BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Henning Fernau

Henning Fernau contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityData Structures and AlgorithmsComputational GeometryFormal Languages and Automata Theorymath.COComputation and LanguageDiscrete MathematicsRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Sum Labelling Graphs of Maximum Degree Two

The concept of sum labelling was introduced in 1990 by Harary. A graph is a sum graph if its vertices can be labelled by distinct positive integers in such a way that two vertices are connected by an edge if and only if the sum of their labels is the label of another vertex in the graph. It is easy to see that every sum graph has at least one isolated vertex, and every graph can be made a sum graph by adding at most $n^2$ isolated vertices to it. The minimum number of isolated vertices that need to be added to a graph to make it a sum graph is called the sum number of the graph. The sum number of several prominent graph classes (e.g., cycles, trees, complete graphs) is already well known. We examine the effect of taking the disjoint union of graphs on the sum number. In particular, we provide a complete characterization of the sum number of graphs of maximum degree two, since every such graph is the disjoint union of paths and cycles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

All Paths Lead to Rome

All roads lead to Rome is the core idea of the puzzle game Roma. It is played on an $n \times n$ grid consisting of quadratic cells. Those cells are grouped into boxes of at most four neighboring cells and are either filled, or to be filled, with arrows pointing in cardinal directions. The goal of the game is to fill the empty cells with arrows such that each box contains at most one arrow of each direction and regardless where we start, if we follow the arrows in the cells, we will always end up in the special Roma-cell. In this work, we study the computational complexity of the puzzle game Roma and show that completing a Roma board according to the rules is an \NP-complete task, counting the number of valid completions is #Ptime-complete, and determining the number of preset arrows needed to make the instance \emph{uniquely} solvable is $Σ_2^P$-complete. We further show that the problem of completing a given Roma instance on an $n\times n$ board cannot be solved in time $\mathcal{O}\left(2^{{o}(n)}\right)$ under ETH and give a matching dynamic programming algorithm based on the idea of Catalan structures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Minimal Roman Dominating Functions: Extensions and Enumeration

Roman domination is one of the many variants of domination that keeps most of the complexity features of the classical domination problem. We prove that Roman domination behaves differently in two aspects: enumeration and extension. We develop non-trivial enumeration algorithms for minimal Roman domination functions with polynomial delay and polynomial space. Recall that the existence of a similar enumeration result for minimal dominating sets is open for decades. Our result is based on a polynomial-time algorithm for Extension Roman Domination: Given a graph $G = (V,E)$ and a function $f:V\to\{0,1,2\}$, is there a minimal Roman domination function $\Tilde{f}$ with $f\leq \Tilde{f}$? Here, $\leq$ lifts $0< 1< 2$ pointwise; minimality is understood in this order. Our enumeration algorithm is also analyzed from an input-sensitive viewpoint, leading to a run-time estimate of $\Oh(\RomanUpperbound^n)$ for graphs of order n; this is complemented by a lower bound example of $Ω(\RomanLowerbound^n)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Recognizing well-dominated graphs is coNP-complete

A graph $G$ is well-covered if every minimal vertex cover of $G$ is minimum, and a graph $G$ is well-dominated if every minimal dominating set of $G$ is minimum. Studies on well-covered graphs were initiated in [Plummer, JCT 1970], and well-dominated graphs were first introduced in [Finbow, Hartnell and Nowakow, AC 1988]. Well-dominated graphs are well-covered, and both classes have been widely studied in the literature. The recognition of well-covered graphs was proved coNP-complete by [Chvátal and Slater, AODM 1993] and by [Sankaranarayana and Stewart, Networks 1992], but the complexity of recognizing well-dominated graphs has been left open since their introduction. We close this complexity gap by proving that recognizing well-dominated graphs is coNP-complete. This solves a well-known open question (c.f. [Levit and Tankus, DM 2017] and [Gözüpek, Hujdurovic and Milanič, DMTCS 2017]), which was first asked in [Caro, Sebő and Tarsi, JAlg 1996]. Surprisingly, our proof is quite simple, although it was a long-standing open problem. Finally, we show that recognizing well-totally-dominated graphs is coNP-complete, answering a question of [Bahad\ir, Ekim, and Gözüpek, AMC 2021].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Roman Census: Enumerating and Counting Roman Dominating Functions on Graph Classes

The concept of Roman domination has recently been studied concerning enumerating and counting (WG 2022). It has been shown that minimal Roman dominating functions can be enumerated with polynomial delay, contrasting what is known about minimal dominating sets. The running time of the algorithm could be estimated as $\mathcal{O}(1.9332^n)$ on general graphs of order $n$. In this paper, we focus on special graph classes. More specifically, for chordal graphs, we present an enumeration algorithm running in time $\mathcal{O}(1.8940^n)$. For interval graphs, we can lower this time further to $\mathcal{O}(1.7321^n)$. Interestingly, this also matches (exactly) the known lower bound. We can also provide a matching lower and upper bound for forests, which is (incidentally) the same, namely $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{3}^n)$. Furthermore, we show an enumeration algorithm running in time $\mathcal{O}(1.4656^n)$ for split graphs and for cobipartite graphs. Our approach also allows to give concrete formulas for counting minimal Roman dominating functions on special graph families like paths.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Space Complexity of Sum Labelling

A graph is called a sum graph if its vertices can be labelled by distinct positive integers such that there is an edge between two vertices if and only if the sum of their labels is the label of another vertex of the graph. Most papers on sum graphs consider combinatorial questions like the minimum number of isolated vertices that need to be added to a given graph to make it a sum graph. In this paper, we initiate the study of sum graphs from the viewpoint of computational complexity. Notice that every $n$-vertex sum graph can be represented by a sorted list of $n$ positive integers where edge queries can be answered in $O(\log n)$ time. Therefore, limiting the size of the vertex labels also upper-bounds the space complexity of storing the graph in the database. We show that every $n$-vertex, $m$-edge, $d$-degenerate graph can be made a sum graph by adding at most $m$ isolated vertices to it, such that the size of each vertex label is at most $O(n^2d)$. This enables us to store the graph using $O(m\log n)$ bits of memory. For sparse graphs (graphs with $O(n)$ edges), this matches the trivial lower bound of $Ω(n\log n)$. Since planar graphs and forests have constant degeneracy, our result implies an upper bound of $O(n^2)$ on their label size. The previously best known upper bound on the label size of general graphs with the minimum number of isolated vertices was $O(4^n)$, due to Kratochvíl, Miller & Nguyen. Furthermore, their proof was existential, whereas our labelling can be constructed in polynomial time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Unlabeled Multi-Robot Motion Planning with Tighter Separation Bounds

We consider the unlabeled motion-planning problem of $m$ unit-disc robots moving in a simple polygonal workspace of $n$ edges. The goal is to find a motion plan that moves the robots to a given set of $m$ target positions. For the unlabeled variant, it does not matter which robot reaches which target position as long as all target positions are occupied in the end. If the workspace has narrow passages such that the robots cannot fit through them, then the free configuration space, representing all possible unobstructed positions of the robots, will consist of multiple connected components. Even if in each component of the free space the number of targets matches the number of start positions, the motion-planning problem does not always have a solution when the robots and their targets are positioned very densely. In this paper, we prove tight bounds on how much separation between start and target positions is necessary to always guarantee a solution. Moreover, we describe an algorithm that always finds a solution in time $O(n \log n + mn + m^2)$ if the separation bounds are met. Specifically, we prove that the following separation is sufficient: any two start positions are at least distance $4$ apart, any two target positions are at least distance $4$ apart, and any pair of a start and a target positions is at least distance $3$ apart. We further show that when the free space consists of a single connected component, the separation between start and target positions is not necessary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Regular Intersection Emptiness of Graph Problems: Finding a Needle in a Haystack of Graphs with the Help of Automata

The Int_reg-problem of a combinatorial problem P asks, given a nondeterministic automaton M as input, whether the language L(M) accepted by M contains any positive instance of the problem P. We consider the Int_reg-problem for a number of different graph problems and give general criteria that give decision procedures for these Int_reg-problems. To achieve this goal, we consider a natural graph encoding so that the language of all graph encodings is regular. Then, we draw the connection between classical pumping- and interchange-arguments from the field of formal language theory with the graph operations induced on the encoded graph. Our techniques apply among others to the Int_reg-problem of well-known graph problems like Vertex Cover and Independent Set, as well as to subgraph problems, graph-edit problems and graph-partitioning problems, including coloring problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Synchronization of Deterministic Visibly Push-Down Automata

We generalize the concept of synchronizing words for finite automata, which map all states of the automata to the same state, to deterministic visibly push-down automata. Here, a synchronizing word w does not only map all states to the same state but also fulfills some conditions on the stack content of each run after reading w. We consider three types of these stack constraints: after reading w, the stack (1) is empty in each run, (2) contains the same sequence of stack symbols in each run, or (3) contains an arbitrary sequence which is independent of the other runs. We show that in contrast to general deterministic push-down automata, it is decidable for deterministic visibly push-down automata whether there exists a synchronizing word with each of these stack constraints, i.e., the problems are in EXPTIME. Under the constraint (1) the problem is even in P. For the sub-classes of deterministic very visibly push-down automata the problem is in P for all three types of constraints. We further study variants of the synchronization problem where the number of turns in the stack height behavior caused by a synchronizing word is restricted, as well as the problem of synchronizing a variant of a sequential transducer, which shows some visibly behavior, by a word that synchronizes the states and produces the same output on all runs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access