Source author record

Hanfeng Zhai

Hanfeng Zhai appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Biological Physics Machine Learning math.DS nlin.AO physics.flu-dyn

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

5topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Comparison of Deep Learning and Deterministic Algorithms for Control Modeling

Controlling nonlinear dynamics arise in various engineering fields. We present efforts to model the forced van der Pol system control using physics-informed neural networks (PINN) compared to benchmark methods, including idealized nonlinear feedforward (FF) control, linearized feedback control (FB), and feedforward-plus-feedback combined (C). The aim is to implement circular trajectories in the state space of the van der Pol system. A designed benchmark problem is used for testing the behavioral differences of the disparate controllers and then investigating controlled schemes and systems of various extents of nonlinearities. All methods exhibit a short initialization accompanying arbitrary initialization points. FF control successfully converges to the desired trajectory, and PINN executes good controls with higher stochasticity observed for higher-order terms based on the phase portraits. In contrast, combined control failed. Varying trajectory amplitudes revealed that FF, FB, and combined control all fail for unity nonlinear damping gain. Traditional control methods display a robust fluctuation for higher-order terms. For some various nonlinearities, PINN failed to implement the desired trajectory instead of becoming "trapped" in the phase of a small radius, yet FB successfully implemented controls. PINN generally exhibits lower relative errors for varying targeted trajectories. However, PINN also shows evidently higher computational burden compared with traditional control theory methods, with at least more than 30 times longer control time compared with benchmark idealized nonlinear feed-forward control. This manuscript proposes a comprehensive comparative study for future controller employment considering deterministic and machine learning approaches.

preprint2022arXiv

Multiscale Computational Modeling of Biofilm

We review the computation models for biofilm and bacteria cells, providing perspectives on biofilm's various properties and potential serving as engineering living materials (ELMs), considering the omnipresence of such biological matter. The minireview starts from the molecular regime, bottom-up to the mesoscale, to continuum, with an emphasis on the mesoscale algorithms such as dissipative particles dynamics (DPD) and individual-based modeling (IbM). Some representative works are highlighted considering different modeling methods on each scale. The advantages and limitations of each algorithm for different scales are elaborated given the existed research works. Specifically, the potential for IbM, also known as the discrete element method (DEM) is targeted for its accurate description of both biological and mechanical properties.

preprint2021arXiv

BubbleNet: Inferring micro-bubble dynamics with semi-physics-informed deep learning

Micro-bubbles and bubbly flows are widely observed and applied in chemical engineering, medicine, involves deformation, rupture, and collision of bubbles, phase mixture, etc. We study bubble dynamics by setting up two numerical simulation cases: bubbly flow with a single bubble and multiple bubbles, both confined in the microchannel, with parameters corresponding to their medical backgrounds. Both the cases have their medical background applications. Multiphase flow simulation requires high computation accuracy due to possible component losses that may be caused by sparse meshing during the computation. Hence, data-driven methods can be adopted as an useful tool. Based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), we propose a novel deep learning framework BubbleNet, which entails three main parts: deep neural networks (DNN) with sub nets for predicting different physics fields; the semi-physics-informed part, with only the fluid continuum condition and the pressure Poisson equation $\mathcal{P}$ encoded within; the time discretized normalizer (TDN), an algorithm to normalize field data per time step before training. We apply the traditional DNN and our BubbleNet to train the coarsened simulation data and predict the physics fields of both the two bubbly flow cases. The BubbleNets are trained for both with and without $\mathcal{P}$, from which we conclude that the 'physics-informed' part can serve as inner supervision. Results indicate our framework can predict the physics fields more accurately, estimating the prediction absolute errors. Our deep learning predictions outperform traditional numerical methods computed with similar data density meshing. The proposed network can potentially be applied to many other engineering fields.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint