BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Hitesh Tulsiani

Hitesh Tulsiani contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computation and Languageeess.ASMachine LearningSound

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Task Oriented Dialogue as a Catalyst for Self-Supervised Automatic Speech Recognition

While word error rates of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems have consistently fallen, natural language understanding (NLU) applications built on top of ASR systems still attribute significant numbers of failures to low-quality speech recognition results. Existing assistant systems collect large numbers of these unsuccessful interactions, but these systems usually fail to learn from these interactions, even in an offline fashion. In this work, we introduce CLC: Contrastive Learning for Conversations, a family of methods for contrastive fine-tuning of models in a self-supervised fashion, making use of easily detectable artifacts in unsuccessful conversations with assistants. We demonstrate that our CLC family of approaches can improve the performance of ASR models on OD3, a new public large-scale semi-synthetic meta-dataset of audio task-oriented dialogues, by up to 19.2%. These gains transfer to real-world systems as well, where we show that CLC can help to improve performance by up to 6.7% over baselines. We make OD3 publicly available at https://github.com/amazon-science/amazon-od3 .

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Knowledge Distillation and Data Selection for Semi-Supervised Learning in CTC Acoustic Models

Semi-supervised learning (SSL) is an active area of research which aims to utilize unlabelled data in order to improve the accuracy of speech recognition systems. The current study proposes a methodology for integration of two key ideas: 1) SSL using connectionist temporal classification (CTC) objective and teacher-student based learning 2) Designing effective data-selection mechanisms for leveraging unlabelled data to boost performance of student models. Our aim is to establish the importance of good criteria in selecting samples from a large pool of unlabelled data based on attributes like confidence measure, speaker and content variability. The question we try to answer is: Is it possible to design a data selection mechanism which reduces dependence on a large set of randomly selected unlabelled samples without compromising on Word Error Rate (WER)? We perform empirical investigations of different data selection methods to answer this question and quantify the effect of different sampling strategies. On a semi-supervised ASR setting with 40000 hours of carefully selected unlabelled data, our CTC-SSL approach gives 17% relative WER improvement over a baseline CTC system trained with labelled data. It also achieves on-par performance with CTC-SSL system trained on order of magnitude larger unlabeled data based on random sampling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access