BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Ian Stavness

Ian Stavness appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer VisionArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learningphysics.med-phTissues and Organs

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Extending the WILDS Benchmark for Unsupervised Adaptation

Machine learning systems deployed in the wild are often trained on a source distribution but deployed on a different target distribution. Unlabeled data can be a powerful point of leverage for mitigating these distribution shifts, as it is frequently much more available than labeled data and can often be obtained from distributions beyond the source distribution as well. However, existing distribution shift benchmarks with unlabeled data do not reflect the breadth of scenarios that arise in real-world applications. In this work, we present the WILDS 2.0 update, which extends 8 of the 10 datasets in the WILDS benchmark of distribution shifts to include curated unlabeled data that would be realistically obtainable in deployment. These datasets span a wide range of applications (from histology to wildlife conservation), tasks (classification, regression, and detection), and modalities (photos, satellite images, microscope slides, text, molecular graphs). The update maintains consistency with the original WILDS benchmark by using identical labeled training, validation, and test sets, as well as the evaluation metrics. On these datasets, we systematically benchmark state-of-the-art methods that leverage unlabeled data, including domain-invariant, self-training, and self-supervised methods, and show that their success on WILDS is limited. To facilitate method development and evaluation, we provide an open-source package that automates data loading and contains all of the model architectures and methods used in this paper. Code and leaderboards are available at https://wilds.stanford.edu.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

AutoCount: Unsupervised Segmentation and Counting of Organs in Field Images

Counting plant organs such as heads or tassels from outdoor imagery is a popular benchmark computer vision task in plant phenotyping, which has been previously investigated in the literature using state-of-the-art supervised deep learning techniques. However, the annotation of organs in field images is time-consuming and prone to errors. In this paper, we propose a fully unsupervised technique for counting dense objects such as plant organs. We use a convolutional network-based unsupervised segmentation method followed by two post-hoc optimization steps. The proposed technique is shown to provide competitive counting performance on a range of organ counting tasks in sorghum (S. bicolor) and wheat (T. aestivum) with no dataset-dependent tuning or modifications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Multi-Scale Weight Sharing Network for Image Recognition

In this paper, we explore the idea of weight sharing over multiple scales in convolutional networks. Inspired by traditional computer vision approaches, we share the weights of convolution kernels over different scales in the same layers of the network. Although multi-scale feature aggregation and sharing inside convolutional networks are common in practice, none of the previous works address the issue of convolutional weight sharing. We evaluate our weight sharing scheme on two heterogeneous image recognition datasets - ImageNet (object recognition) and Places365-Standard (scene classification). With approximately 25% fewer parameters, our shared-weight ResNet model provides similar performance compared to baseline ResNets. Shared-weight models are further validated via transfer learning experiments on four additional image recognition datasets - Caltech256 and Stanford 40 Actions (object-centric) and SUN397 and MIT Inddor67 (scene-centric). Experimental results demonstrate significant redundancy in the vanilla implementations of the deeper networks, and also indicate that a shift towards increasing the receptive field per parameter may improve future convolutional network architectures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation For Plant Organ Counting

Supervised learning is often used to count objects in images, but for counting small, densely located objects, the required image annotations are burdensome to collect. Counting plant organs for image-based plant phenotyping falls within this category. Object counting in plant images is further challenged by having plant image datasets with significant domain shift due to different experimental conditions, e.g. applying an annotated dataset of indoor plant images for use on outdoor images, or on a different plant species. In this paper, we propose a domain-adversarial learning approach for domain adaptation of density map estimation for the purposes of object counting. The approach does not assume perfectly aligned distributions between the source and target datasets, which makes it more broadly applicable within general object counting and plant organ counting tasks. Evaluation on two diverse object counting tasks (wheat spikelets, leaves) demonstrates consistent performance on the target datasets across different classes of domain shift: from indoor-to-outdoor images and from species-to-species adaptation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A biomechanical modeling study of the effects of the orbicularis oris muscle and jaw posture on lip shape

Purpose: The authors' general aim is to use biomechanical models of speech articulators to explore how possible variations in anatomical structure contribute to differences in articulatory strategies and phone systems across human populations. Specifically, they investigated 2 issues: (a) the link between lip muscle anatomy and variability in lip gestures and (b) the constraints of coupled lip/jaw biomechanics on jaw posture in labial sounds. Method: The authors used a model coupling the jaw, tongue, and face. First, the influence of the orbicularis oris (OO) anatomical implementation was analyzed by assessing how changes in depth (from epidermis to the skull) and peripheralness (proximity to the lip horn center) affected lip shaping. Second, the capability of the lip/jaw system to generate protrusion and rounding, or labial closure, was evaluated for different jaw heights. Results: Results showed that a peripheral and moderately deep OO implementation is most appropriate for protrusion and rounding; a superficial implementation facilitates closure; protrusion and rounding require a high jaw position; and closure is achievable for various jaw heights. Conclusions: Models provide objective information regarding possible links between anatomical and speech production variability across humans. Comparisons with experimental data will illustrate how motor control and cultural factors cope with these constraints.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access