BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Francisco Fuica

Francisco Fuica contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A posteriori error estimates for an optimal control problem with a bilinear state equation

We propose and analyze a posteriori error estimators for an optimal control problem that involves an elliptic partial differential equation as state equation and a control variable that enters the state equation as a coefficient; pointwise constraints on the control variable are considered as well. We consider two different strategies to approximate optimal variables: a fully discrete scheme in which the admissible control set is discretized with piecewise constant functions and a semi-discrete scheme where the admissible control set is not discretized; the latter scheme being based on the so-called variational discretization approach. We design, for each solution technique, an a posteriori error estimator and show, in two and three dimensional Lipschitz polygonal/polyhedral domains (not necessarily convex), that the proposed error estimator is reliable and efficient. We design, based on the devised estimators, adaptive strategies that deliver optimal experimental rates of convergence for the performed numerical examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

An Optimal Control Problem for the Navier--Stokes Equations with Point Sources

We analyze, in two dimensions, an optimal control problem for the Navier--Stokes equations where the control variable corresponds to the amplitude of forces modeled as point sources; control constraints are also considered. This particular setting leads to solutions to the state equation exhibiting reduced regularity properties. We operate under the framework of Muckenhoupt weights, Muckenhoupt-weighted Sobolev spaces, and the corresponding weighted norm inequalities and derive the existence of optimal solutions and first and, necessary and sufficient, second order optimality conditions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A posteriori error estimates for a distributed optimal control problem of the stationary Navier-Stokes equations

In two and three dimensional Lipschitz, but not necessarily convex, polytopal domains, we propose and analyze a posteriori error estimators for an optimal control problem involving the stationary Navier--Stokes equations; control constraints are also considered. We devise two strategies of discretization: a semi discrete scheme where the control variable is not discretized -- the so-called variational discrezation approach -- and a fully discrete scheme where the control is discretized with piecewise quadratic functions. For each solution solution technique, we design an a posteriori error estimator that can be decomposed as the sum of contributions related to the discretization of the state and adjoint equations and, additionally, the discretization of the control variable for when the fully discrete scheme is considered. We prove that the devised error estimators are reliable and also explore local efficiency estimates. Numerical experiments reveal a competitive performance of adaptive loops based on the devised a posteriori error estimators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Error estimates for optimal control problems involving the Stokes system and Dirac measures

The aim of this work is to derive a priori error estimates for finite element discretizations of control--constrained optimal control problems that involve the Stokes system and Dirac measures. The first problem entails the minimization of a cost functional that involves point evaluations of the velocity field that solves the state equations. This leads to an adjoint problem with a linear combination of Dirac measures as a forcing term and whose solution exhibits reduced regularity properties. The second problem involves a control variable that corresponds to the amplitude of forces modeled as point sources. This leads to a solution of the state equations with reduced regularity properties. For each problem, we propose a finite element solution technique and derive a priori error estimates. Finally, we present numerical experiments, in two and three dimensions, that illustrate our theoretical developments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access