BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Inês Lynce

Inês Lynce contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Exact and approximate determination of the Pareto set using minimal correction subsets

Recently, it has been shown that the enumeration of Minimal Correction Subsets (MCS) of Boolean formulas allows solving Multi-Objective Boolean Optimization (MOBO) formulations. However, a major drawback of this approach is that most MCSs do not correspond to Pareto-optimal solutions. In fact, one can only know that a given MCS corresponds to a Pareto-optimal solution when all MCSs are enumerated. Moreover, if it is not possible to enumerate all MCSs, then there is no guarantee of the quality of the approximation of the Pareto frontier. This paper extends the state of the art for solving MOBO using MCSs. First, we show that it is possible to use MCS enumeration to solve MOBO problems such that each MCS necessarily corresponds to a Pareto-optimal solution. Additionally, we also propose two new algorithms that can find a (1 + {\varepsilon})-approximation of the Pareto frontier using MCS enumeration. Experimental results in several benchmark sets show that the newly proposed algorithms allow finding better approximations of the Pareto frontier than state-of-the-art algorithms, and with guaranteed approximation ratios.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

New Core-Guided and Hitting Set Algorithms for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization

In the last decade, a plethora of algorithms for single-objective Boolean optimization has been proposed that rely on the iterative usage of a highly effective Propositional Satisfiability (SAT) solver. But the use of SAT solvers in Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization (MOCO) algorithms is still scarce. Due to this shortage of efficient tools for MOCO, many real-world applications formulated as multi-objective are simplified to single-objective, using either a linear combination or a lexicographic ordering of the objective functions to optimize. In this paper, we extend the state of the art of MOCO solvers with two novel unsatisfiability-based algorithms. The first is a core-guided MOCO solver. The second is a hitting set-based MOCO solver. Experimental results obtained in a wide range of benchmark instances show that our new unsatisfiability-based algorithms can outperform state-of-the-art SAT-based algorithms for MOCO.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

SOAR: A Synthesis Approach for Data Science API Refactoring

With the growth of the open-source data science community, both the number of data science libraries and the number of versions for the same library are increasing rapidly. To match the evolving APIs from those libraries, open-source organizations often have to exert manual effort to refactor the APIs used in the code base. Moreover, due to the abundance of similar open-source libraries, data scientists working on a certain application may have an abundance of libraries to choose, maintain and migrate between. The manual refactoring between APIs is a tedious and error-prone task. Although recent research efforts were made on performing automatic API refactoring between different languages, previous work relies on statistical learning with collected pairwise training data for the API matching and migration. Using large statistical data for refactoring is not ideal because such training data will not be available for a new library or a new version of the same library. We introduce Synthesis for Open-Source API Refactoring (SOAR), a novel technique that requires no training data to achieve API migration and refactoring. SOAR relies only on the documentation that is readily available at the release of the library to learn API representations and mapping between libraries. Using program synthesis, SOAR automatically computes the correct configuration of arguments to the APIs and any glue code required to invoke those APIs. SOAR also uses the interpreter's error messages when running refactored code to generate logical constraints that can be used to prune the search space. Our empirical evaluation shows that SOAR can successfully refactor 80% of our benchmarks corresponding to deep learning models with up to 44 layers with an average run time of 97.23 seconds, and 90% of the data wrangling benchmarks with an average run time of 17.31 seconds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access