BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Iddo Tzameret

Iddo Tzameret contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityLogic in Computer Science

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs

We prove super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of propositional proof systems operating with constant-depth algebraic circuits over fields of zero characteristic. Specifically, we show that the subset-sum variant $\sum_{i,j,k,\ell\in[n]} z_{ijk\ell}x_ix_j x_k x_\ell - β=0$, for Boolean variables, does not have polynomial-size IPS refutations where the refutations are multilinear and written as constant-depth circuits. Andrews and Forbes (STOC'22) established recently a constant-depth IPS lower bound, but their hard instance does not have itself small constant-depth circuits, while our instance is computable already with small depth-2 circuits. Our argument relies on extending the recent breakthrough lower bounds against constant-depth algebraic circuits by Limaye, Srinivasan and Tavenas (FOCS'21) to the functional lower bound framework of Forbes, Shpilka, Tzameret and Wigderson (ToC'21), and may be of independent interest. Specifically, we construct a polynomial $f$ computable with small-size constant-depth circuits, such that the multilinear polynomial computing $1/f$ over Boolean values and its appropriate set-multilinear projection are hard for constant-depth circuits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Generating Matrix Identities and Proof Complexity

Motivated by the fundamental lower bounds questions in proof complexity, we initiate the study of matrix identities as hard instances for strong proof systems. A matrix identity of $d \times d$ matrices over a field $\mathbb{F}$, is a non-commutative polynomial $f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ over $\mathbb{F}$ such that $f$ vanishes on every $d \times d$ matrix assignment to its variables. We focus on arithmetic proofs, which are proofs of polynomial identities operating with arithmetic circuits and whose axioms are the polynomial-ring axioms (these proofs serve as an algebraic analogue of the Extended Frege propositional proof system; and over $GF(2)$ they constitute formally a sub-system of Extended Frege [HT12]). We introduce a decreasing in strength hierarchy of proof systems within arithmetic proofs, in which the $d$th level is a sound and complete proof system for proving $d \times d$ matrix identities (over a given field). For each level $d>2$ in the hierarchy, we establish a proof-size lower bound in terms of the number of variables in the matrix identity proved: we show the existence of a family of matrix identities $f_n$ with $n$ variables, such that any proof of $f_n=0$ requires $Ω(n^{2d})$ number of lines. The lower bound argument uses fundamental results from the theory of algebras with polynomial identities together with a generalization of the arguments in [Hru11]. We then set out to study matrix identities as hard instances for (full) arithmetic proofs. We present two conjectures, one about non-commutative arithmetic circuit complexity and the other about proof complexity, under which up to exponential-size lower bounds on arithmetic proofs (in terms of the arithmetic circuit size of the identities proved) hold. Finally, we discuss the applicability of our approach to strong propositional proof systems such as Extended Frege.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Sparser Random 3SAT Refutation Algorithms and the Interpolation Problem

We formalize a combinatorial principle, called the 3XOR principle, due to Feige, Kim and Ofek (2006), as a family of unsatisfiable propositional formulas for which refutations of small size in any propositional proof system that possesses the feasible interpolation property imply an efficient deterministic refutation algorithm for random 3SAT with n variables and Ω(n^{1.4}) clauses. Such small size refutations would improve the state-of-the-art (with respect to the clause density) efficient refutation algorithm, which works only for Ω(n^{1.5}) many clauses (Feige and Ofek (2007)). We demonstrate polynomial-size refutations of the 3XOR principle in resolution operating with disjunctions of quadratic equations with small integer coefficients, denoted R(quad); this is a weak extension of cutting planes with small coefficients. We show that R(quad) is weakly automatizable iff R(lin) is weakly automatizable, where R(lin) is similar to R(quad) but with linear instead of quadratic equations (introduced in Raz and Tzameret (2008)). This reduces the problem of refuting random 3CNF with n variables and Ω(n^{1.4}) clauses to the interpolation problem of R(quad) and to the weak automatizability of R(lin).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Short Proofs for the Determinant Identities

We study arithmetic proof systems P_c(F) and P_f(F) operating with arithmetic circuits and arithmetic formulas, respectively, that prove polynomial identities over a field F. We establish a series of structural theorems about these proof systems, the main one stating that P_c(F) proofs can be balanced: if a polynomial identity of syntactic degree d and depth k has a P_c(F) proof of size s, then it also has a P_c(F) proof of size poly(s,d) and depth O(k+\log^2 d + \log d\cd \log s). As a corollary, we obtain a quasipolynomial simulation of P_c(F) by P_f(F), for identities of a polynomial syntactic degree. Using these results we obtain the following: consider the identities det(XY) = det(X)det(Y) and det(Z)= z_{11}... z_{nn}, where X,Y and Z are nxn square matrices and Z is a triangular matrix with z_{11},..., z_{nn} on the diagonal (and det is the determinant polynomial). Then we can construct a polynomial-size arithmetic circuit det such that the above identities have P_c(F) proofs of polynomial-size and O(\log^2 n) depth. Moreover, there exists an arithmetic formula det of size n^{O(\log n)} such that the above identities have P_f(F) proofs of size n^{O(\log n)}. This yields a solution to a basic open problem in propositional proof complexity, namely, whether there are polynomial-size NC^2-Frege proofs for the determinant identities and the hard matrix identities, as considered, e.g., in Soltys and Cook (2004) (cf., Beame and Pitassi (1998)). We show that matrix identities like AB=I {\to} BA=I (for matrices over the two element field) as well as basic properties of the determinant have polynomial-size NC^2-Frege proofs, and quasipolynomial-size Frege proofs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas

Random 3CNF formulas constitute an important distribution for measuring the average-case behavior of propositional proof systems. Lower bounds for random 3CNF refutations in many propositional proof systems are known. Most notably are the exponential-size resolution refutation lower bounds for random 3CNF formulas with $Ω(n^{1.5-ε}) $ clauses [Chvatal and Szemeredi (1988), Ben-Sasson and Wigderson (2001)]. On the other hand, the only known non-trivial upper bound on the size of random 3CNF refutations in a non-abstract propositional proof system is for resolution with $Ω(n^{2}/\log n) $ clauses, shown by Beame et al. (2002). In this paper we show that already standard propositional proof systems, within the hierarchy of Frege proofs, admit short refutations for random 3CNF formulas, for sufficiently large clause-to-variable ratio. Specifically, we demonstrate polynomial-size propositional refutations whose lines are $TC^0$ formulas (i.e., $TC^0$-Frege proofs) for random 3CNF formulas with $ n $ variables and $ Ω(n^{1.4}) $ clauses. The idea is based on demonstrating efficient propositional correctness proofs of the random 3CNF unsatisfiability witnesses given by Feige, Kim and Ofek (2006). Since the soundness of these witnesses is verified using spectral techniques, we develop an appropriate way to reason about eigenvectors in propositional systems. To carry out the full argument we work inside weak formal systems of arithmetic and use a general translation scheme to propositional proofs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Algebraic Proofs over Noncommutative Formulas

We study possible formulations of algebraic propositional proof systems operating with noncommutative formulas. We observe that a simple formulation gives rise to systems at least as strong as Frege---yielding a semantic way to define a Cook-Reckhow (i.e., polynomially verifiable) algebraic analog of Frege proofs, different from that given in [BIKPRS96,GH03]. We then turn to an apparently weaker system, namely, polynomial calculus (PC) where polynomials are written as ordered formulas (PC over ordered formulas, for short): an ordered polynomial is a noncommutative polynomial in which the order of products in every monomial respects a fixed linear order on variables; an algebraic formula is ordered if the polynomial computed by each of its subformulas is ordered. We show that PC over ordered formulas is strictly stronger than resolution, polynomial calculus and polynomial calculus with resolution (PCR) and admits polynomial-size refutations for the pigeonhole principle and the Tseitin's formulas. We conclude by proposing an approach for establishing lower bounds on PC over ordered formulas proofs, and related systems, based on properties of lower bounds on noncommutative formulas. The motivation behind this work is developing techniques incorporating rank arguments (similar to those used in algebraic circuit complexity) for establishing lower bounds on propositional proofs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2007arXiv

Complexity of Propositional Proofs under a Promise

We study -- within the framework of propositional proof complexity -- the problem of certifying unsatisfiability of CNF formulas under the promise that any satisfiable formula has many satisfying assignments, where ``many&#39;&#39; stands for an explicitly specified function $\Lam$ in the number of variables $n$. To this end, we develop propositional proof systems under different measures of promises (that is, different $\Lam$) as extensions of resolution. This is done by augmenting resolution with axioms that, roughly, can eliminate sets of truth assignments defined by Boolean circuits. We then investigate the complexity of such systems, obtaining an exponential separation in the average-case between resolution under different size promises: 1. Resolution has polynomial-size refutations for all unsatisfiable 3CNF formulas when the promise is $\eps\cd2^n$, for any constant $0<\eps<1$. 2. There are no sub-exponential size resolution refutations for random 3CNF formulas, when the promise is $2^{δn}$ (and the number of clauses is $o(n^{3/2})$), for any constant $0<δ<1$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2007arXiv

Resolution over Linear Equations and Multilinear Proofs

We develop and study the complexity of propositional proof systems of varying strength extending resolution by allowing it to operate with disjunctions of linear equations instead of clauses. We demonstrate polynomial-size refutations for hard tautologies like the pigeonhole principle, Tseitin graph tautologies and the clique-coloring tautologies in these proof systems. Using the (monotone) interpolation by a communication game technique we establish an exponential-size lower bound on refutations in a certain, considerably strong, fragment of resolution over linear equations, as well as a general polynomial upper bound on (non-monotone) interpolants in this fragment. We then apply these results to extend and improve previous results on multilinear proofs (over fields of characteristic 0), as studied in [RazTzameret06]. Specifically, we show the following: 1. Proofs operating with depth-3 multilinear formulas polynomially simulate a certain, considerably strong, fragment of resolution over linear equations. 2. Proofs operating with depth-3 multilinear formulas admit polynomial-size refutations of the pigeonhole principle and Tseitin graph tautologies. The former improve over a previous result that established small multilinear proofs only for the \emph{functional} pigeonhole principle. The latter are different than previous proofs, and apply to multilinear proofs of Tseitin mod p graph tautologies over any field of characteristic 0. We conclude by connecting resolution over linear equations with extensions of the cutting planes proof system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access