BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Guohui Lin

Guohui Lin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational GeometryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

An efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme for parallel multi-stage open shops

Various new scheduling problems have been arising from practical production processes and spawning new research areas in the scheduling field. We study the parallel multi-stage open shops problem, which generalizes the classic open shop scheduling and parallel machine scheduling problems. Given m identical k-stage open shops and a set of n jobs, we aim to process all jobs on these open shops with the minimum makespan, i.e., the completion time of the last job, under the constraint that job preemption is not allowed. We present an efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS) for the case when both m and k are constant. The main idea for our EPTAS is the combination of several categorization, scaling, and linear programming rounding techniques. Jobs and/or operations are first scaled and then categorized carefully into multiple types so that different types of jobs and/or operations are scheduled appropriately without increasing the makespan too much.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Approximation algorithms for covering vertices by long paths

Given a graph, the general problem to cover the maximum number of vertices by a collection of vertex-disjoint long paths seemingly escapes from the literature. A path containing at least $k$ vertices is considered long. When $k \le 3$, the problem is polynomial time solvable; when $k$ is the total number of vertices, the problem reduces to the Hamiltonian path problem, which is NP-complete. For a fixed $k \ge 4$, the problem is NP-hard and the best known approximation algorithm for the weighted set packing problem implies a $k$-approximation algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, there is no approximation algorithm directly designed for the general problem; when $k = 4$, the problem admits a $4$-approximation algorithm which was presented recently. We propose the first $(0.4394 k + O(1))$-approximation algorithm for the general problem and an improved $2$-approximation algorithm when $k = 4$. Both algorithms are based on local improvement, and their theoretical performance analyses are done via amortization and their practical performance is examined through simulation studies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Acyclic edge coloring conjecture is true on planar graphs without intersecting triangles

An acyclic edge coloring of a graph $G$ is a proper edge coloring such that no bichromatic cycles are produced. The acyclic edge coloring conjecture by Fiam{č}ik (1978) and Alon, Sudakov and Zaks (2001) states that every simple graph with maximum degree $Δ$ is acyclically edge $(Δ+ 2)$-colorable. Despite many milestones, the conjecture remains open even for planar graphs. In this paper, we confirm affirmatively the conjecture on planar graphs without intersecting triangles. We do so by first showing, by discharging methods, that every planar graph without intersecting triangles must have at least one of the six specified groups of local structures, and then proving the conjecture by recoloring certain edges in each such local structure and by induction on the number of edges in the graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On Computing a Center Persistence Diagram

Throughout this paper, a persistence diagram ${\cal P}$ is composed of a set $P$ of planar points (each corresponding to a topological feature) above the line $Y=X$, as well as the line $Y=X$ itself, i.e., ${\cal P}=P\cup\{(x,y)|y=x\}$. Given a set of persistence diagrams ${\cal P}_1,...,{\cal P}_m$, for the data reduction purpose, one way to summarize their topological features is to compute the {\em center} ${\cal C}$ of them first under the bottleneck distance. We consider two discrete versions and one continuous version. For technical reasons, we first focus on the case when $|P_i|$'s are all the same (i.e., all have the same size $n$), and the problem is to compute a center point set $C$ under the bottleneck matching distance. We show, by a non-trivial reduction from the Planar 3D-Matching problem, that this problem is NP-hard even when $m=3$ diagrams are given. This implies that the general center problem for persistence diagrams under the bottleneck distance, when $P_i$'s possibly have different sizes, is also NP-hard when $m\geq 3$. On the positive side, we show that this problem is polynomially solvable when $m=2$ and admits a factor-2 approximation for $m\geq 3$. These positive results hold for any $L_p$ metric when $P_i$'s are point sets of the same size, and also hold for the case when $P_i$'s have different sizes in the $L_\infty$ metric (i.e., for the Center Persistence Diagram problem). This is the best possible in polynomial time for the Center Persistence Diagram under the bottleneck distance unless P = NP. All these results hold for both of the discrete versions as well as the continuous version; in fact, the NP-hardness and approximation results also hold under the Wasserstein distance for the continuous version.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access