BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Guillaume Chauvet

Guillaume Chauvet appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodologyApplications

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Closed-form variance estimators for weighted and stratified dose-response function estimators using generalized propensity score

Propensity score methods are widely used in observational studies for evaluating marginal treatment effects. The generalized propensity score (GPS) is an extension of the propensity score framework, historically developed in the case of binary exposures, for use with quantitative or continuous exposures. In this paper, we proposed variance esti-mators for treatment effect estimators on continuous outcomes. Dose-response functions (DRF) were estimated through weighting on the inverse of the GPS, or using stratification. Variance estimators were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. Despite the use of stabilized weights, the variability of the weighted estimator of the DRF was particularly high, and none of the variance estimators (a bootstrap-based estimator, a closed-form estimator especially developped to take into account the estimation step of the GPS, and a sandwich estimator) were able to adequately capture this variability, resulting in coverages below to the nominal value, particularly when the proportion of the variation in the quantitative exposure explained by the covariates was 1 large. The stratified estimator was more stable, and variance estima-tors (a bootstrap-based estimator, a pooled linearized estimator, and a pooled model-based estimator) more efficient at capturing the empirical variability of the parameters of the DRF. The pooled variance estimators tended to overestimate the variance, whereas the bootstrap estimator, which intrinsically takes into account the estimation step of the GPS, resulted in correct variance estimations and coverage rates. These methods were applied to a real data set with the aim of assessing the effect of maternal body mass index on newborn birth weight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Coupling methods for multistage sampling

Multistage sampling is commonly used for household surveys when there exists no sampling frame, or when the population is scattered over a wide area. Multistage sampling usually introduces a complex dependence in the selection of the final units, which makes asymptotic results quite difficult to prove. In this work, we consider multistage sampling with simple random without replacement sampling at the first stage, and with an arbitrary sampling design for further stages. We consider coupling methods to link this sampling design to sampling designs where the primary sampling units are selected independently. We first generalize a method introduced by [Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. 5 (1960) 361-374] to get a coupling with multistage sampling and Bernoulli sampling at the first stage, which leads to a central limit theorem for the Horvitz--Thompson estimator. We then introduce a new coupling method with multistage sampling and simple random with replacement sampling at the first stage. When the first-stage sampling fraction tends to zero, this method is used to prove consistency of a with-replacement bootstrap for simple random without replacement sampling at the first stage, and consistency of bootstrap variance estimators for smooth functions of totals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Estimation under cross-classified sampling with application to a childhood survey

The cross-classified sampling design consists in drawing samples from a two-dimension population, independently in each dimension. Such design is commonly used in consumer price index surveys and has been recently applied to draw a sample of babies in the French ELFE survey, by crossing a sample of maternity units and a sample of days. We propose to derive a general theory of estimation for this sampling design. We consider the Horvitz-Thompson estimator for a total, and show that the cross-classified design will usually result in a loss of efficiency as compared to the widespread two-stage design. We obtain the asymptotic distribution of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator, and several unbiased variance estimators. Facing the problem of possibly negative values, we propose simplified non-negative variance estimators and study their bias under a super-population model. The proposed estimators are compared for totals and ratios on simulated data. An application on real data from the ELFE survey is also presented, and we make some recommendations. Supplementary materials are available online.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Joint imputation procedures for categorical variables

Marginal imputation, which consists of imputing each item requiring imputation separately, is often used in surveys. This type of imputation procedures leads to asymptotically unbiased estimators of simple parameters such as population totals (or means), but tends to distort relationships between variables. As a result, it generally leads to biased estimators of bivariate parameters such as coefficients of correlation or odd-ratios. Household and social surveys typically collect categorical variables, for which missing values are usually handled by nearest-neighbour imputation or random hot-deck imputation. In this paper, we propose a simple random imputation procedure, closely related to random hot-deck imputation, which succeeds in preserving the relationship between categorical variables. Also, a fully efficient version of the latter procedure is proposed. A limited simulation study compares several estimation procedures in terms of relative bias and relative efficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Martingale central-limit theorems for pivotal sampling

Ordered pivotal sampling is one of the simplest algorithm to perform without-replacement unequal probability sampling. It has found uses in the context of longitudinal surveys and spatial sampling, and enables in particular a good spatial balance of the selected units. In this work, we follow the approach proposed by Ohlsson~(1986), and apply a martingale central-limit theorem to prove the asymptotic normality of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator under a design-based approach, and under a model-assisted approach. In particular, our model assumptions allow for correlations between values, which is of particular interest for applications in spatial sampling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A note on the consistency of the Narain-Horvitz-Thompson estimator

For the Narain-Horvitz-Thompson estimator to have usual asymptotic properties such as consistency, some conditions on the sampling design and on the variable of interest are needed. Cardot et al. (2010) give some sufficient conditions for the mean square consistency, but one of them is usually difficult to prove or does not hold for some unequal probability sampling designs. We propose alternative conditions for the mean square consistency of the Narain-Horvitz-Thompson estimator. A specific result is also proved in case when a martingale sampling algorithm is used, which implies consistency under a fast algorithm for the cube method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On a characterization of ordered pivotal sampling

When auxiliary information is available at the design stage, samples may be selected by means of balanced sampling. Deville and Tille proposed in 2004 a general algorithm to perform balanced sampling, named the cube method. In this paper, we are interested in a particular case of the cube method named pivotal sampling, and first described by Deville and Tille in 1998. We show that this sampling algorithm, when applied to units ranked in a fixed order, is equivalent to Deville's systematic sampling, in the sense that both algorithms lead to the same sampling design. This characterization enables the computation of the second-order inclusion probabilities for pivotal sampling. We show that the pivotal sampling enables to take account of an appropriate ordering of the units to achieve a variance reduction, while limiting the loss of efficiency if the ordering is not appropriate.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access