BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

François G. Dorais

François G. Dorais contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.LOmath.GN

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
10works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Comparing the strength of diagonally non-recursive functions in the absence of $Σ^0_2$ induction

We prove that the statement "there is a $k$ such that for every $f$ there is a $k$-bounded diagonally non-recursive function relative to $f$" does not imply weak König's lemma over $\mathrm{RCA}_0 + \mathrm{B}Σ^0_2$. This answers a question posed by Simpson. A recursion-theoretic consequence is that the classic fact that every $k$-bounded diagonally non-recursive function computes a $2$-bounded diagonally non-recursive function may fail in the absence of $\mathrm{I}Σ^0_2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On uniform relationships between combinatorial problems

The enterprise of comparing mathematical theorems according to their logical strength is an active area in mathematical logic. In this setting, called reverse mathematics, one investigates which theorems provably imply which others in a weak formal theory roughly corresponding to computable mathematics. Since the proofs of such implications take place in classical logic, they may in principle involve appeals to multiple applications of a particular theorem, or to non-uniform decisions about how to proceed in a given construction. In practice, however, if a theorem $\mathsf{Q}$ implies a theorem $\mathsf{P}$, it is usually because there is a direct uniform translation of the problems represented by $\mathsf{P}$ into the problems represented by $\mathsf{Q}$, in a precise sense. We study this notion of uniform reducibility in the context of several natural combinatorial problems, and compare and contrast it with the traditional notion of implication in reverse mathematics. We show, for instance, that for all $n,j,k \geq 1$, if $j < k$ then Ramsey&#39;s theorem for $n$-tuples and $k$ many colors does not uniformly reduce to Ramsey&#39;s theorem for $j$ many colors. The two theorems are classically equivalent, so our analysis gives a genuinely finer metric by which to gauge the relative strength of mathematical propositions. We also study Weak König&#39;s Lemma, the Thin Set Theorem, and the Rainbow Ramsey&#39;s Theorem, along with a number of their variants investigated in the literature. Uniform reducibility turns out to be connected with sequential forms of mathematical principles, where one wishes to solve infinitely many instances of a particular problem simultaneously. We exploit this connection to uncover new points of difference between combinatorial problems previously thought to be more closely related.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Reverse Mathematics and Algebraic Field Extensions

This paper analyzes theorems about algebraic field extensions using the techniques of reverse mathematics. In section 2, we show that $\mathsf{WKL}_0$ is equivalent to the ability to extend $F$-automorphisms of field extensions to automorphisms of $\bar{F}$, the algebraic closure of $F$. Section 3 explores finitary conditions for embeddability. Normal and Galois extensions are discussed in section 4, and the Galois correspondence theorems for infinite field extensions are treated in section 5.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A variant of Mathias forcing that preserves $\mathsf{ACA}_0$

We present and analyze $F_σ$-Mathias forcing, which is similar but tamer than Mathias forcing. In particular, we show that this forcing preserves certain weak subsystems of second-order arithmetic such as $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ and $\mathsf{WKL}_0 + \mathsf{I}Σ^0_2$, whereas Mathias forcing does not. We also show that the needed reals for $F_σ$-Mathias forcing (in the sense of Blass) are just the computable reals, as opposed to the hyperarithmetic reals for Mathias forcing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Classical consequences of continuous choice principles from intuitionistic analysis

The sequential form of a statement $\forallξ(B(ξ) \rightarrow \existsζA(ξ,ζ))$ is the statement $\forallξ(\forall n B(ξ_n) \rightarrow \existsζ\forall n A(ξ_n,ζ_n))$. There are many classically true statements of the first form whose proofs lack uniformity and therefore the corresponding sequential form is not provable in weak classical systems. The main culprit for this lack of uniformity is of course the law of excluded middle. Continuing along the lines of previous work by Hirst and Mummert, we show that if a statement of the first form satisfying certain syntactic requirements is provable in some weak intuitionistic system, then the proof is necessarily sufficiently uniform that the corresponding sequential form is provable in a corresponding weak classical system. Our results depend on Kleene&#39;s realizability with functions and the Lifschitz variant thereof.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A note on conjectures of F. Galvin and R. Rado

In 1968, Galvin conjectured that an uncountable poset $P$ is the union of countably many chains if and only if this is true for every subposet $Q \subseteq P$ with size $\aleph_1$. In 1981, Rado formulated a similar conjecture that an uncountable interval graph $G$ is countably chromatic if and only if this is true for every induced subgraph $H \subseteq G$ with size $\aleph_1$. Todorcevic has shown that Rado&#39;s Conjecture is consistent relative to the existence of a supercompact cardinal, while the consistency of Galvin&#39;s Conjecture remains open. In this paper, we survey and collect a variety of results related to these two conjectures. We also show that the extension of Rado&#39;s conjecture to the class of all chordal graphs is relatively consistent with the existence of a supercompact cardinal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Reverse mathematics of compact countable second-countable spaces

We study the reverse mathematics of the theory of countable second-countable topological spaces, with a focus on compactness. We show that the general theory of such spaces works as expected in the subsystem $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ of second-order arithmetic, but we find that many unexpected pathologies can occur in weaker subsystems. In particular, we show that $\mathsf{RCA}_0$ does not prove that every compact discrete countable second-countable space is finite and that $\mathsf{RCA}_0$ does not prove that the product of two compact countable second-countable spaces is compact. To circumvent these pathologies, we introduce strengthened forms of compactness, discreteness, and Hausdorffness which are better behaved in subsystems of second-order arithmetic weaker than $\mathsf{ACA}_0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Stationary and convergent strategies in Choquet games

If NONEMPTY has a winning strategy against EMPTY in the Choquet game on a space, the space is said to be a Choquet space. Such a winning strategy allows NONEMPTY to consider the entire finite history of previous moves before making each new move; a stationary strategy only permits NONEMPTY to consider the previous move by EMPTY. We show that NONEMPTY has a stationary winning strategy for every second countable T1 Choquet space. More generally, NONEMPTY has a stationary winning strategy for any T1 Choquet space with an open-finite basis. We also study convergent strategies for the Choquet game, proving the following results. (1) A T1 space X is the open image of a complete metric space if and only if NONEMPTY has a convergent winning strategy in the Choquet game on X. (2) A T1 space X is the compact open image of a metric space if and only if X is metacompact and NONEMPTY has a stationary convergent strategy in the Choquet game on X. (3) A T1 space X is the compact open image of a complete metric space if and only if X is metacompact and NONEMPTY has a stationary convergent winning strategy in the Choquet game on X.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access