BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Geoffrey B. West

Geoffrey B. West contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phPopulations and Evolutionq-fin.GN

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Scaling laws and a general theory for the growth of public companies

Publicly traded companies are fundamental units of contemporary economies and markets and are important mechanisms through which humans interact with their environments. Understanding the general properties that underlie the processes of their growth has long been of interest, yet fundamental debates about the effects of firm size on growth have persisted. Here we develop a scaling framework that focuses on company size as the critical feature determining a variety of tradeoffs, and use this to reveal novel systematic behavior across the diversity of publicly-traded companies. Using a large database of 31,553 US companies over nearly 70 years, and 3,160 Chinese companies over 24 year, we show how the dynamics of companies expressed as scaling relationships leads to a quantitative, analytic theory for their growth. This theory produces several predictions that are in good agreement with data for both the US and China, whose markets have strikingly different histories and underlying structures. In both cases sales scale sublinearly with assets and exhibit nearly identical exponents leading, surprisingly and nontrivially, to assets that grow as a power law in time rather than exponentially, as often assumed. On the other hand, liabilities scale linearly in the US (exponent of $1.0$) but superlinearly in China (exponent of $1.09$). We show that such small differences in scaling exponents can have a significant impact on the character and long-term evolution of growth trajectories. These results illustrate that while companies are part of a larger class of growth phenomena driven by incomes and costs that scale with size, they are unique in that they grow following a temporal power-function which sets them apart from organisms, cities, nations, and markets, whose growth over time is often exponential.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Scaling of Urban Income Inequality in the United States

Urban scaling analysis, the study of how aggregated urban features vary with the population of an urban area, provides a promising framework for discovering commonalities across cities and uncovering dynamics shared by cities across time and space. Here, we use the urban scaling framework to study an important, but under-explored feature in this community - income inequality. We propose a new method to study the scaling of income distributions by analyzing total income scaling in population percentiles. We show that income in the least wealthy decile (10%) scales close to linearly with city population, while income in the most wealthy decile scale with a significantly superlinear exponent. In contrast to the superlinear scaling of total income with city population, this decile scaling illustrates that the benefits of larger cities are increasingly unequally distributed. For the poorest income deciles, cities have no positive effect over the null expectation of a linear increase. We repeat our analysis after adjusting income by housing cost, and find similar results. We then further analyze the shapes of income distributions. First, we find that mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis of income distributions all increase with city size. Second, the Kullback-Leibler divergence between a city's income distribution and that of the largest city decreases with city population, suggesting the overall shape of income distribution shifts with city population. As most urban scaling theories consider densifying interactions within cities as the fundamental process leading to the superlinear increase of many features, our results suggest this effect is only seen in the upper deciles of the cities. Our finding encourages future work to consider heterogeneous models of interactions to form a more coherent understanding of urban scaling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Dynamics of growth, death, and resource competition in sessile organisms

Population-level scaling in ecological systems arises from individual growth and death with competitive constraints. We build on a minimal dynamical model of metabolic growth where the tension between individual growth and mortality determines population size distribution. We include resource competition based on shared capture area separately. By varying relative rates of growth, death, and competitive attrition, we connect regular and random spatial patterns across sessile organisms from forests to ants, termites, and fairy circles. Then, we consider transient temporal dynamics in the context of asymmetric competition that primarily weakens the smaller of two competitors such as canopy shading or large colony dominance. When such competition couples slow timescales of growth with fast competitive death, it generates population shock waves similar to those observed in forest demographic data. Our minimal quantitative theory unifies spatiotemporal patterns across sessile organisms through local competition mediated by the laws of metabolic growth which in turn result from long-term evolutionary dynamics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The hidden universality of movement in cities

The interaction of all mobile species with their environment hinges on their movement patterns: the places they visit and how frequently they go there. In human society, where the prevalent form of cohabitation is in cities, the highly dynamic and diverse movement of people is fundamental to almost every aspect of socio-economic life, including social interactions or disease spreading, and ultimately is key to the evolution of urban infrastructure, productivity, innovation and technology. However, despite the crucial role of the spatio-temporal structure of movement in cities, the laws that govern the variation of population flows to specific locations have remained elusive. Here we show that behind the apparent complexity of movement a surprisingly simple universal scaling relation drives the flow of individuals to any specific location based on both frequency of visitation and distance travelled. We derive a first principles argument stating that the number of visiting individuals should decrease as an inverse square of the product of visitation frequency and travel distance; or, equivalently, as a power law with exponent $\approx \! -$2. Using large-scale data analyses, we demonstrate that population flows obey this theoretical prediction in virtually all tested areas across the globe, ranging from Europe and America to Asia and Africa, regardless of the detailed geographies, cultures or levels of development. The revealed regularity offers unprecedented possibilities for the modelling of mobility fluxes at high spatial and temporal resolution, and it places an important constraint on any theory of movement, spatial organisation and social interaction in cities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access