BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Hui-Hai Liu

Hui-Hai Liu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.geo-phphysics.flu-dyn

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Numerical Simulations of Geomechanical Deformation, Fluid Flow and Reactive Transport in Shale Rough-Walled Microfractures

Improving hydrocarbon production with hydraulic fracturing from unconventional reservoirs requires investigating transport phenomena at the single fracture level. In this study, we simulated geomechanical deformation, fluid flow, and reactive transport to understand the effect of hydraulic fracturing treatment on permeability evolution in shale rough-walled fractures. Using concepts of fractional Brownian motion and surface roughness characterizations with laser profilometer, we first generated three rough-walled microfractures consistent with three laboratory experiments (i.e., E4, E5 and E6). After that, the generated microfractures were subjected to a confining pressure in accord with experimental conditions, and geomechanical deformation was simulated. We used the OpenFOAM software package to simulate the fluid flow and permeability. By comparing the simulated permeability values with the experimentally measured ones we found relative errors equal to 28, 15 and 200% respectively for the experiments E4, E5 and E6. After calibration, however, the relative error dropped below 4%. We next simulated the reactive transport using the GeoChemFOAM solver and investigated permeability evolution in the deformed microfractures. We found that after 10 hrs of reactive transport simulations, permeability increased by 47%, on average, in all cases studied here.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Scale-dependent permeability and formation factor in porous media: Applications from percolation theory

Understanding porous media properties and their scale dependence have been an active subject of research in the past several decades in hydrology, geosciences and petroleum engineering. The scale dependence of flow in porous media is attributed to small- and large-scale heterogeneities, such as pore size distribution, pore connectivity, long-range correlations, fractures and faults orientations, and spatial and temporal variations. The main objective of this study was to investigate how permeability (k) and formation factor (F) vary with sample dimension at small scales by means of a combination of pore-network modeling and percolation theory. For this purpose, the permeability and formation factor were simulated in twelve three-dimensional pore networks with different levels of pore-scale heterogeneities. Simulations were carried out at five different network sizes, i.e., 1130, 2250, 3380, 4510 and 6770 microns. Four theoretical models were also developed based on percolation theory to estimate the scale dependence of permeability and formation factor from the pore-throat radius distribution. In addition, two other theoretical scale-dependent permeability models were proposed to estimate permeability at different scales from the pore-throat radius distribution and formation factor. Comparing theoretical estimations with numerical simulations showed that the proposed models estimate the scale dependence of permeability and formation factor reasonably. The calculated relative error (RE) ranged between -3.7 and 3.8% for the permeability and between 0.21 and 4.04% for the formation factor in the studied pore-networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Gas relative permeability in unconventional reservoir rocks

Accurate modeling of gas relative permeability has practical applications in oil and gas exploration, production and recovery of unconventional reservoirs. In this study, we apply concepts from the effective-medium approximation (EMA) and universal power-law scaling from percolation theory. Although the EMA has been successfully used to estimate relative permeability in conventional porous media, to the best of our knowledge, its applications to unconventional reservoir rocks have not been addressed yet. The main objective of this study, therefore, is to evaluate the efficiency of EMA, in combination with universal power-law scaling from percolation theory, in estimating gas relative permeability from pore size distribution and pore connectivity. We presume that gas flow is mainly controlled by two main mechanisms contributing in parallel (1) hydraulic flow and (2) molecular flow. We then apply the EMA to determine effective conductances and, consequently, gas relative permeability at higher gas saturations, and the universal scaling from percolation theory at lower gas saturation values. Comparisons with two pore-network simulations and six experimental measurements from the literature show that, in the absence of microfractures, the proposed model estimates gas relative permeability reasonably well in shales and tight porous rocks. More specifically, we found that the crossover point, gas saturation at which transport crosses from percolation theory to the EMA, is non-universal. The value of crossover gas saturation is a function of pore space characteristics such as pore size distribution broadness and critical gas saturation. This means that one should expect the crossover gas saturation to vary from one rock sample to another.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access