Klampanos

Iraklis A. Klampanos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Unsupervised Severe Weather Detection Via Joint Representation Learning Over Textual and Weather Data

When observing a phenomenon, severe cases or anomalies are often characterised by deviation from the expected data distribution. However, non-deviating data samples may also implicitly lead to severe outcomes. In the case of unsupervised severe weather detection, these data samples can lead to mispredictions, since the predictors of severe weather are often not directly observed as features. We posit that incorporating external or auxiliary information, such as the outcome of an external task or an observation, can improve the decision boundaries of an unsupervised detection algorithm. In this paper, we increase the effectiveness of a clustering method to detect cases of severe weather by learning augmented and linearly separable latent representations.We evaluate our solution against three individual cases of severe weather, namely windstorms, floods and tornado outbreaks.

preprint2020arXiv

WeLa-VAE: Learning Alternative Disentangled Representations Using Weak Labels

Learning disentangled representations without supervision or inductive biases, often leads to non-interpretable or undesirable representations. On the other hand, strict supervision requires detailed knowledge of the true generative factors, which is not always possible. In this paper, we consider weak supervision by means of high-level labels that are not assumed to be explicitly related to the ground truth factors. Such labels, while being easier to acquire, can also be used as inductive biases for algorithms to learn more interpretable or alternative disentangled representations. To this end, we propose WeLa-VAE, a variational inference framework where observations and labels share the same latent variables, which involves the maximization of a modified variational lower bound and total correlation regularization. Our method is a generalization of TCVAE, adding only one extra hyperparameter. We experiment on a dataset generated by Cartesian coordinates and we show that, while a TCVAE learns a factorized Cartesian representation, given weak labels of distance and angle, WeLa-VAE is able to learn and disentangle a polar representation. This is achieved without the need of refined labels or having to adjust the number of layers, the optimization parameters, or the total correlation hyperparameter.

preprint2018arXiv

Evidence Transfer for Improving Clustering Tasks Using External Categorical Evidence

In this paper we introduce evidence transfer for clustering, a deep learning method that can incrementally manipulate the latent representations of an autoencoder, according to external categorical evidence, in order to improve a clustering outcome. By evidence transfer we define the process by which the categorical outcome of an external, auxiliary task is exploited to improve a primary task, in this case representation learning for clustering. Our proposed method makes no assumptions regarding the categorical evidence presented, nor the structure of the latent space. We compare our method, against the baseline solution by performing k-means clustering before and after its deployment. Experiments with three different kinds of evidence show that our method effectively manipulates the latent representations when introduced with real corresponding evidence, while remaining robust when presented with low quality evidence.