BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Glenn Byrenheid

Glenn Byrenheid contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NAmath.FANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Rate-optimal sparse approximation of compact break-of-scale embeddings

The paper is concerned with the sparse approximation of functions having hybrid regularity borrowed from the theory of solutions to electronic Schrödinger equations due to Yserentant [43]. We use hyperbolic wavelets to introduce corresponding new spaces of Besov- and Triebel-Lizorkin-type to particularly cover the energy norm approximation of functions with dominating mixed smoothness. Explicit (non-)adaptive algorithms are derived that yield sharp dimension-independent rates of convergence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Sampling on energy-norm based sparse grids for the optimal recovery of Sobolev type functions in $H^γ$

We investigate the rate of convergence of linear sampling numbers of the embedding $H^{α,β} (\mathbb{T}^d) \hookrightarrow H^γ(\mathbb{T}^d)$. Here $α$ governs the mixed smoothness and $β$ the isotropic smoothness in the space $H^{α,β}(\mathbb{T}^d)$ of hybrid smoothness, whereas $H^γ(\mathbb{T}^d)$ denotes the isotropic Sobolev space. If $γ>β$ we obtain sharp polynomial decay rates for the first embedding realized by sampling operators based on &#34;energy-norm based sparse grids&#34; for the classical trigonometric interpolation. This complements earlier work by Griebel, Knapek and Dũng, Ullrich, where general linear approximations have been considered. In addition, we study the embedding $H^α_{mix} (\mathbb{T}^d) \hookrightarrow H^γ_{mix}(\mathbb{T}^d)$ and achieve optimality for Smolyak&#39;s algorithm applied to the classical trigonometric interpolation. This can be applied to investigate the sampling numbers for the embedding $H^α_{mix} (\mathbb{T}^d) \hookrightarrow L_q(\mathbb{T}^d)$ for $2<q\leq \infty$ where again Smolyak&#39;s algorithm yields the optimal order. The precise decay rates for the sampling numbers in the mentioned situations always coincide with those for the approximation numbers, except probably in the limiting situation $β= γ$ (including the embedding into $L_2(\mathbb{T}^d)$). The best what we could prove there is a (probably) non-sharp results with a logarithmic gap between lower and upper bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access