Researcher profile

Furkan Gursoy

Furkan Gursoy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

cs.CY Applications Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning physics.soc-ph Social and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author

3works

0followers

6topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Error Parity Fairness: Testing for Group Fairness in Regression Tasks

The applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) surround decisions on increasingly many aspects of human lives. Society responds by imposing legal and social expectations for the accountability of such automated decision systems (ADSs). Fairness, a fundamental constituent of AI accountability, is concerned with just treatment of individuals and sensitive groups (e.g., based on sex, race). While many studies focus on fair learning and fairness testing for the classification tasks, the literature is rather limited on how to examine fairness in regression tasks. This work presents error parity as a regression fairness notion and introduces a testing methodology to assess group fairness based on a statistical hypothesis testing procedure. The error parity test checks whether prediction errors are distributed similarly across sensitive groups to determine if an ADS is fair. It is followed by a suitable permutation test to compare groups on several statistics to explore disparities and identify impacted groups. The usefulness and applicability of the proposed methodology are demonstrated via a case study on COVID-19 projections in the US at the county level, which revealed race-based differences in forecast errors. Overall, the proposed regression fairness testing methodology fills a gap in the fair machine learning literature and may serve as a part of larger accountability assessments and algorithm audits.

preprint2022arXiv

System Cards for AI-Based Decision-Making for Public Policy

Decisions impacting human lives are increasingly being made or assisted by automated decision-making algorithms. Many of these algorithms process personal data for predicting recidivism, credit risk analysis, identifying individuals using face recognition, and more. While potentially improving efficiency and effectiveness, such algorithms are not inherently free from bias, opaqueness, lack of explainability, maleficence, and the like. Given that the outcomes of these algorithms have a significant impact on individuals and society and are open to analysis and contestation after deployment, such issues must be accounted for before deployment. Formal audits are a way of ensuring algorithms meet the appropriate accountability standards. This work, based on an extensive analysis of the literature and an expert focus group study, proposes a unifying framework for a system accountability benchmark for formal audits of artificial intelligence-based decision-aiding systems. This work also proposes system cards to serve as scorecards presenting the outcomes of such audits. It consists of 56 criteria organized within a four-by-four matrix composed of rows focused on (i) data, (ii) model, (iii) code, (iv) system, and columns focused on (a) development, (b) assessment, (c) mitigation, and (d) assurance. The proposed system accountability benchmark reflects the state-of-the-art developments for accountable systems, serves as a checklist for algorithm audits, and paves the way for sequential work in future research.

preprint2021arXiv

Extracting the signed backbone of intrinsically dense weighted networks

Networks provide useful tools for analyzing diverse complex systems from natural, social, and technological domains. Growing size and variety of data such as more nodes and links and associated weights, directions, and signs can provide accessory information. Link and weight abundance, on the other hand, results in denser networks with noisy, insignificant, or otherwise redundant data. Moreover, typical network analysis and visualization techniques presuppose sparsity and are not appropriate or scalable for dense and weighted networks. As a remedy, network backbone extraction methods aim to retain only the important links while preserving the useful and elucidative structure of the original networks for further analyses. Here, we provide the first methods for extracting signed network backbones from intrinsically dense unsigned unipartite weighted networks. Utilizing a null model based on statistical techniques, the proposed significance filter and vigor filter allow inferring edge signs. Empirical analysis on migration, voting, temporal interaction, and species similarity networks reveals that the proposed filters extract meaningful and sparse signed backbones while preserving the multiscale nature of the network. The resulting backbones exhibit characteristics typically associated with signed networks such as reciprocity, structural balance, and community structure. The developed tool is provided as a free, open-source software package.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint