Researcher profile

Grigory Yaremenko

Grigory Yaremenko contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Some remarks on stochastic converse Lyapunov theorems

In this brief note, we investigate some constructions of Lyapunov functions for stochastic discrete-time stabilizable dynamical systems, in other words, controlled Markov chains. The main question here is whether a Lyapunov function in some statistical sense exists if the respective controlled Markov chain admits a stabilizing policy. We demonstrate some constructions extending on the classical results for deterministic systems. Some limitations of the constructed Lyapunov functions for stabilization are discussed, particularly for stabilization in mean. Although results for deterministic systems are well known, the stochastic case was addressed in less detail, which the current paper remarks on. A distinguishable feature of this work is the study of stabilizers that possess computationally tractable convergence certificates.

preprint2022arXiv

A note on stabilizing reinforcement learning

Reinforcement learning is a general methodology of adaptive optimal control that has attracted much attention in various fields ranging from video game industry to robot manipulators. Despite its remarkable performance demonstrations, plain reinforcement learning controllers do not guarantee stability which compromises their applicability in industry. To provide such guarantees, measures have to be taken. This gives rise to what could generally be called stabilizing reinforcement learning. Concrete approaches range from employment of human overseers to filter out unsafe actions to formally verified shields and fusion with classical stabilizing controllers. A line of attack that utilizes elements of adaptive control has become fairly popular in the recent years. In this note, we critically address such an approach in a fairly general actor-critic setup for nonlinear time-continuous environments. The actor network utilizes a so-called robustifying term that is supposed to compensate for the neural network errors. The corresponding stability analysis is based on the value function itself. We indicate a problem in such a stability analysis and provide a counterexample to the overall control scheme. Implications for such a line of attack in stabilizing reinforcement learning are discussed. Furthermore, unfortunately the said problem possess no fix without a substantial reconsideration of the whole approach. As a positive message, we derive a stochastic critic neural network weight convergence analysis provided that the environment was stabilized.