Source author record

Igor Konnov

Igor Konnov appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing math.OC Formal Languages and Automata Theory Logic in Computer Science Cryptography and Security econ.TH Multiagent Systems

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works

7topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Holistic Verification of Blockchain Consensus

Blockchain has recently attracted the attention of the industry due, in part, to its ability to automate asset transfers. It requires distributed participants to reach a consensus on a block despite the presence of malicious (a.k.a. Byzantine) participants. Malicious participants exploit regularly weaknesses of these blockchain consensus algorithms, with sometimes devastating consequences. In fact, these weaknesses are quite common and are well illustrated by the flaws in the hand-written proofs of existing blockchain consensus protocols [63]. Paradoxically, until now, no blockchain consensus has been holistically verified using model checking. In this paper, we remedy this paradox by model checking for the first time a blockchain consensus used in industry. We propose a holistic approach to verify the consensus algorithm of the Red Belly Blockchain [20], for any number $n$ of processes and any number $f<n/3$ of Byzantine processes. We decompose directly the algorithm pseudocode in two parts -- an inner broadcast algorithm and an outer decision algorithm -- each modelled as a threshold automaton [36], and we formalize their expected properties in linear-time temporal logic. We then automatically check the inner broadcasting algorithm, under a carefully identified fairness assumption. For the verification of the outer algorithm, we simplify the model of the inner algorithm by relying on its checked properties. Doing so, we formally verify not only the safety properties of the Red Belly Blockchain consensus but also its liveness in about 70 seconds.

preprint2022arXiv

Primal-Dual Method for Optimization Problems with Changing Constraints

We propose a modified primal-dual method for general convex optimization problems with changing constraints. We obtain properties of Lagrangian saddle points for these problems which enable us to establish convergence of the proposed method. We describe specializations of the proposed approach to multi-agent optimization problems under changing communication topology and to feasibility problems.

preprint2020arXiv

Decentralized Multi-Agent Optimization Based on a Penalty Method

We propose a decentralized penalty method for general convex constrained multi-agent optimization problems. Each auxiliary penalized problem is solved approximately with a special parallel descent splitting method. The method can be implemented in a computational network where each agent sends information only to the nearest neighbours. Convergence of the method is established under rather weak assumptions. We also describe a specialization of the proposed approach to the feasibility problem.

preprint2020arXiv

Variational Inequality Type Formulations of General Market Equilibrium Problems with Local Information

We suggest a new approach to creation of general market equilibrium models involving economic agents with local and partial knowledge about the system and under different restrictions. The market equilibrium problem is then formulated as a quasi-variational inequality that enables us to establish existence results for the model in different settings. We also describe dynamic processes, which fall into information exchange schemes of the proposed market model. In particular, we propose an iterative solution method for quasi-variational inequalities, which is based on evaluations of the proper market information only in a neighborhood of the current market state without knowledge of the whole feasible set and prove its convergence.

preprint2016arXiv

A Short Counterexample Property for Safety and Liveness Verification of Fault-tolerant Distributed Algorithms

Distributed algorithms have many mission-critical applications ranging from embedded systems and replicated databases to cloud computing. Due to asynchronous communication, process faults, or network failures, these algorithms are difficult to design and verify. Many algorithms achieve fault tolerance by using threshold guards that, for instance, ensure that a process waits until it has received an acknowledgment from a majority of its peers. Consequently, domain-specific languages for fault-tolerant distributed systems offer language support for threshold guards. We introduce an automated method for model checking of safety and liveness of threshold-guarded distributed algorithms in systems where the number of processes and the fraction of faulty processes are parameters. Our method is based on a short counterexample property: if a distributed algorithm violates a temporal specification (in a fragment of LTL), then there is a counterexample whose length is bounded and independent of the parameters. We prove this property by (i) characterizing executions depending on the structure of the temporal formula, and (ii) using commutativity of transitions to accelerate and shorten executions. We extended the ByMC toolset (Byzantine Model Checker) with our technique, and verified liveness and safety of 10 prominent fault-tolerant distributed algorithms, most of which were out of reach for existing techniques.

preprint2013arXiv

Counter Attack on Byzantine Generals: Parameterized Model Checking of Fault-tolerant Distributed Algorithms

We introduce an automated parameterized verification method for fault-tolerant distributed algorithms (FTDA). FTDAs are parameterized by both the number of processes and the assumed maximum number of Byzantine faulty processes. At the center of our technique is a parametric interval abstraction (PIA) where the interval boundaries are arithmetic expressions over parameters. Using PIA for both data abstraction and a new form of counter abstraction, we reduce the parameterized problem to finite-state model checking. We demonstrate the practical feasibility of our method by verifying several variants of the well-known distributed algorithm by Srikanth and Toueg. Our semi-decision procedures are complemented and motivated by an undecidability proof for FTDA verification which holds even in the absence of interprocess communication. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to achieve parameterized automated verification of Byzantine FTDA.

preprint2012arXiv

Starting a Dialog between Model Checking and Fault-tolerant Distributed Algorithms

Fault-tolerant distributed algorithms are central for building reliable spatially distributed systems. Unfortunately, the lack of a canonical precise framework for fault-tolerant algorithms is an obstacle for both verification and deployment. In this paper, we introduce a new domain-specific framework to capture the behavior of fault-tolerant distributed algorithms in an adequate and precise way. At the center of our framework is a parameterized system model where control flow automata are used for process specification. To account for the specific features and properties of fault-tolerant distributed algorithms for message-passing systems, our control flow automata are extended to model threshold guards as well as the inherent non-determinism stemming from asynchronous communication, interleavings of steps, and faulty processes. We demonstrate the adequacy of our framework in a representative case study where we formalize a family of well-known fault-tolerant broadcasting algorithms under a variety of failure assumptions. Our case study is supported by model checking experiments with safety and liveness specifications for a fixed number of processes. In the experiments, we systematically varied the assumptions on both the resilience condition and the failure model. In all cases, our experiments coincided with the theoretical results predicted in the distributed algorithms literature. This is giving clear evidence for the adequacy of our model. In a companion paper, we are addressing the new model checking techniques necessary for parametric verification of the distributed algorithms captured in our framework.