Researcher profile

Friederike Laus

Friederike Laus contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Alternatives to the EM Algorithm for ML-Estimation of Location, Scatter Matrix and Degree of Freedom of the Student-$t$ Distribution

In this paper, we consider maximum likelihood estimations of the degree of freedom parameter $ν$, the location parameter $μ$ and the scatter matrix $Σ$ of the multivariate Student-$t$ distribution. In particular, we are interested in estimating the degree of freedom parameter $ν$ that determines the tails of the corresponding probability density function and was rarely considered in detail in the literature so far. We prove that under certain assumptions a minimizer of the negative log-likelihood function exists, where we have to take special care of the case $ν\rightarrow \infty$, for which the Student-$t$ distribution approaches the Gaussian distribution. As alternatives to the classical EM algorithm we propose three other algorithms which cannot be interpreted as EM algorithm. For fixed $ν$, the first algorithm is an accelerated EM algorithm known from the literature. However, since we do not fix $ν$, we cannot apply standard convergence results for the EM algorithm. The other two algorithms differ from this algorithm in the iteration step for $ν$. We show how the objective function behaves for the different updates of $ν$ and prove for all three algorithms that it decreases in each iteration step. We compare the algorithms as well as some accelerated versions by numerical simulation and apply one of them for estimating the degree of freedom parameter in images corrupted by Student-$t$ noise.