Researcher profile

Ilya Eremin

Ilya Eremin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Multi-Atom Quasiparticle Scattering Interference for Superconductor Energy-Gap Symmetry Determination

Complete theoretical understanding of the most complex superconductors requires a detailed knowledge of the symmetry of the superconducting energy-gap $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$, for all momenta $\mathbf{k}$ on the Fermi surface of every band $α$. While there are a variety of techniques for determining $|Δ_\mathbf{k}^α|$, no general method existed to measure the signed values of $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$. Recently, however, a new technique based on phase-resolved visualization of superconducting quasiparticle interference (QPI) patterns centered on a single non-magnetic impurity atom, was introduced. In principle, energy-resolved and phase-resolved Fourier analysis of these images identifies wavevectors connecting all k-space regions where $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$ has the same or opposite sign. But use of a single isolated impurity atom, from whose precise location the spatial phase of the scattering interference pattern must be measured is technically difficult. Here we introduce a generalization of this approach for use with multiple impurity atoms, and demonstrate its validity by comparing the $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$ it generates to the $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$ determined from single-atom scattering in FeSe where $s_{\pm}$ energy-gap symmetry is established. Finally, to exemplify utility, we use the multi-atom technique on LiFeAs and find scattering interference between the hole-like and electron-like pockets as predicted for $Δ_\mathbf{k}^α$ of opposite sign.

preprint2019arXiv

Pairing in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model from Weak to Strong Coupling

The Hubbard model is the simplest model that is believed to exhibit superconductivity arising from purely repulsive interactions, and has been extensively applied to explore a variety of unconventional superconducting systems. Here we study the evolution of the leading superconducting instabilities of the single-orbital Hubbard model on a two-dimensional square lattice as a function of onsite Coulomb repulsion $U$ and band filling by calculating the irreducible particle-particle scattering vertex obtained from dynamical cluster approximation (DCA) calculations, and compare the results to both perturbative Kohn-Luttinger (KL) theory as well as the widely used random phase approximation (RPA) spin-fluctuation pairing scheme. Near half-filling we find remarkable agreement of the hierarchy of the leading pairing states between these three methods, implying adiabatic continuity between weak- and strong-coupling pairing solutions of the Hubbard model. The $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave instability is robust to increasing $U$ near half-filling as expected. Away from half filling, the predictions of KL and RPA at small $U$ for transitions to other pair states agree with DCA at intermediate $U$ as well as recent diagrammatic Monte Carlo calculations. RPA results fail only in the very dilute limit, where it yields a $d_{xy}$ ground state instead of a $p$-wave state established by diagrammatic Monte Carlo and low-order perturbative methods, as well as our DCA calculations. We discuss the origins of this discrepancy, highlighting the crucial role of the vertex corrections neglected in the RPA approach. Overall, comparison of the various methods over the entire phase diagram strongly suggests a smooth crossover of the superconducting interaction generated by local Hubbard interactions between weak and strong coupling.