Source author record

Huang Lin

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

cs.CY math.RT

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2022arXiv

On the center conjecture for the cyclotomic KLR algebras

The center conjecture for the cyclotomic KLR algebras $R_β^Λ$ asserts that the center of $R_β^Λ$ consists of symmetric elements in its KLR $x$ and $e(ν)$ generators. In this paper we show that this conjecture is equivalent to the injectivity of some natural map $\barι_β^{Λ,i}$ from the cocenter of $R_β^Λ$ to the cocenter of $R_β^{Λ+Λ_i}$ for all $i\in I$ and $Λ\in P^+$ . We prove that the map $\barι_β^{Λ,i}$ is given by multiplication with a center element $z(i,β)\in R_β^{Λ+Λ_i}$ and we explicitly calculate the element $z(i,β)$ in terms of the KLR $x$ and $e(ν)$ generators. We present an explicit monomial basis for certain bi-weight spaces of the defining ideal of $R_β^Λ$ and of $R_β^Λ$ . For $β=\sum_{j=1}^nα_{i_j}$ with $α_{i_1},\cdots, α_{i_n}$ pairwise distinct, we construct an explicit monomial basis of $R_β^Λ$ , prove the map $\barι_β^{Λ,i}$ is injective and thus verify the center conjecture for these $R_β^Λ$ .

preprint2016arXiv

FairTest: Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications

In a world where traditional notions of privacy are increasingly challenged by the myriad companies that collect and analyze our data, it is important that decision-making entities are held accountable for unfair treatments arising from irresponsible data usage. Unfortunately, a lack of appropriate methodologies and tools means that even identifying unfair or discriminatory effects can be a challenge in practice. We introduce the unwarranted associations (UA) framework, a principled methodology for the discovery of unfair, discriminatory, or offensive user treatment in data-driven applications. The UA framework unifies and rationalizes a number of prior attempts at formalizing algorithmic fairness. It uniquely combines multiple investigative primitives and fairness metrics with broad applicability, granular exploration of unfair treatment in user subgroups, and incorporation of natural notions of utility that may account for observed disparities. We instantiate the UA framework in FairTest, the first comprehensive tool that helps developers check data-driven applications for unfair user treatment. It enables scalable and statistically rigorous investigation of associations between application outcomes (such as prices or premiums) and sensitive user attributes (such as race or gender). Furthermore, FairTest provides debugging capabilities that let programmers rule out potential confounders for observed unfair effects. We report on use of FairTest to investigate and in some cases address disparate impact, offensive labeling, and uneven rates of algorithmic error in four data-driven applications. As examples, our results reveal subtle biases against older populations in the distribution of error in a predictive health application and offensive racial labeling in an image tagger.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.