BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Francesco Ranzato

Francesco Ranzato appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Programming LanguagesLogic in Computer ScienceComputer Science and Game Theorycs.CYData Structures and AlgorithmsFormal Languages and Automata TheoryMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Local Completeness Logic on Kleene Algebra with Tests

Local Completeness Logic (LCL) has been put forward as a program logic for proving both the correctness and incorrectness of program specifications. LCL is an abstract logic, parameterized by an abstract domain that allows combining over- and under-approximations of program behaviors. It turns out that LCL instantiated to the trivial singleton abstraction boils down to O'Hearn incorrectness logic, which allows us to prove the presence of program bugs. It has been recently proved that suitable extensions of Kleene algebra with tests (KAT) allow representing both O'Hearn incorrectness and Hoare correctness program logics within the same equational framework. In this work, we generalize this result by showing how KATs extended either with a modal diamond operator or with a top element are able to represent the local completeness logic LCL. This is achieved by studying how these extended KATs can be endowed with an abstract domain so as to define the validity of correctness/incorrectness LCL triples and to show that the LCL proof system is logically sound and, under some hypotheses, complete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Complete Abstractions for Checking Language Inclusion

We study the language inclusion problem $L_1 \subseteq L_2$ where $L_1$ is regular or context-free. Our approach relies on abstract interpretation and checks whether an overapproximating abstraction of $L_1$, obtained by overapproximating the Kleene iterates of its least fixpoint characterization, is included in $L_2$. We show that a language inclusion problem is decidable whenever this overapproximating abstraction satisfies a completeness condition (i.e., its loss of precision causes no false alarm) and prevents infinite ascending chains (i.e., it guarantees termination of least fixpoint computations). This overapproximating abstraction of languages can be defined using quasiorder relations on words, where the abstraction gives the language of all the words "greater than or equal to" a given input word for that quasiorder. We put forward a range of such quasiorders that allow us to systematically design decision procedures for different language inclusion problems such as regular languages into regular languages or into trace sets of one-counter nets, and context-free languages into regular languages. In the case of inclusion between regular languages, some of the induced inclusion checking procedures correspond to well-known state-of-the-art algorithms like the so-called antichain algorithms. Finally, we provide an equivalent language inclusion checking algorithm based on a greatest fixpoint computation that relies on quotients of languages and, to the best of our knowledge, was not previously known.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Fair Training of Decision Tree Classifiers

We study the problem of formally verifying individual fairness of decision tree ensembles, as well as training tree models which maximize both accuracy and individual fairness. In our approach, fairness verification and fairness-aware training both rely on a notion of stability of a classification model, which is a variant of standard robustness under input perturbations used in adversarial machine learning. Our verification and training methods leverage abstract interpretation, a well established technique for static program analysis which is able to automatically infer assertions about stability properties of decision trees. By relying on a tool for adversarial training of decision trees, our fairness-aware learning method has been implemented and experimentally evaluated on the reference datasets used to assess fairness properties. The experimental results show that our approach is able to train tree models exhibiting a high degree of individual fairness w.r.t. the natural state-of-the-art CART trees and random forests. Moreover, as a by-product, these fair decision trees turn out to be significantly compact, thus enhancing the interpretability of their fairness properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Decidability and Synthesis of Abstract Inductive Invariants

Decidability and synthesis of inductive invariants ranging in a given domain play an important role in many software and hardware verification systems. We consider here inductive invariants belonging to an abstract domain $A$ as defined in abstract interpretation, namely, ensuring the existence of the best approximation in $A$ of any system property. In this setting, we study the decidability of the existence of abstract inductive invariants in $A$ of transition systems and their corresponding algorithmic synthesis. Our model relies on some general results which relate the existence of abstract inductive invariants with least fixed points of best correct approximations in $A$ of the transfer functions of transition systems and their completeness properties. This approach allows us to derive decidability and synthesis results for abstract inductive invariants which are applied to the well-known Kildall's constant propagation and Karr's affine equalities abstract domains. Moreover, we show that a recent general algorithm for synthesizing inductive invariants in domains of logical formulae can be systematically derived from our results and generalized to a range of algorithms for computing abstract inductive invariants.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Abstract Interpretation of Supermodular Games

Supermodular games find significant applications in a variety of models, especially in operations research and economic applications of noncooperative game theory, and feature pure strategy Nash equilibria characterized as fixed points of multivalued functions on complete lattices. Pure strategy Nash equilibria of supermodular games are here approximated by resorting to the theory of abstract interpretation, a well established and known framework used for designing static analyses of programming languages. This is obtained by extending the theory of abstract interpretation in order to handle approximations of multivalued functions and by providing some methods for abstracting supermodular games, in order to obtain approximate Nash equilibria which are shown to be correct within the abstract interpretation framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

An Abstract Interpretation-based Model of Tracing Just-In-Time Compilation

Tracing just-in-time compilation is a popular compilation technique for the efficient implementation of dynamic languages, which is commonly used for JavaScript, Python and PHP. We provide a formal model of tracing JIT compilation of programs using abstract interpretation. Hot path detection corresponds to an abstraction of the trace semantics of the program. The optimization phase corresponds to a transform of the original program that preserves its trace semantics up to an observation modeled by some abstraction. We provide a generic framework to express dynamic optimizations and prove them correct. We instantiate it to prove the correctness of dynamic type specialization and constant variable folding. We show that our framework is more general than the model of tracing compilation introduced by Guo and Palsberg [2011] based on operational bisimulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

An Efficient Simulation Algorithm on Kripke Structures

A number of algorithms for computing the simulation preorder (and equivalence) on Kripke structures are available. Let Sigma denote the state space, -> the transition relation and Psim the partition of Sigma induced by simulation equivalence. While some algorithms are designed to reach the best space bounds, whose dominating additive term is |Psim|^2, other algorithms are devised to attain the best time complexity O(|Psim||->|). We present a novel simulation algorithm which is both space and time efficient: it runs in O(|Psim|^2 log|Psim| + |Sigma|log|Sigma|) space and O(|Psim||->|log|Sigma|) time. Our simulation algorithm thus reaches the best space bounds while closely approaching the best time complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Correctness Kernels of Abstract Interpretations

In abstract interpretation-based static analysis, approximation is encoded by abstract domains. They provide systematic guidelines for designing abstract semantic functions that approximate some concrete system behaviors under analysis. It may happen that an abstract domain contains redundant information for the specific purpose of approximating a given concrete semantic function. This paper introduces the notion of correctness kernel of abstract interpretations, a methodology for simplifying abstract domains, i.e. removing abstract values from them, in a maximal way while retaining exactly the same approximate behavior of the system under analysis. We show that in abstract model checking correctness kernels provide a simplification paradigm of the abstract state space that is guided by examples, meaning that this simplification preserves spuriousness of examples (i.e., abstract paths). In particular, we show how correctness kernels can be integrated with the well-known CEGAR (CounterExample-Guided Abstraction Refinement) methodology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access