Researcher profile

Haojie Guo

Haojie Guo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Observation of superconducting collective modes from competing pairing instabilities in single-layer NbSe$_2$

In certain unconventional superconductors with sizable electronic correlations, the availability of closely competing pairing channels leads to characteristic soft collective fluctuations of the order parameters, which leave fingerprints in many observables and allow to scrutinize the phase competition. Superconducting layered materials, where electron-electron interactions are enhanced with decreasing thickness, are promising candidates to display these correlation effects. In this work, we report the existence of a soft collective mode in single-layer NbSe$_2$, observed as a characteristic resonance excitation in high resolution tunneling spectra. This resonance is observed along with higher harmonics, its frequency $Ω/2Δ$ is anticorrelated with the local superconducting gap $Δ$, and its amplitude gradually vanishes by increasing the temperature and upon applying a magnetic field up to the critical values (T$_C$ and H$_{C2}$), which sets an unambiguous link to the superconducting state. Aided by a microscopic model that captures the main experimental observations, we interpret this resonance as a collective Leggett mode that represents the fluctuation towards a proximate f-wave triplet state, due to subleading attraction in the triplet channel. Our findings demonstrate the fundamental role of correlations in superconducting 2D transition metal dichalcogenides, opening a path towards unconventional superconductivity in simple, scalable and transferable 2D superconductors.

preprint2020arXiv

Tips and Tricks for Webly-Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition: Learning from the WebFG 2020 Challenge

WebFG 2020 is an international challenge hosted by Nanjing University of Science and Technology, University of Edinburgh, Nanjing University, The University of Adelaide, Waseda University, etc. This challenge mainly pays attention to the webly-supervised fine-grained recognition problem. In the literature, existing deep learning methods highly rely on large-scale and high-quality labeled training data, which poses a limitation to their practicability and scalability in real world applications. In particular, for fine-grained recognition, a visual task that requires professional knowledge for labeling, the cost of acquiring labeled training data is quite high. It causes extreme difficulties to obtain a large amount of high-quality training data. Therefore, utilizing free web data to train fine-grained recognition models has attracted increasing attentions from researchers in the fine-grained community. This challenge expects participants to develop webly-supervised fine-grained recognition methods, which leverages web images in training fine-grained recognition models to ease the extreme dependence of deep learning methods on large-scale manually labeled datasets and to enhance their practicability and scalability. In this technical report, we have pulled together the top WebFG 2020 solutions of total 54 competing teams, and discuss what methods worked best across the set of winning teams, and what surprisingly did not help.