Researcher profile

Imed BOUDABBOUS

Imed BOUDABBOUS contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Graphs whose indecomposability graph is 2-covered

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a subset $X$ of $V$ is an interval of $G$ provided that for any $a, b\in X$ and $ x\in V \setminus X$, $\{a,x\}\in E$ if and only if $\{b,x\}\in E$. For example, $\emptyset$, $\{x\}(x\in V)$ and $V$ are intervals of $G$, called trivial intervals. A graph whose intervals are trivial is indecomposable; otherwise, it is decomposable. According to Ille, the indecomposability graph of an undirected indecomposable graph $G$ is the graph $\mathbb I(G)$ whose vertices are those of $G$ and edges are the unordered pairs of distinct vertices $\{x,y\}$ such that the induced subgraph $G[V \setminus \{x,y\}]$ is indecomposable. We characterize the indecomposable graphs $G$ whose $\mathbb I(G)$ admits a vertex cover of size 2.

preprint2013arXiv

The indecomposable tournaments $T$ with $\mid W_{5}(T) \mid = \mid T \mid -2$

We consider a tournament $T=(V, A)$. For $X\subseteq V$, the subtournament of $T$ induced by $X$ is $T[X] = (X, A \cap (X \times X))$. An interval of $T$ is a subset $X$ of $V$ such that for $a, b\in X$ and $ x\in V\setminus X$, $(a,x)\in A$ if and only if $(b,x)\in A$. The trivial intervals of $T$ are $\emptyset$, $\{x\}(x\in V)$ and $V$. A tournament is indecomposable if all its intervals are trivial. For $n\geq 2$, $W_{2n+1}$ denotes the unique indecomposable tournament defined on $\{0,\dots,2n\}$ such that $W_{2n+1}[\{0,\dots,2n-1\}]$ is the usual total order. Given an indecomposable tournament $T$, $W_{5}(T)$ denotes the set of $v\in V$ such that there is $W\subseteq V$ satisfying $v\in W$ and $T[W]$ is isomorphic to $W_{5}$. Latka \cite{BJL} characterized the indecomposable tournaments $T$ such that $W_{5}(T)=\emptyset$. The authors \cite{HIK} proved that if $W_{5}(T)\neq \emptyset$, then $\mid W_{5}(T) \mid \geq \mid V \mid -2$. In this article, we characterize the indecomposable tournaments $T$ such that $\mid W_{5}(T) \mid = \mid V \mid -2$.

preprint2010arXiv

Indecomposable tournaments and their indecomposable subtournaments on 5 and 7 vertices

Given a tournament T=(V,A), a subset X of $V$ is an interval of T provided that for every a, b in X and x\in V-X, (a,x) in A if and only if (b,x) in A. For example, $\emptyset$, {x}(x in V) and V are intervals of T, called trivial intervals. A tournament, all the intervals of which are trivial, is indecomposable; otherwise, it is decomposable. A critical tournament is an indecomposable tournament T of cardinality $\geq 5$ such that for any vertex x of T, the tournament T-x is decomposable. The critical tournaments are of odd cardinality and for all $n \geq 2$ there are exactly three critical tournaments on 2n+1 vertices denoted by $T_{2n+1}$, $U_{2n+1}$ and $W_{2n+1}$. The tournaments $T_{5}$, $U_{5}$ and $W_{5}$ are the unique indecomposable tournaments on 5 vertices. We say that a tournament T embeds into a tournament T' when T is isomorphic to a subtournament of T'. A diamond is a tournament on 4 vertices admitting only one interval of cardinality 3. We prove the following theorem: if a diamond and $T_{5}$ embed into an indecomposable tournament T, then $W_{5}$ and $U_{5}$ embed into T. To conclude, we prove the following: given an indecomposable tournament T, with $\mid\!V(T)\!\mid \geq 7$, T is critical if and only if the indecomposable subtournaments on 7 vertices of T are isomorphic to one and only one of the tournaments $T_{7}$, $U_{7}$ and $W_{7}$.

preprint2010arXiv

Inversion dans les tournois

We consider the transformation reversing all arcs of a subset $X$ of the vertex set of a tournament $T$. The \emph{index} of $T$, denoted by $i(T)$, is the smallest number of subsets that must be reversed to make $T$ acyclic. It turns out that critical tournaments and $(-1)$-critical tournaments can be defined in terms of inversions (at most two for the former, at most four for the latter). We interpret $i(T)$ as the minimum distance of $T$ to the transitive tournaments on the same vertex set, and we interpret the distance between two tournaments $T$ and $T&#39;$ as the \emph{Boolean dimension} of a graph, namely the Boolean sum of $T$ and $T&#39;$. On $n$ vertices, the maximum distance is at most $n-1$, whereas $i(n)$, the maximum of $i(T)$ over the tournaments on $n$ vertices, satisfies $\frac {n-1}{2} - \log_{2}n \leq i(n) \leq n-3$, for $n \geq 4$. Let $ \mathcal{I}_{m}^{< ω}$ (resp. $\mathcal{I}_{m}^{\leq ω}$) be the class of finite (resp. at most countable) tournaments $T$ such that $i(T) \leq m$. The class $\mathcal {I}_{m}^{< ω}$ is determined by finitely many obstructions. We give a morphological description of the members of $\mathcal {I}_{1}^{< ω}$ and a description of the critical obstructions. We give an explicit description of an universal tournament of the class $\mathcal{I}_{m}^{\leq ω}$.

preprint2010arXiv

Les graphes (-1)-critiques

Given a (directed) graph G=(V,A), a subset X of V is an interval of G provided that for any a, b\in X and x\in V-X, (a,x)\in A if and only if (b,x)\in A and (x,a)\in A if and only if (x,b)\in A. For example, \emptyset, \{x\} (x \in V) and V are intervals of G, called trivial intervals. A graph, all the intervals of which are trivial, is indecomposable; otherwise, it is decomposable. A vertex x of an indecomposable graph is critical if G-x is decomposable. In 1993, J.H. Schmerl and W.T. Trotter characterized the indecomposable graphs, all the vertices of which are critical, called critical graphs. In this article, we characterize the indecomposable graphs which admit a single non critical vertex, that we call (-1)-critical graphs.} This gives an answer to a question asked by Y. Boudabbous and P. Ille in a recent article studying the critical vertices in an indecomposable graph.

preprint2010arXiv

Les tournois (-1)-critiques

Given a tournament T=(V,A), a subset X of V is an interval of T provided that for any a, b\in X and x\in V-X, (a,x) \in A if and only if (b,x)\in A. For example, \emptyset, \{x\} (x\in V) and V are intervals of T, called trivial intervals. A tournament, all the intervals of which are trivial, is indecomposable; otherwise, it is decomposable. A vertex x of an indecomposable tournament is critical if T-x is decomposable. In 1993, J.H. Schmerl and W.T. Trotter characterized the tournaments, all the vertices of which are critical, called critical tournaments. The cardinality of these tournaments is odd. Given an odd integer m \geq 5, there exist three critical tournaments of cardinality . and there are exactly three critical tournaments for each such a cardinality. In this article, we characterize the tournaments which admit a single non critical vertex, that we call (-1)-critical tournaments. The cardinality of these tournaments is odd. Given an odd integer m \geq 7, there exist 3m-15 (-1)-critical tournaments of cardinality m.