Researcher profile

Hyeongjun Yun

Hyeongjun Yun contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Don't Let Bandit Feedback Pull Continual LLM-Recommender Updates Off Target

Generative LLM-based recommenders (LLM-Rec) require continual post-deployment updates, yet deployment logs provide only policy-shaped contextual bandit feedback: outcomes are observed solely for items exposed by a prior serving policy, inducing exposure bias and yielding partial, asymmetric signals consisting of relatively reliable positive responses and ambiguous no-responses. We propose an Anchored Bandit Policy Optimization (ABPO) framework for continual LLM-Rec updates that combines group-relative policy optimization (GRPO) with explicit treatment of exposure bias and feedback ambiguity. Specifically, we insert the exposed recommendation as a logged anchor into each GRPO rollout group, so that group-relative normalization is calibrated against the action actually exposed by the prior policy rather than against newly sampled rollouts alone. Because both positive- and no-responses are observed only through prior-policy exposure, we apply self-normalized inverse propensity scoring to the fixed anchor for both feedback types to correct for policy mismatch. At the same time, we treat the two feedback types asymmetrically in reliability: positive responses provide relatively direct endorsement signals, whereas no-responses remain ambiguous because they may reflect either true disinterest or unobserved external factors. To avoid overly aggressive updates from ambiguous no-responses, we temper their penalties with self-certainty, using the model's output-token confidence as a verifier-free reliability signal. Across five domains from Amazon Reviews and MovieLens, our method yields consistent post-update gains in recommendation accuracy while mitigating prior-policy-induced exposure bias more effectively than prior baselines.

preprint2025arXiv

Towards Trustworthy LLM-Based Recommendation via Rationale Integration

Traditional recommender systems (RS) have been primarily optimized for accuracy and short-term engagement, often overlooking transparency and trustworthiness. Recently, platforms such as Amazon and Instagram have begun providing recommendation rationales to users, acknowledging their critical role in fostering trust and enhancing engagement; however, most existing systems still treat them as post-hoc artifacts. We propose an LLM-based recommender (LLM-Rec) that not only predicts items but also generates logically grounded rationales. Our approach leverages a self-annotated rationale dataset and instruction tuning in a rationale-first format, where the model generates an explanation before outputting the recommended item. By adopting this strategy and representing rationales in a chain-of-thought (CoT) style, LLM-Rec strengthens both interpretability and recommendation performance. Experiments on the Fashion and Scientific domains of the Amazon Review dataset demonstrate significant improvements over well-established baselines. To encourage reproducibility and future research, we publicly release a rationale-augmented recommendation dataset containing user histories, rationales, and recommended items.