Researcher profile

Frédéric De Geuser

Frédéric De Geuser contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Spatial resolution(s) in atom probe tomography

Atom probe tomography (APT) is often quoted to provide "atomic-scale" analysis of materials in three dimensions. Despite efforts to quantify APT's spatial resolution, misunderstanding remain regarding its true spatial performance. If the depth resolution was once reported to be 20 pm, quoting this value outside of its specific context is misleading and should be avoided. The resolution achievable in pure metals, at one specific location within one reconstructed dataset, does not generally apply across materials or analysis conditions, or even throughout a single tomographic reconstruction. Here, we review various efforts at defining and measuring the spatial resolution in the study of single phase and single element materials - i.e. pure metals - in field-ion microscopy (FIM) and APT. We also report on the degradation of the resolution arising from ion optical devices used to improve the mass-resolution. We aim to offer some perspective as to how reported resolutions may be or may not be of any relevance to most of the materials characterisation efforts by APT, including cases of precipitates in a matrix that emphasise the need to consider an effective resolution. Finally, we discuss concepts to improve the spatial accuracy of the technique in a relatively distant future.

preprint2020arXiv

Intermixing of Fe and Cu on the atomic scale by high-pressure torsion as revealed by DC- and AC-SQUID susceptometry and atom probe tomography

The capability of high-pressure torsion on the preparation of supersaturated solid solutions, consisting of Cu-14Fe (wt.%), is studied. From microstructural investigations a steady state is obtained with nanocrystalline grains. The as-deformed state is analyzed with atom probe tomography, revealing an enhanced solubility and the presence of Fe-rich particles. The DC-hysteresis loop shows suppressed long range interactions in the as-deformed state and evolves towards a typical bulk hysteresis loop when annealed at 500°C. AC-susceptometry measurements of the as-deformed state reveal the presence of a superparamagnetic blocking peak, as well as a magnetic frustrated phase, whereas the transition of the latter follows the Almeida-Thouless line, coinciding with the microstructural investigations by atom probe tomography. AC-susceptometry shows that the frustrated state vanishes for annealing at 250°C.

preprint2020arXiv

Metrology of small particles and solute clusters by atom probe tomography

Atom probe tomography (APT) is routinely used for analyzing property-enhancing particles in the nanometer-size range and below, and plays a prominent role in the analysis of solute clusters. However, the question of how well these small particles are measured has never been addressed because of a lack of a reliable benchmark. Here, to address this critical gap, we use an approach that allows direct comparison of APT and small-angle (X-Ray) scattering (SA(X)S) performed on the same material. We introduce the notion of an effective spatial resolution for the analysis of particles, which, importantly in this context, is very different than the technique's inherent spatial resolution. This effective resolution is highly specific to the system being considered, as well as the analysis conditions. There is no hard limit below which the technique will fail, but particles with a radius of order of \textapprox $2σ=1nm$, i.e. \textapprox\num{250} atoms cannot be accurately measured, even though the particles are detected. This thorough metrological assessment of APT in the analysis of particles allows us to discuss the pulse spread function of the technique and the physics underpinning its limits. We conclude that great care should be taken when analysing solute clusters by APT, in particular when reporting particle size and composition.