BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Frank P. A. Coolen

Frank P. A. Coolen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Methodologymath.STStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A monotonicity property of weighted log-rank tests

The logrank test is a well-known nonparametric test which is often used to compare the survival distributions of two samples including right censored observations, it is also known as the Mantel-Haenszel test. The $G^ρ$ family of tests, introduced by Harrington and Fleming (1982), generalizes the logrank test by using weights assigned to observations. In this paper, we present a monotonicity property for the $G^ρ$ family of tests, which was motivated by the need to derive bounds for the test statistic in case of imprecise data observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The joint survival signature of coherent systems with shared components

The concept of joint bivariate signature, introduced by Navarro et al. (2013), is a useful tool for quantifying the reliability of two systems with shared components. As with the univariate system signature, introduced by Samaniego (2007), its applications are limited to systems with only one type of components, which restricts its practical use. Coolen and Coolen-Maturi (2012) introduced the survival signature, which generalizes Samaniego's signature and can be used for systems with multiple types of components. This paper introduces a joint survival signature for multiple systems with multiple types of components and with some components shared between systems. A particularly important feature is that the functioning of these systems can be considered at different times, enabling computation of relevant conditional probabilities with regard to a system's functioning conditional on the status of another system with which it shares components. Several opportunities for practical application and related challenges for further development of the presented concept are briefly discussed, setting out an important direction for future research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Bayesian Nonparametric System Reliability using Sets of Priors

An imprecise Bayesian nonparametric approach to system reliability with multiple types of components is developed. This allows modelling partial or imperfect prior knowledge on component failure distributions in a flexible way through bounds on the functioning probability. Given component level test data these bounds are propagated to bounds on the posterior predictive distribution for the functioning probability of a new system containing components exchangeable with those used in testing. The method further enables identification of prior-data conflict at the system level based on component level test data. New results on first-order stochastic dominance for the Beta-Binomial distribution make the technique computationally tractable. Our methodological contributions can be immediately used in applications by reliability practitioners as we provide easy to use software tools.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Robust Bayesian Reliability for Complex Systems under Prior-Data Conflict

In reliability engineering, data about failure events is often scarce. To arrive at meaningful estimates for the reliability of a system, it is therefore often necessary to also include expert information in the analysis, which is straightforward in the Bayesian approach by using an informative prior distribution. A problem called prior-data conflict then can arise: observed data seem very surprising from the viewpoint of the prior, i.e., information from data is in conflict with prior assumptions. Models based on conjugate priors can be insensitive to prior-data conflict, in the sense that the spread of the posterior distribution does not increase in case of such a conflict, thus conveying a false sense of certainty. An approach to mitigate this issue is presented, by considering sets of prior distributions to model limited knowledge on Weibull distributed component lifetimes, treating systems with arbitrary layout using the survival signature. This approach can be seen as a robust Bayesian procedure or imprecise probability method that reflects surprisingly early or late component failures by wider system reliability bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Sets of Priors Reflecting Prior-Data Conflict and Agreement

In Bayesian statistics, the choice of prior distribution is often debatable, especially if prior knowledge is limited or data are scarce. In imprecise probability, sets of priors are used to accurately model and reflect prior knowledge. This has the advantage that prior-data conflict sensitivity can be modelled: Ranges of posterior inferences should be larger when prior and data are in conflict. We propose a new method for generating prior sets which, in addition to prior-data conflict sensitivity, allows to reflect strong prior-data agreement by decreased posterior imprecision.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access