BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
We prove that the statement "there is a k such that for every f there is a k-bounded diagonally non-recursive function relative to f" does not imply weak König's lemma over RCA0+BΣ20. This answers a question posed by Simpson. A recursion-theoretic consequence is that the classic fact that every k-bounded diagonally non-recursive function computes a 2-bounded diagonally non-recursive function may fail in the absence of IΣ20.
The enterprise of comparing mathematical theorems according to their logical strength is an active area in mathematical logic. In this setting, called reverse mathematics, one investigates which theorems provably imply which others in a weak formal theory roughly corresponding to computable mathematics. Since the proofs of such implications take place in classical logic, they may in principle involve appeals to multiple applications of a particular theorem, or to non-uniform decisions about how to proceed in a given construction. In practice, however, if a theorem Q implies a theorem P, it is usually because there is a direct uniform translation of the problems represented by P into the problems represented by Q, in a precise sense. We study this notion of uniform reducibility in the context of several natural combinatorial problems, and compare and contrast it with the traditional notion of implication in reverse mathematics. We show, for instance, that for all n,j,k≥1, if j<k then Ramsey's theorem for n-tuples and k many colors does not uniformly reduce to Ramsey's theorem for j many colors. The two theorems are classically equivalent, so our analysis gives a genuinely finer metric by which to gauge the relative strength of mathematical propositions. We also study Weak König's Lemma, the Thin Set Theorem, and the Rainbow Ramsey's Theorem, along with a number of their variants investigated in the literature. Uniform reducibility turns out to be connected with sequential forms of mathematical principles, where one wishes to solve infinitely many instances of a particular problem simultaneously. We exploit this connection to uncover new points of difference between combinatorial problems previously thought to be more closely related.
This paper analyzes theorems about algebraic field extensions using the techniques of reverse mathematics. In section 2, we show that WKL0 is equivalent to the ability to extend F-automorphisms of field extensions to automorphisms of Fˉ, the algebraic closure of F. Section 3 explores finitary conditions for embeddability. Normal and Galois extensions are discussed in section 4, and the Galois correspondence theorems for infinite field extensions are treated in section 5.
We present and analyze Fσ-Mathias forcing, which is similar but tamer than Mathias forcing. In particular, we show that this forcing preserves certain weak subsystems of second-order arithmetic such as ACA0 and WKL0+IΣ20, whereas Mathias forcing does not. We also show that the needed reals for Fσ-Mathias forcing (in the sense of Blass) are just the computable reals, as opposed to the hyperarithmetic reals for Mathias forcing.
We show that the automorphism groups of countably categorical linear orders are extremely amenable. Using methods of Kechris, Pestov, and Todorcevic, we use this fact to derive a structural Ramsey theorem for certain families of finite ordered structures with finitely many partial equivalence relations with convex classes.
The sequential form of a statement ∀ξ(B(ξ)→∃ζA(ξ,ζ)) is the statement ∀ξ(∀nB(ξn)→∃ζ∀nA(ξn,ζn)). There are many classically true statements of the first form whose proofs lack uniformity and therefore the corresponding sequential form is not provable in weak classical systems. The main culprit for this lack of uniformity is of course the law of excluded middle. Continuing along the lines of previous work by Hirst and Mummert, we show that if a statement of the first form satisfying certain syntactic requirements is provable in some weak intuitionistic system, then the proof is necessarily sufficiently uniform that the corresponding sequential form is provable in a corresponding weak classical system. Our results depend on Kleene's realizability with functions and the Lifschitz variant thereof.
In 1968, Galvin conjectured that an uncountable poset P is the union of countably many chains if and only if this is true for every subposet Q⊆P with size ℵ1. In 1981, Rado formulated a similar conjecture that an uncountable interval graph G is countably chromatic if and only if this is true for every induced subgraph H⊆G with size ℵ1. Todorcevic has shown that Rado's Conjecture is consistent relative to the existence of a supercompact cardinal, while the consistency of Galvin's Conjecture remains open. In this paper, we survey and collect a variety of results related to these two conjectures. We also show that the extension of Rado's conjecture to the class of all chordal graphs is relatively consistent with the existence of a supercompact cardinal.
We study the reverse mathematics of pigeonhole principles for finite powers of the ordinal ω. Four natural formulations are presented and their relative strengths are compared. In the analysis of the pigeonhole principle for ω2, we uncover two weak variants of Ramsey's Theorem for pairs.
We study the reverse mathematics of the theory of countable second-countable topological spaces, with a focus on compactness. We show that the general theory of such spaces works as expected in the subsystem ACA0 of second-order arithmetic, but we find that many unexpected pathologies can occur in weaker subsystems. In particular, we show that RCA0 does not prove that every compact discrete countable second-countable space is finite and that RCA0 does not prove that the product of two compact countable second-countable spaces is compact. To circumvent these pathologies, we introduce strengthened forms of compactness, discreteness, and Hausdorffness which are better behaved in subsystems of second-order arithmetic weaker than ACA0.
If NONEMPTY has a winning strategy against EMPTY in the Choquet game on a space, the space is said to be a Choquet space. Such a winning strategy allows NONEMPTY to consider the entire finite history of previous moves before making each new move; a stationary strategy only permits NONEMPTY to consider the previous move by EMPTY. We show that NONEMPTY has a stationary winning strategy for every second countable T1 Choquet space. More generally, NONEMPTY has a stationary winning strategy for any T1 Choquet space with an open-finite basis. We also study convergent strategies for the Choquet game, proving the following results. (1) A T1 space X is the open image of a complete metric space if and only if NONEMPTY has a convergent winning strategy in the Choquet game on X. (2) A T1 space X is the compact open image of a metric space if and only if X is metacompact and NONEMPTY has a stationary convergent strategy in the Choquet game on X. (3) A T1 space X is the compact open image of a complete metric space if and only if X is metacompact and NONEMPTY has a stationary convergent winning strategy in the Choquet game on X.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.