Researcher profile

Harald Øverby

Harald Øverby contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2017arXiv

Balanced Locally Repairable Codes

We introduce a family of balanced locally repairable codes (BLRCs) $[n, k, d]$ for arbitrary values of $n$, $k$ and $d$. Similar to other locally repairable codes (LRCs), the presented codes are suitable for applications that require a low repair locality. The novelty that we introduce in our construction is that we relax the strict requirement the repair locality to be a fixed small number $l$, and we allow the repair locality to be either $l$ or $l+1$. This gives us the flexibility to construct BLRCs for arbitrary values of $n$ and $k$ which partially solves the open problem of finding a general construction of LRCs. Additionally, the relaxed locality criteria gives us an opportunity to search for BLRCs that have a low repair locality even when double failures occur. We use metrics such as a storage overhead, an average repair bandwidth, a Mean Time To Data Loss (MTTDL) and an update complexity to compare the performance of BLRCs with existing LRCs.

preprint2017arXiv

HashTag Erasure Codes: From Theory to Practice

Minimum-Storage Regenerating (MSR) codes have emerged as a viable alternative to Reed-Solomon (RS) codes as they minimize the repair bandwidth while they are still optimal in terms of reliability and storage overhead. Although several MSR constructions exist, so far they have not been practically implemented mainly due to the big number of I/O operations. In this paper, we analyze high-rate MDS codes that are simultaneously optimized in terms of storage, reliability, I/O operations, and repair-bandwidth for single and multiple failures of the systematic nodes. The codes were recently introduced in \cite{7463553} without any specific name. Due to the resemblance between the hashtag sign \# and the procedure of the code construction, we call them in this paper \emph{HashTag Erasure Codes (HTECs)}. HTECs provide the lowest data-read and data-transfer, and thus the lowest repair time for an arbitrary sub-packetization level $α$, where $α\leq r^{\lceil \sfrac{k}{r} \rceil}$, among all existing MDS codes for distributed storage including MSR codes. The repair process is linear and highly parallel. Additionally, we show that HTECs are the first high-rate MDS codes that reduce the repair bandwidth for more than one failure. Practical implementations of HTECs in Hadoop release 3.0.0-alpha2 demonstrate their great potentials.

preprint2016arXiv

General Sub-packetized Access-Optimal Regenerating Codes

This paper presents a novel construction of $(n,k,d=n-1)$ access-optimal regenerating codes for an arbitrary sub-packetization level $α$ for exact repair of any systematic node. We refer to these codes as general sub-packetized because we provide an algorithm for constructing codes for any $α$ less than or equal to $r^{\lceil \frac{k}{r} \rceil}$ where $\frac{k}{r}$ is not necessarily an integer. This leads to a flexible construction of codes for different code rates compared to existing approaches. We derive the lower and the upper bound of the repair bandwidth. The repair bandwidth depends on the code parameters and $α$. The repair process of a failed systematic node is linear and highly parallelized, which means that a set of $\lceil \fracα{r} \rceil$ symbols is independently repaired first and used along with the accessed data from other nodes to recover the remaining symbols.