Researcher profile

Guozheng Ma

Guozheng Ma contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

STRIDE: Learnable Stepwise Language Feedback for LLM Reasoning

Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning (RL) have underscored its potential for incentivizing reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing step-level efforts suffer from costly annotations that limit domain coverage, while scalar scores further impose an information bottleneck, offering insufficient semantic bandwidth to improve intermediate decisions. Alternative language-critique approaches, which rely on frozen or external critics, provide richer textual feedback but lack the scalability needed for sustained policy improvement. In this work, we propose language-driven stepwise trajectory redirection, termed as STRIDE, a novel training framework that shifts process supervision from scalar rewards to learnable stepwise language feedback. Specifically, we co-train a generator and a generative verifier using only outcome-based rewards, eliminating external annotations, while delivering sustained policy improvement through jointly aligned verifier training. The verifier's stepwise language critiques explicitly localize and explain failures, enabling the generator to redirect reasoning trajectories at intermediate steps toward alternative decisions. The trajectory redirection design guarantees harmless policy improvement, even under noisy or suboptimal verifier feedback. Experiments on diverse reasoning benchmarks show that STRIDE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, as well as achieving breakthroughs on zero-pass-rate problems where scalar methods yield no learning signal in our ablation studies, demonstrating the effectiveness of learnable stepwise language feedback for enhancing LLM reasoning.

preprint2022arXiv

Don't Touch What Matters: Task-Aware Lipschitz Data Augmentation for Visual Reinforcement Learning

One of the key challenges in visual Reinforcement Learning (RL) is to learn policies that can generalize to unseen environments. Recently, data augmentation techniques aiming at enhancing data diversity have demonstrated proven performance in improving the generalization ability of learned policies. However, due to the sensitivity of RL training, naively applying data augmentation, which transforms each pixel in a task-agnostic manner, may suffer from instability and damage the sample efficiency, thus further exacerbating the generalization performance. At the heart of this phenomenon is the diverged action distribution and high-variance value estimation in the face of augmented images. To alleviate this issue, we propose Task-aware Lipschitz Data Augmentation (TLDA) for visual RL, which explicitly identifies the task-correlated pixels with large Lipschitz constants, and only augments the task-irrelevant pixels. To verify the effectiveness of TLDA, we conduct extensive experiments on DeepMind Control suite, CARLA and DeepMind Manipulation tasks, showing that TLDA improves both sample efficiency in training time and generalization in test time. It outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods across the 3 different visual control benchmarks.