Source author record

Gregory Bard

Gregory Bard appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Error Bounds on Derivatives during Simulations

The methods commonly used for numerical differentiation, such as the "center-difference formula" and "four-points formula" are unusable in simulations or real-time data analysis because they require knowledge of the future. In Bard'11, an algorithm was shown that generates formulas that require knowledge only of the past and present values of $f(t)$ to estimate $f'(t)$. Furthermore, the algorithm can handle irregularly spaced data and higher-order derivatives. That work did not include a rigorous proof of correctness nor the error bounds. In this paper, the correctness and error bounds of that algorithm are proven, explicit forms are given for the coefficients, and several interesting corollaries are proven.

preprint2008arXiv

Efficient Multiplication of Dense Matrices over GF(2)

We describe an efficient implementation of a hierarchy of algorithms for multiplication of dense matrices over the field with two elements (GF(2)). In particular we present our implementation -- in the M4RI library -- of Strassen-Winograd matrix multiplication and the "Method of the Four Russians" multiplication (M4RM) and compare it against other available implementations. Good performance is demonstrated on on AMD's Opteron and particulary good performance on Intel's Core 2 Duo. The open-source M4RI library is available stand-alone as well as part of the Sage mathematics software. In machine terms, addition in GF(2) is logical-XOR, and multiplication is logical-AND, thus a machine word of 64-bits allows one to operate on 64 elements of GF(2) in parallel: at most one CPU cycle for 64 parallel additions or multiplications. As such, element-wise operations over GF(2) are relatively cheap. In fact, in this paper, we conclude that the actual bottlenecks are memory reads and writes and issues of data locality. We present our empirical findings in relation to minimizing these and give an analysis thereof.